Both offenses are good with no real advantage on either side
Printable View
It's really tough to gauge, because the Braves have had a lot of unexpectedly bad performances and injuries that have been counterbalanced by a fair number of unsustainable performances by backups, reserves, and prospects.
I think the Braves have played most of the season without their platonic ideal of a best team, but they've benefitted from pretty good luck while that's been the case.
So what that means for the future, dunno. I think taking Donaldson off the team is a big blow though. That's production that will need to be replaced somehow (even if it is by Donaldson himself).
It's easy to forget how many poor performances we got this year from our pitching. That's not even including losing our closer Vizcaino after 4 games. We got 4 starts each from Newcomb, Wright and Wilson, the majority of which were poor. Touki was pretty bad. Winkler was very bad. Biddle was very bad. Minter was very bad. Carle was very bad. Venters was horrendous. Even Sobotka has a 5+ ERA. We somehow even survived Jackson's 7 blown saves. Kevin Gausman started 16 games for us and ended with an ERA over 6!!!
I think the key was that thanks to having good depth we were able to limit the damage from poor performers.
If you look at fWAR, our biggest "losers" were Venters and Carle with fWAR of -0.4. We cut our losses and moved on. Compare that to a team like the Metropolitans who had one pitcher at -0.4, one pitcher at -0.5, another at -0.6 and a third at -0.9. The Metropolitans have the aces but because they don't have as much depth they also have the bigger "losers."
It also helped that we did a good job of picking up a couple guys off the scrap heap. Even though they largely performed at replacement level, they helped limit the innings that were allocated to guys performing below replacement level.
It does raise an interesting question for the post-season. Tomlin, Blevins and Swarzak are replacement level pitchers. How much do we lean on those guys. Do they even make the post-season roster.
According to MLB.com's Jon Morosi, there is "increasing speculation in the industry" that Stephen Strasburg will opt out of his contract with the Nationals after this season.
Strasburg would be leaving four years and $100 million on the table, but he could probably come close to doubling that monetary figure on a market that will be light on upper-tier free agents. The 31-year-old right-hander is 16-5 with a 3.47 ERA, 1.039 WHIP, and 215/43 K/BB ratio through 179 innings (28 starts) this season. Morosi also suggests that Strasburg and his agent Scott Boras could leverage the opt-out possibility into a new long-term deal with Washington
Not saying opt outs are always good. But him opting out might be good for the sand fleas. Not Paying a 31 year old pitcher with numerous injuries another 100 million over 4 years could be a blessing in disguise. Let another team pony up more money for Stras decline years.
Frontloading a deal with an opt out I think its an interesting move for a front office to take.
Almost guarantees the player will exercise the opt out and the team is paying for prime years.
There are certainly scenarios where opt outs can mutually benefit a team down the line, though I think it's pretty clear the opt out is completely in the player's favor when they are signed. If I'm the Nats, I thank him for his services and I happily let him walk.
Cubs put Kimbrel on IL according to MLBTR.