PDA

View Full Version : Mayo Joins The List...



clvclv
12-28-2016, 11:12 AM
Of those of us expecting Fried to breakout this season...

http://m.mlb.com/news/article/212224800/10-prospects-poised-for-success-in-2017/?topicid=151437456

thethe
12-28-2016, 11:27 AM
Justin Upton trade keeps on giving and giving.

It would be fun to rehash the reaction to both the Upton and Heyward deals. But that's just the inner troll in me.

sturg33
12-28-2016, 11:44 AM
Justin Upton trade keeps on giving and giving.

It would be fun to rehash the reaction to both the Upton and Heyward deals. But that's just the inner troll in me.

It hasn't produced anything yet other than a few Mallex at bats.

thethe
12-28-2016, 11:48 AM
It hasn't produced anything yet other than a few Mallex at bats.

There will be hypothetical surplus value generated. That has value in today's mlb.

thewupk
12-28-2016, 12:17 PM
Justin Upton trade keeps on giving and giving.

It would be fun to rehash the reaction to both the Upton and Heyward deals. But that's just the inner troll in me.

What reaction is that? Braves miscalculated on their contention time table at the start of the tear down and were bailed out by the Diamondbacks in an unbelievable way.

thethe
12-28-2016, 12:22 PM
What reaction is that? Braves miscalculated on their contention time table at the start of the tear down and were bailed out by the Diamondbacks in an unbelievable way.

So now we are going to put an asterisk on the braves rebuild so those complaining how awful the front office was don't end up being wrong?

thewupk
12-28-2016, 12:38 PM
So now we are going to put an asterisk on the braves rebuild so those complaining how awful the front office was don't end up being wrong?

If you want to, sure. Do you think their initial plan was correct or that they should have opted for a longer term plan instead? If you are going to rebuild then rebuild and not this half and half crap that they tried to keep some fan interest heading into the new stadium. I feel like Markakis and BJ deals were part of this. So was the HO deal.

clvclv
12-28-2016, 12:39 PM
Exactly how in the *ell did this thread turn into the same *issing match most of them do that quickly???

clvclv
12-28-2016, 12:40 PM
If you want to, sure. Do you think their initial plan was correct or that they should have opted for a longer term plan instead? If you are going to rebuild then rebuild and not this half and half crap that they tried to keep some fan interest heading into the new stadium. I feel like Markakis and BJ deals were part of this. So was the HO deal.

So they effed up and should all be fired.

Point made.

thethe
12-28-2016, 12:42 PM
If you want to, sure. Do you think their initial plan was correct or that they should have opted for a longer term plan instead? If you are going to rebuild then rebuild and not this half and half crap that they tried to keep some fan interest heading into the new stadium. I feel like Markakis and BJ deals were part of this. So was the HO deal.

Yes the Oliver deal sucked initially. They maDE a mistake. Every single gm in the history of sports has done the same.

nsacpi
12-28-2016, 01:05 PM
Exactly how in the *ell did this thread turn into the same *issing match most of them do that quickly???

if you care to look you might notice that the trolling begins in post 2

thethe
12-28-2016, 01:11 PM
if you care to look you might notice that the trolling begins in post 2

Guilty.

nsacpi
12-28-2016, 01:16 PM
Guilty.

well...pending the release of better analytical tools to reach such a verdict perhaps we should suspend judgment

thethe
12-28-2016, 01:19 PM
well...pending the release of better analytical tools to reach such a verdict perhaps we should suspend judgment

Witty as always....

weso1
12-28-2016, 01:25 PM
It hasn't produced anything yet other than a few Mallex at bats.

Jace has turned out to be a nice little player.

Enscheff
12-28-2016, 01:29 PM
The Braves certainly have no shortage of guys that could develop into TOR guys. Banking on pitching prospects is far riskier than banking on position prospects, and hopefully Some of those pitchers start progressing soon.

clvclv
12-28-2016, 01:40 PM
if you care to look you might notice that the trolling begins in post 2

Why does that make any difference? The point is that every thread turns into the same useless *hit - this one just happened to before anyone mentioned Fried other than in the original post.

