Results 1 to 20 of 84

Thread: Kimbrel As A Trade Candidate

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    "What is a clvclv"
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Nebo, NC
    Posts
    9,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,354
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,340
    Thanked in
    1,628 Posts

    Kimbrel As A Trade Candidate

    I know Hart's saying "it's not even being considered" but we're all well aware that he's also said they're open and looking at every option to improve. Since Jason, Justin, and Gattis were on the table, we all know better.

    Mainly starting the thread to centralize the talk about Kimbrel specifically since they're saying that the Grilli signing doesn't impact Kimbrel at all. Meta posted several recent returns in closer trades in the Grilli thread, so what would you think moving Kimbrel might net the Braves?

    If dealing him gets you a Daniel Norris, Max Pentecost, plus or Profar and Mazara coming back don't you HAVE to take the deal?

    I'd even argue that dealing Kimbrel allows you to keep Gattis - you'd likely get at least one high-ceiling arm ready to step into the rotation plus or two inexpensive offensive pieces in return.



    So no one has to dig, here's Meta's list...

    "Well here are some trades of closers:

    - The Tigers gave up Jake Thompson and Corey Knebel for Soria. So let's start there and go up.
    - The Red Sox gave up Josh Reddick + others for Andrew Bailey
    - The Angels gave up Taylor Lindsey, Jose Rondon, R.J. Alvarez and Elliot Morris for Street
    - The Diamondbacks gave up Matt Davidson for Addison Reed
    - The Phillies gave up Michael Bourn and some detritus for Brad Lidge

    So those are the starting points, but then adjust those packages up since Kimbrel is better than any of those guys."


    http://www.chopcountry.com/forums/sh...886#post180886
    Last edited by clvclv; 12-24-2014 at 09:29 AM.
    Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...

    Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?

  2. #2
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,420
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    434
    Thanked in
    265 Posts
    If the Blue Jays get desperate they'd be an ideal trading partner. Is prefer not to package Gattis and Kimbrel together, I think that negates a lot of potential value in a return.

  3. #3
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    53,758
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,022
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,224
    Thanked in
    5,864 Posts
    BJ + Kimbrel to Tigers for nothing. Let them pay the salaries... We clear about $30 million in payroll.

  4. #4
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    70,887
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,533
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,196
    Thanked in
    3,913 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    BJ + Kimbrel to Tigers for nothing. Let them pay the salaries... We clear about $30 million in payroll.
    Not sure why everyone is concerned with payroll the next couple of years. This move would have made sense prior to Justin Upton or Heyward being traded so we could lock them up. At this point salary relief doesn't help the Braves since we probably won't be competing any time soon.

    In 2 years it will be much easier to trade BJ under the following reasonsable and some not so reasonable assumptions:

    1) Salaries are going to skyrocket which makes it easier to absorb 15 million for a center fielder who can still field his position
    2) With only 2 years left going into 2017 the Braves only would have to absord a small amount to move the contract
    3) BJ could theoretically show small improvements which makes him more movable

    I just don't see any reason to trade BJ right now unless someone gives us a stupid deal. He can still play CF which is a need for us right now.
    Natural Immunity Croc

  5. #5
    It's OVER 5,000! bravesnumberone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    17,578
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,370
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,020
    Thanked in
    2,040 Posts
    If we were packaging someone with Kimbrel, would rather have done that before giving Justin away. I'd rather wait to trade Kimbrel in July. Always a couple contenders with bullpen troubles.

  6. #6
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    70,887
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,533
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,196
    Thanked in
    3,913 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesnumberone View Post
    If we were packaging someone with Kimbrel, would rather have done that before giving Justin away. I'd rather wait to trade Kimbrel in July. Always a couple contenders with bullpen troubles.
    Thats the most logical course of action. Team could potentially give up two top 50 prospects considering the dire need and how many years he's locked up on.
    Natural Immunity Croc

  7. #7
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    53,758
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,022
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,224
    Thanked in
    5,864 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thethe View Post
    Not sure why everyone is concerned with payroll the next couple of years. This move would have made sense prior to Justin Upton or Heyward being traded so we could lock them up. At this point salary relief doesn't help the Braves since we probably won't be competing any time soon.

    In 2 years it will be much easier to trade BJ under the following reasonsable and some not so reasonable assumptions:

    1) Salaries are going to skyrocket which makes it easier to absorb 15 million for a center fielder who can still field his position
    2) With only 2 years left going into 2017 the Braves only would have to absord a small amount to move the contract
    3) BJ could theoretically show small improvements which makes him more movable

    I just don't see any reason to trade BJ right now unless someone gives us a stupid deal. He can still play CF which is a need for us right now.
    Clearing $30 million in salary makes sense to me bc:

    1. BJ sucks
    2. Kimbrel won't be able to help us anytime soon

    We can use that money for someone like Cueto or Price next offseason... Or a big trade. Point is, losing Kimbrel doesn't really hurt us right now. Losing BJ clearly helps

  8. #8
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    70,887
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,533
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,196
    Thanked in
    3,913 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    Clearing $30 million in salary makes sense to me bc:

