I think this gets at some of the issues. Each of us has our own idiosyncratic view of what free speech is. But as a practical matter, it is the courts who decide what is protected by the first amendment and what is not. So there is a certain amount of futility debating people who simply assert that free speech is being infringed. Cuz I know their definition of it is probably different from mine. And none of us gets to decide. The courts do.