Tapate50
12-28-2016, 01:46 PM
I like his profile. He could set us up well for the magical 2019 World Series run.

thewupk
12-28-2016, 01:50 PM
So they effed up and should all be fired.

Point made.

clearly

thewupk
12-28-2016, 01:53 PM
Yes the Oliver deal sucked initially. They maDE a mistake. Every single gm in the history of sports has done the same.

It did suck. And it wasn't just that the move was a mistake but going for an established player was a mistake, imo. Wood should of netted a nice prospect instead of wasting it on the supposed surplus value of HO.

TheBravos
12-28-2016, 02:00 PM
Actually the HO trade has "kinda" turned out somewhat decent if Kemp keeps producing. The real dog ends up being the Simmons trade if Newcomb bombs.

rico43
12-28-2016, 02:03 PM
It did suck. And it wasn't just that the move was a mistake but going for an established player was a mistake, imo. Wood should of netted a nice prospect instead of wasting it on the supposed surplus value of HO.

As was just mentioned previously, all GMs step on their d*** from time to time. This is a way to measuring the screw-ups. Schuerholz gave up half the farm for Teixeira, which got them nowhere, so they traded Teixeira for Casey effing Kotchman, which only compounded the disaster.
Coppy masterminds deal for Olivera, setting up a potential franchise disaster. But in less than a year, he's able to ship out Olivera and his entire contract for a 100 RBI guy who could have 2-3 such years left in him in Matt Kemp. It is possible to take chickens*** and make chicken salad.

Oh, yeah. I love Fried's upside. I especially like how they left him in Rome all year to enjoy both good health and success. He could easily skip a level, even though that would deny him the singular experience of being an original Fire Frog.
Fried the Fire Frog. It just rolls off the tongue.

Southcack77
12-28-2016, 02:05 PM
If you want to, sure. Do you think their initial plan was correct or that they should have opted for a longer term plan instead? If you are going to rebuild then rebuild and not this half and half crap that they tried to keep some fan interest heading into the new stadium. I feel like Markakis and BJ deals were part of this. So was the HO deal.

id he interested a little to have this argument fleshed out, but I think there may be assumptions about the timetable that are mistaken.

The rebuild easily could have always been a long term buildout that the braves both put a nice face on public ally and mde minor attempts at remaining respectable within a certain class of transactions that did not break the long term window.

thewupk
12-28-2016, 02:07 PM
As was just mentioned previously, all GMs step on their d*** from time to time. This is a way to measuring the screw-ups. Schuerholz gave up half the farm for Teixeira, which got them nowhere, so they traded Teixeira for Casey effing Kotchman, which only compounded the disaster.
Coppy masterminds deal for Olivera, setting up a potential franchise disaster. But in less than a year, he's able to ship out Olivera and his entire contract for a 100 RBI guy who could 2-3 such years left in him in Matt Kemp. It is possible to take chickens*** and make chicken salad.

It's a decent recovery that could be good. But the sad truth is even without the HO trade the Braves could have gotten Kemp for nothing and paid all of his salary like they currently are. It was a gamble on HO but I would of rather gambled on a prospect instead of trying to rush the rebuild. So my issue was more with the strategy than the actual trade itself. Like I said, the Marakkis deal and BJ/Kimbrel trade fall into this line of thinking as well.

thewupk
12-28-2016, 02:11 PM
id he interested a little to have this argument fleshed out, but I think there may be assumptions about the timetable that are mistaken.

The rebuild easily could have always been a long term buildout that the braves both put a nice face on public ally and mde minor attempts at remaining respectable within a certain class of transactions that did not break the long term window.

That's certainly possible. I do think a better course of action was to trade Kimbrel by himself and not include BJ's toxic contract with it to get a better return. And trading Wood for a prospect was likely a better course of action as well which many people on here wanted when news of that trade first popped up.