    1. BJ sucks
    2. Kimbrel won't be able to help us anytime soon

    We can use that money for someone like Cueto or Price next offseason... Or a big trade. Point is, losing Kimbrel doesn't really hurt us right now. Losing BJ clearly helps
    I'd rather not throw big money at pitching. I like the idea of continuing to develop pitching and let Roger work with them at the major league level. Its just too big of a risk to pay someone 15-20 a year and have them blow out their arm. Spend the money on positional players.
    Natural Immunity Croc

  9. #9
    Voted Worst Poster
    '13, '14, '15 (Co-Winner)
    Heyward's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    22,629
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,251
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,258
    Thanked in
    1,832 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    Clearing $30 million in salary makes sense to me bc:

    1. BJ sucks
    2. Kimbrel won't be able to help us anytime soon

    We can use that money for someone like Cueto or Price next offseason... Or a big trade. Point is, losing Kimbrel doesn't really hurt us right now. Losing BJ clearly helps
    Uggla is off the books next offseason and they can use that money on a high impact SP if thats what they choose to do. I'd prefer to sign a big-name bat, we have lots of pitching as it is.

    You dont give them away, its not like we're scrapping for dollars here.

  10. #10
    Danville Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    340
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    61
    Thanked in
    44 Posts
    I'm ok trading Kimbrel. Can't see us paying him the $15 mil+ that he will demand when he becomes a FA down the road.

    Blue Jays are rumored to want a closer, and have numerous prospects of interest: Norris, Pompey, Travis, Castro, Urena, Nay.

    I would love a deal of Kimbrel plus prospect or 2 for Norris or Pompey and then 2 of Castro/Travis/Nay.

  11. #11
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,803
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,459
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,812
    Thanked in
    2,030 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thethe View Post
    Trading the best closer in baseball who is still young and signed for a few years should get plenty in a deal. Not like trading a starter or an everyday player but Kimbrel is not your everyday closer.
    Sure but he's also not cheap which is important. Jays could have easily signed Robertson or Miller for what Kimbrell is getting paid.

    If the Jays trade for anyone, I'd be willing to be it will be for Paps, who has experience pitching in the AL East and doesn't have as much money tied to him.

  12. #12
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,661
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    795
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,496
    Thanked in
    2,332 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thethe View Post
    You can, but to rebuild a whole system through the draft takes 3-5 years at least and the Braves just could not accept that timeframe.

    Something drastic needed to be done. You just could not let talents like Heyward/Upton walk for a comp pick. If the right deal is out there for Kimbrel they will do the same but its different iwth him because he has already showed a willingness to stay on board at less than market. If the others did the same we would still have them around.
    If you could sign either J Up or Heyward, that's the optimal solution. I wouldn't sacrafice that for prospects. That's not close to worth it.

    But I think it's reasonable to take the FO's word for it that we weren't going to be able to resign them. Before anyone disputes that, just think of all the players that have left even when we were good and had reason to keep them. It's the worst part of baseball. In other sports every team keeps their best players if they want to. In baseball it's a rarity.

  13. #13
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    70,887
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,533
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,196
    Thanked in
    3,913 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chop2chip View Post
    If you could sign either J Up or Heyward, that's the optimal solution. I wouldn't sacrafice that for prospects. That's not close to worth it.

    But I think it's reasonable to take the FO's word for it that we weren't going to be able to resign them. Before anyone disputes that, just think of all the players that have left even when we were good and had reason to keep them. It's the worst part of baseball. In other sports every team keeps their best players if they want to. In baseball it's a rarity.
    I'm not sure I would have committed big time dollars to Heyward. I really want Upton here honestly. Guy has proven he can be a dynamic hitter and that is what we need. But, when it became clear those guys weren't going to extend at less than market it was time to make the smart move and trade them.
    Natural Immunity Croc

  14. #14
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,661
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    795
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,496
    Thanked in
    2,332 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thethe View Post
    I'm not sure I would have committed big time dollars to Heyward. I really want Upton here honestly. Guy has proven he can be a dynamic hitter and that is what we need. But, when it became clear those guys weren't going to extend at less than market it was time to make the smart move and trade them.
    You finally have a legit top 10 player to overrate and now you underrate him.

    Steven Adams is trolling us all rn

  15. #15
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    70,887
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,533
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,196
    Thanked in
    3,913 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chop2chip View Post
    You finally have a legit top 10 player to overrate and now you underrate him.

    Steven Adams is trolling us all rn
    Whose a top 10 player in baseball? Heyward? Seriously?

    FYI - Adams has been solid since he got healthy.
    Natural Immunity Croc

Similar Threads

  1. Kimbrel trade was as bad as any the Braves have ever made
    By chipchildress in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 08-29-2017, 11:00 AM
  2. Oprah as a third party candidate...
    By weso1 in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 05-17-2016, 12:36 AM
  3. Sanders is a better candidate than Clinton
    By weso1 in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 86
    Last Post: 01-14-2016, 09:26 PM
  4. Kimbrel/Melvin Trade Thread
    By Hawk in forum The Fredi Archives
    Replies: 582
    Last Post: 04-08-2015, 06:06 PM
  5. Kimbrel/Melvin Trade Thread
    By Hawk in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 582
    Last Post: 04-08-2015, 06:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •