Last edited by nsacpi; 03-22-2018 at 09:26 PM.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
it is an interesting part of background...i mentioned way back her father was a high ranking intelligence officer...this is a discussion board...so to have a friend who sees and hears information that is no available to the rest of us, it is worth doing a few posts on her background...she was not reflexively anti trump...i was anti Trump way before she was
Last edited by nsacpi; 03-22-2018 at 09:35 PM.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
I think what Mueller is looking at here is whether before he became a candidate Trump developed a financial dependency on Russians that contributed to his receptivity to certain Russian friendly political stances...not a crime necessarily
there may also be evidence of financial crimes that have nothing to do with collusion...Trumps so-called red line
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
I'll say this about the above...there something in plain sight that I would like to understand...which is why Trump is never perturbed by all the awful stuff the Russians do...there is almost a familial relationship
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
CK86 (03-23-2018)
goldfly (03-22-2018)
FFF - BB, BB, 2B, HR, 2B, HR, 1B, BB, BB, 1B, BB, BB, HR
That's not what I said.
It would have existed. But I do find it funny that the POI for tbe Genesis of the investigation has yet to be charged with anything. It's almost as if they used a false pretense to create an environment where a dossier can be introduced to justify illegal spying. So convenient.
They haven't watched him since 2013.
I can't say if he is or isn't what FBI counterintelligence suspected him of being. I can say that the lack of a charge right now isn't clear-cut exculpatory information. Here are some reasons why...
-it's possible he has been cooperating for some months, in the manner of Papa, and the public is not aware
-it's possible that there are sealed indictments with his name on them
-espionage cases often do not end in prosecution, and counterintelligence operations are more about determining means and methods and vulnerabilities and less about criminal indictments
Like I said, it's hard to know what to make of his case, but I think it's premature to say right now that he's clean. And, in general, the way this thing has unfolded, I think you'd have learned by now that "this is bogus because X hasn't happened yet" is probably a limb you don't want to go any further out on.