Trump Trials Watch I

[Tapate50]

Not a crime, folks.

Very easy to dupe the rubes with building a big overwhelming case of legal behavior

[nsacpi]

Not a crime, folks.

agreed...his arrangement with pecker is not a crime

[Garmel]

agreed...his arrangement with pecker is not a crime

I saw what you did there.

[nsacpi]

The rape did not involve his pecker. It was due to forcible digital peneration of his victim. But that's a different case.

[nsacpi]

What the two cases have in common is neither involved pecker.

[Garmel]

The rape did not involve his pecker. It was due to forcible digital peneration of his victim. But that's a different case.

You have to believe Carroll's everchanging story (which I'm sure you're unaware because of the media you follow) to believe she was raped. As you said that a different case.

[nsacpi]

Eh. It's Judge Kaplan who said he raped her.

[Garmel]

Eh. It's Judge Kaplan who said he raped her.

Yep, while completely ignoring her original story. Also, don't get me started how her story copies a Law and Order episode even down to a dressing room at the same exact store. It's okay though. As we've seen with Carroll she can delete subpoenaed e-mail and have an unlicensed firearm and nothing happens to her. It's nice being a democrat in New Yawk.

[nsacpi]

Judge Kaplan and the jury have a better picture of the case than any of us. And they that he raped her.

[nsacpi]

y'all sure love your rapists and pedos

[Garmel]

Judge Kaplan and the jury have a better picture of the case than any of us. And they that he raped her.

I know she changed her story. Do you you know the story about her dress? Of course you don't.

Her story copies a Law and Order episode nearly verbatim.

She deleted subpoenaed e-mails.


Ever listen to her talk? She's a french fry short of a Happy Meal.

[Garmel]

y'all sure love your rapists and pedos

No, we're just more informed than you libs and we know this is a BS story.

[57Brave]

Mike Sington
@MikeSington
·
14h
“He is by himself.” Anderson Cooper and Maggie Haberman point out

Trump has no family members or friends supporting him in court, and

only two to three dozen public supporters outside. (Video: CNN)

[Garmel]

Very easy to dupe the rubes with building a big overwhelming case of legal behavior

Bragg is trying to say it is illegal and that it's a form of election interference. They went after Pecker for it. We're not talking about a real news site either. Trying to say that a tabloid actually can affect any election is laughable.

This won't hold up in the appeals process at all if they get Trump on it.

[Runnin]

No, a scheme for Fake News isn't illegal, but it's a very bad look for him and impossible to ignore.








All that talk about "fake" news, when he was the one doing it.

[cajunrevenge]

No, we're just more informed than you libs and we know this is a BS story.

Lol

[nsacpi]

No, a scheme for Fake News isn't illegal, but it's a very bad look for him and impossible to ignore.








All that talk about "fake" news, when he was the one doing it.

Fake news for thee but not for me

[nsacpi]

Mirror mirror on the wall who is the biggest disseminator of Fake news of them all

[cajunrevenge]

Bragg is trying to say it is illegal and that it's a form of election interference. They went after Pecker for it. We're not talking about a real news site either. Trying to say that a tabloid actually can affect any election is laughable.

This won't hold up in the appeals process at all if they get Trump on it.

The secondary crime is campaign finance violations not election interference, which I dont think is even a charge someone could get. The payoff counted as a political donation because it was to benefit his campaign. The falsifying business records becomes a felony when it is to cover up another crime.

[Tapate50]

I believe it was amplify bad news on opponents not falsify.

I guess the opposite of the laptop situation for msm