Topless Pro-Abortion Women Sexually Harass Men Protecting Church

[sturg33]

I'm sure the anti-church folks on this board will laugh at this one, but I find this to be pretty disturbing and sad.

Link (http://www.lifesitenews.com/horror-mob-of-topless-pro-abort-feminists-attacks-rosary-praying-men-defend.html)

[50PoundHead]

I'm not amused, but I don't think anyone is pro-abortion. There are people who believe women should have access to an abortion. That's a significant difference.

[jpx7]

but I don't think anyone is pro-abortion

Well, eugenicists and radical Malthusians might be ...

[50PoundHead]

Well, eugenicists and radical Malthusians might be ...

Well, yeah!

[Dalyn]

I am pro-abortion. Don't consider myself a Malthusian, but my reasons are along those lines. There are much better ways to control population growth, none of which are currently in place or feasible with the system here in the United States.

[Dalyn]

But, anyway, those women would not get away with all of that if they were males.

[goldfly]

I love the first amendment


too bad it isn't protected as much as the useless 2nd one

[sturg33]

Curious Gold… You think assaulting people who are peacefully organizing is an exercise of your right of speech?

Drawing on people, spray painting them, sexually harassing/assaulting them? You love that?

Thought you were better than that

[Oklahomahawk]

No offense to anyone but I think most of those female protesters were, as Chef would put it, "playing for the wrong team, children"!!!

[goldfly]

i actually clicked the link

see this didn't happen here

when the ilk of the church commit war against people by making them sub human in the eyes of the law

i really don't care about them.

imagine if we just viewed each other as humans

[Runnin]

I can hardly believe that's Argentina. I spent 3 weeks there last year at this time.

[Dalyn]

No offense to anyone but I think most of those female protesters were, as Chef would put it, "playing for the wrong team, children"!!!

What gave it away? :cooter:

[goldfly]

adds from this link/source at the top of the page:

http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/simgad/1208275483881246072

http://www.lifesitenews.com/images/sized/images/main/End_Abortion_LSN-223x100.jpg

http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/simgad/11737336159425477916

hahaha

[Oklahomahawk]

What gave it away? :cooter:

Just a 6th sense I have about these things. :icon_biggrin:

[yeezus]

Yeah sturg, "anti-church" people inherently LOVE behavior like this. It's like you don't even want to remember what the church has done before. And that doesn't make this OK, but I think you're wrong on who supports behavior like this.
"Anti-church" is such a silly term. I, personally, don't care if you want to believe something. I could not care less. It's when people make their beliefs get in the way of other people's lives, or when it's taken to the extreme (like the church and other religions have done/do) that I have problems with it.
The people who have it best play victim the most.

[yeezus]

The comments on that video are hilarious, however.

[Carp]

i actually clicked the link

see this didn't happen here

when the ilk of the church commit war against people by making them sub human in the eyes of the law

i really don't care about them.

imagine if we just viewed each other as humans

The irony of this is way too much to bear.


So what exactly is abortion if not making fetuses sub human in the eyes of the law?

[goldfly]

The irony of this is way too much to bear.


So what exactly is abortion if not making fetuses sub human in the eyes of the law?

uh

your words prove that a fetus isn't a human

thus why it is a fetus

that isn't irony though

[Gary82]

I don't have an answer. The only reason I clicked this thread is because it mentioned topless women.

[zitothebrave]

Man those poor men and the poor catholic church in Argentina, what victims.

Would be interesting to hear the other side of the story. I'm not talkign the historical one where women in Argentina are historically opressed, or that Argentine laws are basically Catholic Sharia laws (though they have slacked off a little, now a woman doesn't have to fear having a rape baby or going to jail)

As with anything this is a relatively short video, with no indication what happened around it. Though I think rebelling against the Catholic Church is never a bad thing, would rather do it in a peaceful manner though.

[sturg33]

Yeah sturg, "anti-church" people inherently LOVE behavior like this. It's like you don't even want to remember what the church has done before. And that doesn't make this OK, but I think you're wrong on who supports behavior like this.
"Anti-church" is such a silly term. I, personally, don't care if you want to believe something. I could not care less. It's when people make their beliefs get in the way of other people's lives, or when it's taken to the extreme (like the church and other religions have done/do) that I have problems with it.
The people who have it best play victim the most.

Looks like the responses in this thread are proving me right.

[50PoundHead]

Looks like the responses in this thread are proving me right.

Careful, careful. Although I support a woman's right to seek an abortion, I am definitely not anti-church. If I were, I guess I simply wouldn't go every week and sing in the choir (not that the choir would miss me). I actually minored in theology, am an ardent believer, and take all of this seriously. I just recoil when I (and others who share the view) are being labelled "pro-abortion." While there have been laws governing abortion going back to the Code of Hammurabi, it wasn't until the 19th century (and the enacting of the Comstock Laws) that the issue really started to percolate.

[Dalyn]

Looks like the responses in this thread are proving me right.

I haven't seen a single 'anti-church' person support this. What thread are you reading?

[sturg33]

Looks like Goldy was all for it. Looks like you didn't condemn it.

[Dalyn]

Looks like Goldy was all for it. Looks like you didn't condemn it.

Sure I did. And Goldy (is he anti-church?) just questioned the validity of the source. Even if neither of us had condemned it, how is that showing LOVE for behavior like this?

[The Chosen One]

Sure I did. And Goldy (is he anti-church?) just questioned the validity of the source. Even if neither of us had condemned it, how is that showing LOVE for behavior like this?

Are you sure you didn't use any of these emoticons? :rock: :eusa_dance: :tchop: :eusa_clap:

Would definitely make someone think that.

[Dalyn]

Are you sure you didn't use any of these emoticons? :rock: :eusa_dance: :tchop: :eusa_clap:

Would definitely make someone think that.

Had to check. :Alone: Pretty sure I avoided those specific emoticons.

[sturg33]

Sure I did. And Goldy (is he anti-church?) just questioned the validity of the source. Even if neither of us had condemned it, how is that showing LOVE for behavior like this?

I never suggested anyone would love it. But Goldy said "I LOVE the first amendment."

Of course, I don't think assaulting someone is an exercise of the 1st amendment.

[Dalyn]

I never suggested anyone would love it. But Goldy said "I LOVE the first amendment."

Of course, I don't think assaulting someone is an exercise of the 1st amendment.

You implied such with your response to Yeezus.

So, to be absolutely clear, which responses proved you right--and about what?

[sturg33]

You implied such with your response to Yeezus.

So, to be absolutely clear, which responses proved you right--and about what?

I assumed folks would laugh this off… Here are some of the responses:

Goldy

I love the first amendment


when the ilk of the church commit war against people by making them sub human in the eyes of the law

i really don't care about them.


hahaha

Yeezus

The comments on that video are hilarious, however.

Gary

I don't have an answer. The only reason I clicked this thread is because it mentioned topless women.

Zito

Man those poor men and the poor catholic church in Argentina, what victims.

OHawk

No offense to anyone but I think most of those female protesters were, as Chef would put it, "playing for the wrong team, children"!!!

[Dalyn]

I assumed folks would laugh this off… Here are some of the responses:

Goldy






Yeezus


Gary


Zito


OHawk

You assumed ANTI-CHURCH people would laugh it off. None of those--to my knowledge--fall under that category.

[The Chosen One]

How do any of those responses mean someone here is Pro-Abortion?

[yeezus]

i don't laugh at all at why they were doing, I don't know anything about that situation.
I'm also not "anti-church."
So, sturg somehow wins, but idk how.

[yeezus]

How do any of those responses mean someone here is Pro-Abortion?

I, personally, love abortion. I get women pregnant for the sole purpose of having them have an abortion a few weeks later. Sometime, I wait a few MONTHS for extra fun.

[Dalyn]

How do any of those responses mean someone here is Pro-Abortion?

I AM pro-abortion, to be clear, but that has nothing to do with this video or my reaction to it.

[yeezus]

I AM pro-abortion, to be clear, but that has nothing to do with this video or my reaction to it.

I'm pro-choice, I don't love abortions. But I see why someone might want one. And I'm not going to tell them they can't.

[Dalyn]

I'm pro-choice, I don't love abortions. But I see why someone might want one. And I'm not going to tell them they can't.

I don't LOVE them. Who does? :snort: But yeah...

[The Chosen One]

I don't LOVE them. Who does? :snort: But yeah...

So you only love abortions after you've done a line of coke?

[yeezus]

I don't LOVE them. Who does? :snort: But yeah...

that's what I'm saying. I think "pro-abortion" sounds wrong; I don't necessarily condone it, but I DO condone someone's right to choose.

[Dalyn]

So you only love abortions after you've done a line of coke?

Sure. I love everything after a line of coke.

[Dalyn]

that's what I'm saying. I think "pro-abortion" sounds wrong; I don't necessarily condone it, but I DO condone someone's right to choose.

Eh. I am just worried about population growth. Don't mind me. I'll have some water and food stashed away when the ant farm falls off the dresser if you need some.

[goldfly]

Looks like Goldy was all for it. Looks like you didn't condemn it.

Since the church is in a war against it

i am fine if the other side fights back

sure

don't really see where "i am all for it" though


i just think both sides should live in peace by the godless homos ****ing each other in the ass in peace and the oh so righteous christians going to church and praying and living in peace

while both sides are equal to marry the person they love

it is as very simple

but to act like the people in the church don't have blood on their hands in this conflict is like saying we were attacked on 9.11 for our freedoms

in my eyes at least

[jpx7]

that's what I'm saying. I think "pro-abortion" sounds wrong; I don't necessarily condone it, but I DO condone someone's right to choose.

Moreover: one can both condone abortions and condone someone else's right to opt for abortion and still not be "pro-abortion," which seems to imply one is encouraging—even forcing—those that actively don't want abortions to have such procedures anyways.

[sturg33]

How do any of those responses mean someone here is Pro-Abortion?

Can someone please show me where i said anyone is "pro-abortion?"

[sturg33]

Since the church is in a war against it

i am fine if the other side fights back

sure

don't really see where "i am all for it" though


i just think both sides should live in peace by the godless homos ****ing each other in the ass in peace and the oh so righteous christians going to church and praying and living in peace

while both sides are equal to marry the person they love

it is as very simple

but to act like the people in the church don't have blood on their hands in this conflict is like saying we were attacked on 9.11 for our freedoms

in my eyes at least

I generally agree with this. But I don't see how anyone can support the actions of the folks in the video

[sturg33]

Just for the record, and so yeezus can get off my jock for a few minutes… I am in favor of allowing *** marriage, polygamous marriage, prostitution, drug use, etc… But I am not in favor of physically/sexually assaulting peaceful people to protest for it.

[Dalyn]

Moreover: one can both condone abortions and condone someone else's right to opt for abortion and still not be "pro-abortion," which seems to imply one is encouraging—even forcing—those that actively don't want abortions to have such procedures anyways.

I just think there should (at the very least) be a limit on how many ****ing kids you can have.

[Dalyn]

Just for the record, and so yeezus can get off my jock for a few minutes… I am in favor of allowing *** marriage, polygamous marriage, prostitution, drug use, etc… But I am not in favor of physically/sexually assaulting peaceful people to protest for it.

There is plenty to suggest that their side hasn't been peaceful at all, which is what Goldy has been talking about.

[sturg33]

There is plenty to suggest that their side hasn't been peaceful at all, which is what Goldy has been talking about.

They looked pretty peaceful in the video. Not fighting back. Simply joining together and praying. Those monsters!

I'm open to looking at Goldy's evidence that they deserved to be assaulted though.

And I figured people know me well enough that I am fully aware of the shortcomings/hypocrisies/corruptions of the church. I'm not absolving them from anything.

[Dalyn]

They looked pretty peaceful in the video. Not fighting back. Simply joining together and praying. Those monsters!

I'm open to looking at Goldy's evidence that they deserved to be assaulted though.

And I figured people know me well enough that I am fully aware of the shortcomings/hypocrisies/corruptions of the church. I'm not absolving them from anything.

They looked peaceful in a video they posted!? How surprising.

[Dalyn]

This kind of protest does not just happen.

[The Chosen One]

They looked pretty peaceful in the video. Not fighting back. Simply joining together and praying. Those monsters!

I'm open to looking at Goldy's evidence that they deserved to be assaulted though.

And I figured people know me well enough that I am fully aware of the shortcomings/hypocrisies/corruptions of the church. I'm not absolving them from anything.


:pound:

[sturg33]

This kind of protest does not just happen.

Again, I'm ready to look at the counter evidence. But your tone suggests you're defending the assaulters.

[The Chosen One]

This kind of protest does not just happen.
:cooter:

[Dalyn]

Again, I'm ready to look at the counter evidence. But your tone suggests you're defending the assaulters.

Context is not a defense, but rather an integral part of any real discussion.

[goldfly]

Can someone please show me where i said anyone is "pro-abortion?"

i would guess the term came from your thread title: "Topless Pro-Abortion Women...."

[The Chosen One]

i would guess the term came from your thread title: "Topless Pro-Abortion Women...."

And using sturg's laws of suggestive implication similar to gilesfans rule of Fan Laws, because you support their 1st amendment actions you're an ardent Pro-abortion guy

[sturg33]

i would guess the term came from your thread title: "Topless Pro-Abortion Women...."

Copied and pasted the title of the article

[sturg33]

And using sturg's laws of suggestive implication similar to gilesfans rule of Fan Laws, because you support their 1st amendment actions you're an ardent Pro-abortion guy

Assaulting people is not a 1st amendment right.

[goldfly]

Copied and pasted the title of the article

i guess this is your Ron Paul newsletter moment of saying you didn't know what you were signing

[sturg33]

i guess this is your Ron Paul newsletter moment of saying you didn't know what you were signing

No. Every article I post, I copy and paste the title of the article.

I'm still waiting for you to explain how the people in this video are exercising their first amendment right?

[zitothebrave]

No. Every article I post, I copy and paste the title of the article.

I'm still waiting for you to explain how the people in this video are exercising their first amendment right?

Then why is your title "Topless Pro-Abortion Women Sexually Harass Men Protecting Church" but the Title in the Article "Horror: Violent mob of topless pro-abort feminists attacks praying men defending cathedral (VIDEO)"

Unless you're copying a title from an unlinked source.

[sturg33]

Then why is your title "Topless Pro-Abortion Women Sexually Harass Men Protecting Church" but the Title in the Article "Horror: Violent mob of topless pro-abort feminists attacks praying men defending cathedral (VIDEO)"

Unless you're copying a title from an unlinked source.

Sorry - that's exactly what I did...

[zitothebrave]

When I Google your title it only shows up thedailypaul. Anyone else shocked?

[sturg33]

When I Google your title it only shows up thedailypaul. Anyone else shocked?

I go to the daily paul all the time. Does that make this video not real?

[zitothebrave]

It just proves a point about your general source material. I would only imagine your outrage of the pesky colonists vandalizing all that sovereign property of the British empire and tarring and feathering innocents.

[sturg33]

The majority of folks at daily paul (and libertarians in general( are very pro-choice

[goldfly]

No. Every article I post, I copy and paste the title of the article.

I'm still waiting for you to explain how the people in this video are exercising their first amendment right?
no you aren't

you are trying to change the subject


my words in post 7 say "i love the 1st amendment". which i do

this didn't happen here so our amendments have no jurisdiction. thus what my comment was about next in the thread once i actually clicked the link.

since i don't know the laws of their country, i don't know what their first amendment is to answer your change the subject question

[BedellBrave]

Their response fits their view. Ain't attractive.

[Dalyn]

Their response fits their view. Ain't attractive.

If that is true, there isn't an attractive view left in the world.

[BedellBrave]

I think there are many still.

[Dalyn]

I think there are many still.

I agree, but none (or a very few) that haven't had some ugly responses from supporters.