i still haven't gotten over a guy who hates gov't getting angry about people hating the gov't
Printable View
i still haven't gotten over a guy who hates gov't getting angry about people hating the gov't
Another crazy leftist
You are welcome to make your own thread.
The difference is majority of my examples are institutions, media, companies, and elected officials.
Your examples are random crazies
You read the story? It's buckwild. So the gated area was a common area that they claimed via squaters rights. Here's more
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/...0225dd287.html
"The McCloskeys have filed at least two “quiet title” suits asserting squatter’s rights on land they’ve occupied openly and hostilely — their terms — and claimed as their own. In an ongoing suit against Portland Place trustees in 2017, the McCloskeys say they are entitled to a 1,143-square-foot triangle of lawn in front of property that is set aside as common ground in the neighborhood’s indenture."
"Mark McCloskey has run off trustees trying to make repairs to the wall surrounding his property, insisting that he and his wife own it. In 2013, he destroyed bee hives placed just outside of the mansion’s northern wall by the neighboring Jewish Central Reform Congregation and left a note saying he did it, and if the mess wasn’t cleaned up quickly he would seek a restraining order and attorneys fees. The congregation had planned to harvest the honey and pick apples from trees on its property for Rosh Hashanah"
A bunch of litigious looneys. If you needed a portrait of what's wrong with the American Legal System they'd be near the top of it.
Two people holding guns on their own property is not a crime.
Or at least, it used to not be one.
Who knows with these nutjobs in power now
The air has cleared and revealed the McCloskeys to be the nuts they clearly were from the beginning. They have pointed their guns at neighbors, as well as brought ridiculous law suits against them. Just nut cases. And they lied to authorities about the little handgun.
A study on the cognitive dissonance it took to create this thread could be subtitled "A MAGA Hat Sucker is Born Everyday".
Nuts with guns. The protesters were on private property. But I believe the street is the private property of the homeowners association not the McCloskey's. I wonder how the courts would rule if I pointed a gun at someone on my neighbor's yard because I felt threatened by them. I suppose it would depend upon the particulars of the case. If I had a past history of such behavior it would not be helpful to my case.
These two people - who harmed nobody and simply aimed to defend themselves on their own property against and angry mob when local police were stood down - have faced far more condemnation from the left, as well as more criminal charges from the government, than actual rioters and looters who have destroyed property and killed people.
As mentioned, TLHLIM
If I pointed a gun at someone on my neighbor's yard I suppose I could argue to the judge no one was harmed. How he evaluates that claim would depend on the particulars of the case.
I don't know why you keep bending over backwards to defend this stuff.
Aren't you going on and on about silence and complicity in another thread(s)?
People trespassed on private property. There were dozens of them. There were recent events of property destruction and murder. The police were standing down.
What the **** do you want them to do? Hide under their desk and hope for the best?
Nasacpi HLHM
These damn liberals
Creating a nation of narks who hate each other is probably part of the plan