TheBravos
12-28-2016, 02:14 PM
As was just mentioned previously, all GMs step on their d*** from time to time. This is a way to measuring the screw-ups. Schuerholz gave up half the farm for Teixeira, which got them nowhere, so they traded Teixeira for Casey effing Kotchman, which only compounded the disaster.
Coppy masterminds deal for Olivera, setting up a potential franchise disaster. But in less than a year, he's able to ship out Olivera and his entire contract for a 100 RBI guy who could have 2-3 such years left in him in Matt Kemp. It is possible to take chickens*** and make chicken salad.

Oh, yeah. I love Fried's upside. I especially like how they left him in Rome all year to enjoy both good health and success. He could easily skip a level, even though that would deny him the singular experience of being an original Fire Frog.
Fried the Fire Frog. It just rolls off the tongue.

Exactly...the Teixeira trade was simply the worst trade in franchise history compounded by the Kotchman trade. Coppy made some serious lemonade by getting Kemp. On a side note....how in the world did they look at the HO trade and say "Yeah...that's good!!". I will never understand it...horrible...just horrible. At least Teixeira WAS a great player. HO was completely unproven, injury prone and older and we gave up a TON of assets. I'm a fan of the front office and think they have done a good job overall though.

thethe
12-28-2016, 02:16 PM
It did suck. And it wasn't just that the move was a mistake but going for an established player was a mistake, imo. Wood should of netted a nice prospect instead of wasting it on the supposed surplus value of HO.

The initial deal was a disaster. But we are still using outcomes to evaluate. If Olivera was as good as some scouts thought than his on tract and production would have been immensely valuable. Alas it did not work out. It happens. They saved the deal by getting Kemp at least.

thewupk
12-28-2016, 02:38 PM
The initial deal was a disaster. But we are still using outcomes to evaluate. If Olivera was as good as some scouts thought than his on tract and production would have been immensely valuable. Alas it did not work out. It happens. They saved the deal by getting Kemp at least.

Still lots of dead money in the deal even with Kemp. I wouldn't consider it saved. And you are right if it worked out like some scouts though, presumably all with the Braves, then it would of been great. I'm just not sure how high of a possibility that really was. And again, the main issue with this deal is the same as trading for some ace right now. It doesn't fit the Braves contention time frame.

Russ2dollas
12-28-2016, 03:29 PM
If you want to, sure. Do you think their initial plan was correct or that they should have opted for a longer term plan instead? If you are going to rebuild then rebuild and not this half and half crap that they tried to keep some fan interest heading into the new stadium. I feel like Markakis and BJ deals were part of this. So was the HO deal.

I think they were correct.

The BJ deal was not them.

The HO deal was bad. Adding BJ to Kimbrel was bad and I said it at the time. I get why they added BJ, but I didn't like it. The Markakis signing made no sense to me but I don't think it's really impacted anything.

I would have traded Tehran if we got a haul, but I don't know what the offers were. So far they seem to be correct on Tehran and FF.

I wish we would have had the number 2 pick in the draft instead of number 3, but I don't think Markakis was the difference there.

I'm not a Kemp guy, but I hope to be proven wrong.

Southcack77
12-28-2016, 04:51 PM
The initial deal was a disaster. But we are still using outcomes to evaluate. If Olivera was as good as some scouts thought than his on tract and production would have been immensely valuable. Alas it did not work out. It happens. They saved the deal by getting Kemp at least.

It's really not fair to say Oliviera in any way lead to Kemp.

The padres just ageeed to pay the braves money to take Kemp's contract. That came in the form of the padres taking and buying out Olivera.

Oliviera was never really something had any value to San Diego.

striker42
12-28-2016, 05:23 PM
It's really not fair to say Oliviera in any way lead to Kemp.

The padres just ageeed to pay the braves money to take Kemp's contract. That came in the form of the padres taking and buying out Olivera.

Oliviera was never really something had any value to San Diego.

This. We could just as easily have gotten Kemp by picking up the amount of money we're picking up and sending a nothing minor leaguer back.

The only potential saving grace of the Olivera deal is the draft pick.