Quote:
I'd quibble that, quite often, even "physical prompting" is not sufficient cause to draw a forceful response, depending on the context. So a question from a reporter, even if it's badgering, is leagues away from the threshold I consider necessary to merit a physical, forceful response such as that exercised by Gianforte.
Well, given how ambiguous 'depending on the context' reads, it's hard to disagree with that sentiment. Each situation should be evaluated on a case-by-base basis. I could easily see a case built for Gianforte featuring elements of self-defense (the campaign has asserted that the reporter grabbed Gianforte's wrist first ... whether it's true or not, they floated that information almost immediately) and easily explaining away the assault between campaign anxiety and the reporter marching in the office uninvited (a subtle nod to security).