Lol "lost my antibodies"
So cute.
Printable View
Lol "lost my antibodies"
So cute.
Oh, yeah, I forget
You’re one of those, like that idiot in Kentucky living off his dads name, that thinks it’s like chickenpox
You get it once, you’re good forever lol
Well, people have gotten covid twice
So, yeah lol
Wtf. Take this stupid **** to your ****ty covid thread btw
Ahh darn i thought he had a scientific breakthrough!
Highlight is that Trumpkins are relying on a group that seriously calls their company Cyber Ninjas to audit the election.
Ah this article is so uninformed. A specialist has been called in to do specific procedures that a traditional audit firm would have no business doing. That’s why the report issued two months ago was worth less than the paper it was issued on. They were not certified in the field which they were asked to perform procedures. The original reports were the sideshow.
Btw, even a company like PWC, one of the largest professsional services firms in the world will use specialists because they are not experts in all fields. This is common practice in auditing. That’s why the reports previously issued were a joke because those auditors had no business opining on that field.
When the report is issued there will be plenty of ways to pick them apart and then the fun begins.
The best part is that performing post election canvassing to get a baseline of what voting patterns look like to compare to actuals is somehow voter intimidation. The idea that this is being pushed hard against speaks to how concerned they are as to what the results of the audit will be.
Voter intimidation to confirm that if a vote was cast in your name that you actually voted or if you casted a vote that your vote was actually talleyed.
These responses are telling and goes along with the theme that the maricopa election board has resisted any type of audit from the very beginning. If you don’t think anything nefarious happened then you should welcome an audit to outright embarrass people like me.
Why wouldn’t they take that opportunity?
Final note on this absurd article is that criticizing an opening list of risk assessment questions is a joke. Of course the information may exist in other firms but it is standard procedure to DIRECTLY question those responsible for a process to identify points of the process that are susceptible to error or fraud.
The idea that the board is pushing back on this is suspicious at best.
The auditors had no clue what they were doing. They just did an AUP designed to not find anything.
It was a joke but the usual suspects parroted it like it meant a thing. The purpose was to get a report out quickly before the real report was done. All PR.
They are in panic mode now.
Can we see the reporting in what this was spent on?
I watched the Q Anon 6 part series on HBO.
Was fun to see some of the Q Drops and reminisce about some of those same Q Drops thethe posted here as being legit intel.