Originally Posted by
Julio3000
Some people are challenging the legitimacy of a president-elect who lost the popular vote by a substantial margin, with questions about collusion with a foreign power. For the record, I'm not one of those folks, absent some more compelling evidence.
On the other hand, Donald Freaking Tump challenged the legitimacy of a president-elect who handily won election and re-election by questioning his citizenship (with zero evidence) and suggesting that the election was stolen. How'd you feel about that?
Spare me the crocodile tears.