I guess tucker is getting O'reillys 8pm slot.
Printable View
I guess tucker is getting O'reillys 8pm slot.
Fox Force Five?
Probably not the kind Roger Ailes had in mind.
"... ketch up "
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio3000
Crap on Fox all you want but you do have to admit they have the best looking women
Unfortunately, that might be the reason why the men there have trouble controlling themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by Krgrecw
lol
nope.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garmel
worked with a lot of good looking females. it's not hard to be a good human and keep your ****ing thoughts to yourself and be professional and treat others with respect.
but nice to excuse men for their behavior though on your part. really stand up to blame the women for being good looking
I think garmel was just joking gold.
It was meant to be a joke. Geez.
hard to tell when talking to people that stand behind people that think they are just allowed to grab pussy cause they have "power"Quote:
Originally Posted by Forever Fredi
The Five in Primetime is kind of weird.
Don't watch Fox much (only at the gym when working out), but I don't know why they just don't give Dana Perino a show of her own. I find Gutfeld and Bolling to be insufferable bloviators and the left-of-center panelist, whether Juan Williams or Bob Beckel, usually ends up being a punching bag ala Alan Colmes. Guilfoyle I could take or leave. But Perino is smart and seems to think more deeply than the rest of the panel combined. I don't agree with her much, but at least her thoughts are lucid and balanced.
She has virtually no showmanship though. Not a good fit for primetime. I would have considered giving Kennedy a shot. I like Gutfeld but he belongs on shows like Red Eye. I thought Red Eye was the best show on Fox News, but it unfortunately got canceled. I can't help but think that in hindsight Megyn Kelly and FNC execs wish they could have worked something out.Quote:
Originally Posted by 50PoundHead
I love it when Bill Clinton supporters get hypocritical.Quote:
Originally Posted by goldfly
You have never seen me support Bill Clinton
But congrats on your not true example to deflect attention though
LOL! You know damn well you voted for/supported Bill so don't even try to bull****. Hell, even I voted for Bill.
i didn't vote for him
and i don't have a huge problem with Bill as president overall but he could have been better for the centrist he was and going along with the terrible gang Newt created was awful but i would say he was a pragmatist with the hand dealt to him
you still have never seen me speak or post support for Bill Clinton though and thus was my point
i have only supported 3 people in the history of this board and Bill Clinton (or any Clinton for that matter) isn't one
I will grant you that. I just think she comes off as thoughtful and that doesn't rake in the viewers anymore.Quote:
Originally Posted by weso1
Fox News doesn't—or didn't—have a Bill O'Reilly problem. It has a Fox News problem.
For years, it was clear that O'Reilly was a lying lout who exploited his position, power, and mega-profits-generating status at the network to harass women, bully critics, and hurl a variety of false accusations. Yet Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes (until last July, when he was forced out as CEO of the network as a result of his own sexual harassment conduct) allowed O'Reilly to run wild and free. As the king of the hill at Fox News, O'Reilly survived numerous scandals that would have knocked out hosts at other networks. The reason was obvious: With his top-rated show, he brought piles of cash into the network. His personal behavior at the workplace didn't matter. Nor did his penchant for public self-aggrandizing prevarication. Nor did his cavalier use of violent rhetoric, including, on at least one occasion, a death threat of sorts. (More on that later.)
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...acy-david-corn
The entire Fox News regime—which seeks to boost corporate profits by appealing to an audience supposedly in favor of conservative family values—remains tainted.