![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
zitothebrave
Bullet Trains aren't super viable for the USA. The tokyo to kyoto bullet train has about 200 miles to cover and does it in about 2 hours or so with 3 stops. Comparable distance for NYC to Boston. Which is about a 4.5 hour drive. It's a hard sell when you have so much infrastructure invested into roads and bridges.
But beyond that what will make it hell is agreeing to what would qualify for it. IMO the only half shot we have is with a hub and spoke. Hub hits major cities (or just outside) like NYC, Boston, DC, Charlotte, Atlanta, Nashville, St. Louis, Dallas, Denver, SLC, Vegas, San Fran and each of them serves as hub for regional bullet trains SF could serve Boise, Portland and Seattle, LV could serve Phoenix, LA, and San DIego, Denver and SLC don't really hub much but could probably come up with some ideas. Just can't imagine building a ton of trains through/over the rockies makes sense. Dallas could hub for OKC and the big texas cities, STL would hub Minneapolis, Chicago, Cincy, Indy. Nashville hubs, Louisville, and New Orleans, Atlanta hubs florida, Charlotte Hubs SC and and Southern VA, DC does Richmond, Baltimore NYC does Philly, Wilmington western CT and NJ. Boston covers NE cities like Providence, Portland, etc.
Problem is that's an absolute assload of cost. It isn't not unworth it of course. It could be viable but I'd doubt we'd ever as a country be willing to agree to the cost of doing it.