Lol of course you're mad about thisOriginally Posted by zitothebrave
https://www.kxan.com/news/local/aust...er-conviction/
Texas pardons convicted murderer and reinstates right to license firearm.
A great person who called BLM protestors monkeys, But I mean it's OK he had the number 1 thing republicans like. He was chatting with 16 year olds about sex
https://www.salon.com/2023/04/21/con...oung-girls/amp
Perry seems to be a creep but that doesn't change the fact that a BLM clown pointed a rifle at him. Clear self-defense.
Lol of course you want a sexual predator out on the street with a gun.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
As a George Floyd worshiper, you kay not have much room to preach here.
But Perry's "crime" was bull****. If you wanna prosecute him for being like pedo Joe, please do so
But the crime of taking down a lunatic on the subway was another example of the insane left protecting criminals over law abiding citizens
https://www.phillyburbs.com/story/ne...y/73700414007/
Apparently she hates woke being taught so much, she beats the **** out of teenagers.
"Witnesses reported that Schillinger punched an underage partygoer several times in the face during a series of outbursts by drinking adults including her then-boyfriend and mother."
ALso
"At a preliminary hearing earlier this year, an underage witness testified he took 15 shots and at one point partnered with Schillinger for a game of beer pong. Another teen witness testified that it was “common knowledge” that alcohol would be available and that "people were drinking there before.""
She is so concerned about what goes on at schools, she gets blasted with teenagers so she really knows what's going on in school. Need to stop the woke mind virus.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
https://www.propublica.org/article/m...racy-elections
My goodness, what a wild ride.
https://www.newsweek.com/texas-gop-a...ection-1904988
Texas Republicans want to rig their statewide elections by requiring a candidate to win a majority of counties to win a statewide election. Just a clear attempt to dilute the votes of the other side because they know they are losing their stranglehold on the state.
"Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.
It’s over."
Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.
It’s the same issue Colorado has dealt with.
The city people are voting on things that don’t affect them in the counties.
Ivermectin Man
This is a really stupid proposal. Loving county is less than a 100 people while Harris county is 5million. In no world should they hold same influence on state politics.
I get it, until they vote to release wolves near your cattle farm
Ivermectin Man
Isn't politics supposed to be about resolving these policy issues. There has never been a guarantee everyone would get everything they want.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
Yes, so the solution is clearly for substantially fewer country people to vote on city things that don’t affect them.
In case anybody else is willing to pretend this makes any sense, the 127 lowest populated counties add up to 913,214 people. This ostensibly means in a state of 22,000,000 people that just 457,000 people could block someone from winning statewide office. So a candidate could theoretically carry 97% of the vote in the state and not win election. That’s a bad ****ing law.
It’s actually so dumb that I’m honestly more inclined to believe the story has the proposal wrong than that this was a serious suggestion.
Last edited by mqt; 05-28-2024 at 03:03 PM.
I agree. Bad law.
On the other side. Democrats took it all the way to Supreme Court to get their political opponent thrown off ballots. So I'm not really bothered that the GOP may be finally getting in the mud
"I can't fix my life, but I can fix the world" said the socialist
Small detail: the people who brought that lawsuit were Republican voters.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
Finally getting in the mud?!
But yes, the stuff in Colorado was bad. I’d argue somewhat less bad than a proposal that effectively disenfranchises 21,000,000 people, but bad.
Last edited by mqt; 05-28-2024 at 03:10 PM.
doesn't removing the opponent effectively disenfranchise the entire state?
"I can't fix my life, but I can fix the world" said the socialist
The constitution bars a number of people from running from the presidency. In that sense it is already disenfranchising voters. Obama, Clinton, Bush cant run as former 2-term presidents. Anyone under 35 can't run. Anyone who is a naturalized citizen can't run. There was a new question about the disqualification clause and the Supreme Court addressed it, as it should have.
For an actual for real attempt to disenfranchise voters see the January 6 votes to throw out the electoral votes of Arizona and Pennsylvania.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
1) It was removing a single candidate for a single reason. Still bad, still was rightly turned down in court. Not as bad as a blanket rule like this.
2) If we really want to get into this silly of a debate, those voters could still write in Trump, whereas you cannot have your candidate win without the permission of a bunch of counties filled mostly with tumbleweeds.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote