Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Grading Schwellenbach's Stuff

  1. #1
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,589
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,060
    Thanked in
    6,150 Posts

    Grading Schwellenbach's Stuff

    Schwellenbach made his debut, and early on he looked really good by the eye test. My old grading metrics are several years old and likely out of date for modern pitchers, so I'm going to do this a little differently and rank each aspect of his pitches compared to all pitchers who have thrown at least 10 of that pitch this season. Rather than using positive and negative values for movement, I'm going to follow Baseball Savant's convention of Vertical Movement without Gravity (which can be negative if the spin actually creates additional sink), and ARM/GLV direction for horizontal movement. Then rather than trying to grade based on standard deviation, I'll just give the rank compared to all qualifying peers.

    FA: 95.9 mph (93 of 498), 12.3" Vert (454 of 498), 5.1" Arm (392 of 498)

    This FA falls into that group of fastballs that used to confuse people 20 years ago when a guy threw hard and they couldn't figure out why he still got smashed. The movement profile on this FA is definitely an issue, and he should not be throwing it 34% of the time.

    CU: 79.9 mph (92 of 203), -4.7" Vert (173 of 203), 10.3" Glv (80 of 203)

    The CU is also nothing to write home about, and it has more slurve action than the traditional downer action we see from guys like Fried.

    SL: 86.8 mph (199 of 402), -5.1" Vert (10 of 402), 5.2" Glv (172 of 402)

    This is the pitch he will have to rely on to get guys out, and he should probably be throwing it more than 19% of the time. So far it's his only plus pitch.

    FC: 91.8 mph (30 of 206), 8.8" Vert (141 of 206), 1.8" Glv (118 of 206)

    A cutter with good velocity and mediocre movement is something that can be relied upon. I expect it will tunnel pretty well with that slider, and it will also help the 4-seamer play up.

    CH: 83.9 mph, -1.5 Vert (14 of 313), 8.3" Arm (308 of 313)

    This is a very interesting change, and it's too bad he only threw it 5 times. It seems to move like a traditional splitter with straight down movement that must appear to fall of the table. This pitch has the potential to be a real problem for hitters.

    Overall: I think what stood out on TV was the velocity and the good slider, and I commented on the slider during the game thread. It is definitely his best pitch. The FA needs to be spotted and used more sparingly while the FC and SL carry the majority of the workload. The curve doesn't seem to bring much to the table, and it's really just a slower slider, so like most pitchers who throw both there isn't really a point. If he can dial in that change the batter will have a very hard time deciding what to swing at between the slider and change.

    Without the change he's pretty much a slider specialist out of the BP. With the change at full strength he can probably turn the lineup over a couple times and be a solid 3/4. As always, elite command can make all these pitches play up, but it's too early to tell on that.

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    50PoundHead (Yesterday), jpx7 (06-04-2024), NYCBrave (06-04-2024), The Chosen One (06-04-2024), UNCBlue012 (06-04-2024)

  3. #2
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,402
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,388
    Thanked in
    3,400 Posts
    I was also intrigued by the change when I looked at the data the next day.. I can't remember exactly, but he either only threw it 5 times to one batter or 5 times only to left handed hitters. But it seemed to be a better pitch not to throw more. Could be a catcher not knowing his arsenal well enough yet.. not sure.

    I think cutter/change/slider 80% of the time could produce good results for him when on. like you said spot a velo fastball up and in to change the hitters eye level occasionally, but then live by cutting and sinking..
    Coppy

  4. #3
    Approaching Buddy Hernandez Territory
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,062
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    123
    Thanked in
    95 Posts
    My initial impression was similar, #3 or # 4 starter or a good late inning reliever. I would like to see him throw a 2 seamer.

  5. #4
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,589
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,060
    Thanked in
    6,150 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by atl717 View Post
    My initial impression was similar, #3 or # 4 starter or a good late inning reliever. I would like to see him throw a 2 seamer.
    I feel like all guys who don't get rise on their FA should switch to a 2 seamer. It literally can't be any worse than a 4 seamer with no rise.

  6. #5
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,402
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,388
    Thanked in
    3,400 Posts
    yes, I could see a 2 seamer (not a sinker) could play well with his mix.. maybe better than his cutter since that is just a harder slider that doesn't move as much. Cutter could keep RHH honest knowing if they lean out to get the slider/change then they are getting sawed off with his cutter.
    Coppy

  7. #6
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,608
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,537
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,841
    Thanked in
    2,749 Posts
    From what I have read his cutter is new. I am optimistic given how advanced he is despite so little game experience. I think his stuff can play up if he has a good pitching IQ. His pitches all come in at various speeds. Keep hitters from dialing in on one speed of pitch.
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  8. #7
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,589
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,060
    Thanked in
    6,150 Posts
    I didn't get to see this game, but it looks like he had a rough outing. Was he all over the place? Or was the 4 seamer just getting destroyed?

  9. #8
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,402
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,388
    Thanked in
    3,400 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I didn't get to see this game, but it looks like he had a rough outing. Was he all over the place? Or was the 4 seamer just getting destroyed?
    I haven't looked at the data and only watched a few innings.. but what I saw was he came out and busted a few 4 seamers at 97ish and TDA and him decided it was good.. it got destroyed shortly there after.
    Coppy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •