I remember he and his idiots talking about how he brought respect from the world back to the office
Well, I guess he did by losing lol
Printable View
I remember he and his idiots talking about how he brought respect from the world back to the office
Well, I guess he did by losing lol
Nice to see world leaders now able to exercise their free speech without fear of retaliation from Trump.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/22/u...-election.html
More on Trumps attempt to commit voter fraud. If this stuff is true they need a third impeachment of Trump for attempted election fraud.
Trump needs them to hurry up with the impeachment trial before they find more evidence.
Trump Used ‘Apprentice’-Style Showdown to Decide Acting AG’s Fate, Report Says
After days of careful deliberation, Trump decided that this particular coup strategy wouldn't work. He opted for a more direct approach - sending an inflamed mob to attack Congress.
Yall are gonna have to move on.
There is plenty the new president is doing to be outraged about
Na
Time to hold him accountable
Then we can move on and have unity
Btw
A fraudQuote:
When Trump strengthened lobbying rules for former administration workers in 2017, he hailed it as a fulfillment of his campaign promise to "drain the swamp." In the final hours of his presidency, he apparently became a wetlands conservationist.
Start to finish
https://www.npr.org/sections/inaugur...o10kYCmmSdxRpI
What kind of strings is Trump pulling to allow himself to live at Mar a Lago after promising in writing that he'd never use it as a residence?
Imagine believing a promise from trump
It would be like trusting FB for a bet
Donald Trump invents “Office of the Former President” for himself
"That's not orange, it's gold. " FPOTUS
i'm curious, what set the precedent for trump to claim 3-5 million people voted illegally in 2016?
of course his actions this election were the democrats fault, i mean, duh. but what about that enormous lie from 2016? who can we pass the blame onto for that one?
Genuinely asking... maybe Striker can weigh in... what limitations do Presidents have with these executive orders?
How can he unilaterally decide to just steal money from people?
I’m no lawyer, but if this is correct, I find it hard to argue legally:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zackfri...h=75a550bf486fQuote:
According to Warren and Schumer, the Higher Education Act of 1965 (which is current law) provides legal authority for the U.S. Secretary of Education to cancel student loans. In their view, the president already has legal authority to cancel student loans. They reference Section 432(a) of the Higher Education Act, which grants the U.S. Secretary of Education the authority “to modify, compromise, waive, or release any right, title, claim, lien, or demand, however acquired, including any equity or any right of redemption.” Based on this, they argue that it’s unquestionable that the president (through the Secretary of Education) can cancel student loans for all student loan borrowers.
I still don’t think it’s sound economic policy, but it certainly appears legal at first glance.
Of course it is sound economic policy.
what is the greater downside ?
well, what is the greater downside ?
other than you paid yours ...
I see over a trillion dollars stimulating the economy