he could then plausibly run for re-election on a "tough on crime" platform!
Printable View
if you think you can't find dems to agree to cut spending
then you're dumber than i thought with your thinking that the libertarian party isn't just white people being born on 3rd and thinking they hit a triple
I think this is the best place to leave this
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...e-criticism-of
“Anti-Semitism is a hateful and dangerous ideology which must be vigorously opposed in the United States and around the world. We must not, however, equate anti-Semitism with legitimate criticism of the right-wing, Netanyahu government in Israel. Rather, we must develop an even-handed Middle East policy which brings Israelis and Palestinians together for a lasting peace,” he said in a statement to The Hill.
On one hand we have the first Jewish person to win a state in a presidential primary saying it's OK to be critical of the State of Israel, on the other hand we have the President who called Neo-Nazis "very fine people" all of the sudden concerned about anti-semitism.
Lol that you actually believe that trump called neo nazis very fine people. Man, the media is so effective
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/07/mich...top-court.html
Cohen suing Trump Org for not paying him while he talked to Mueller and Congress. Trump is going to pay him for ratting in him lolololol
Tim Apple. Lol
“You had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists,” Trump said. “The press has treated them absolutely unfairly.”
“You also had some very fine people on both sides,” he said.
It’s fine, you can stick with your white supremacy and the Jews won’t replace ya homeboys who murdered someone that weekend
But he certainly stuck up for them
i love so called Freedom lover
i stated something, he then asked a question that is different than what i stated and thinks it's bull**** that i don't play his game of misdirection. it's so much fun
Goldy says he can find Dems to cut spending
I ask for examples where they actually do it
Goldy says the subject was changed
Lol
Quote:
if you think you can't find dems to agree to cut spending then you're dumber than i thought
Quote:
Can you point me to the last spending bill they sent that cut spending?
these aren't saying the same thing and you know it
and is a change of the subject
if you don't think you can find dems to cut spending you're an idiot
i know plenty that would love to cut the bloated military budget and it's wasteful spending
of course, republicans say they hate the military or some other stupid **** when that gets brought up
Trump signing bibles in a church in Alabama
Wow
let me help.
(D) in the past month thwarted an (R) attempt to wastefully spend $5B
you might want to check out Sen Warren's position papers. You can rest assured there is a lot of cost cutting in there.
Perhaps not targeted as you would like but, sending cuts all the same
(D) has not been in a position to cut spending except for a brief period post 9/11.
then a stimulus ruled the day
The broad brushes of spending bad - only (D) spends just doesn't hold water.
Unless we are willing to crash the economy by drasticly slashing the defense budget --- I am all in favor of more taxes more spending unti we can get the DOD budgeting in order.
Realistic order
It will cost money to bring defense spending down
Might want to see the economy Pres Clinton left
Certain you have pages of qualifiers and whatabouts but --- data Grasshopper - data