The idea that the SCOTUS justices always vote in blocks is misguided. When it's a big time social issue, they tend to close rank. Since those cases get the most coverage, they give the impression of two camps at war with one another.
The vast majority of SCOTUS cases are about much more technical aspects of the law and you frequently see groupings of justices that would look weird on a high profile case. For example, another case today (Albrecht) saw a 9-0 decision on a case dealing with preemption of state law in regards to drug warning labels. There was also an 8-1 decision (Tempnology, LLC) in a bankruptcy case in which Gorsuch was the only dissent.
Abortion is birth control for these irresponsible people. Grotesque
Jeff Tiedrich
@itsJeffTiedrich
21h21 hours ago
so are you telling me that when Roe v Wade is finally overturned,
the deciding vote will be cast by the guy who was so
blackout drunk all through high school that he can't remember
which women he sexually assaulted? good ****ing job, America
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
I know it's pedantic but it annoys me when people talk about over turning Roe v Wade. The current controlling case is Planned Parenthood v Casey. That's the case that would be over turned.
It may not have anything to do with morality, but millenials are having less sex.
Article: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine...ession/573949/