Originally Posted by
thethe
The Facebook vp said that the overwhelming majority of the spend was after the campaign and the impact has been greatly overstated. In relation to other social media campaigns tell he russia interference is a drop in the bucket. I get you want to make it out to be pearl Harbor but the actual numbers show this was a miniscule effect. The indictment said the goal was discord and not helping trump.
So again, until muEller proves that the dnc hack was carried out by Russians I don't see what the trump campaign benefitted from.
I suppose the real question is why hasn't muEller been able to prove that? Shouldn't that have been close to step 1. Consideration received in exchange for other consideration? Sounds pretty basic to me.
Mock it all you want but Assange has said the source wasn't russia. Did he not know if his source was a derivation of russia? Maybe but Assanges word is as good as anybody right now since everyone is a liar.
You know my stance. Seth rich was a berne supporter. Saw the corruption at the DNC and wanted to show the country. So yeah, I'll take that bet with you.