https://www.axios.com/russian-twitte...f3adac542.htmlOriginally Posted by Hawk
Yes.
https://www.axios.com/russian-twitte...f3adac542.html
Yes.
Yeah ... you’ve got to make a better case than an isolated 233% jump in hashtag activity over a 48 hour period to assert that “Russian operatives” are working to “boost” Trump. That kind of blatant action would support your ‘sow discord’ theory, or a theory that Wikileaks traffics in the grey web to get viral traction.
I'm more released that this criminal conspiracy within our own borders is getting exposed. But pets not talk about those things. It's all about Russia
I've honestly made my peace with Donald Trump not going down in flames over this from the beginning. My hope is that enough of his associates go down and are removed from the federal government, and that it gets close enough to Trump so as to help reduce his influence via the 2018 and 2020 elections.
don't completely agree but this is an excellent article
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
The Russian lawyer in the Trump Tower meeting has been named in a Swiss court case involving allegations of bribery, violating secrecy laws and "unauthorized clandestine behavior."
How anyone could have thought this departure was anything but performance related is beyond me.
Natural Immunity Croc
Buried in an NBC report is Trump considering possibility of asking Sessions to prosecute Mueller.
Nothing to see.
Second Dossier announced.
This one also mentions Trump being compromised at Russian Hotel. Pee Tape.
Forever Fredi
witch hunting is a crime
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
Something something Comey
Brian Krassenstein
��
@krassenstein
7h7 hours ago
Wake Up America!!
Devin Nunes was on the Trump Transition team.
The Transition team is currently under investigation by Robert Mueller
Nunes has every reason in the world to try to delegitimize this investigation.
How could it be any clearer?!?
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Fresno Bee:
Nunes of Tulare is sheltered in a relatively safe Republican district, and may believe he will pay no political price for unfairly attacking law enforcement and protecting Trump. But his performance as chairman of the highly sensitive House Intelligence Committee has been nothing short of embarrassing.
Read more here: https://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/ed...#storylink=cpy
Last edited by 57Brave; 01-30-2018 at 04:24 PM.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
'Considering possibly of asking'
Who makes up this language and what type of source would have the knowledge to make this claim?
Natural Immunity Croc
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...-memo-n2441862
Some seem to believe that there is nothing factually inaccurate about the GOP memo.
Natural Immunity Croc
And many others believe there are factual inaccuracies.
Citing the Washington Post's latest story
Adam Serwer ��
Verified account
@AdamSerwer
The scandal appears to be that McCabe didn't act soon enough to throw the election to Trump, whose campaign was also under investigation, by making public the existence of emails the FBI later determined didn't change anything about the Clinton inquiry.
Seth Abramson
The Inspector General's report could be the turning of the tide Trump critics have waited for, as it should show what I've long said—there's proof (audio, video, tweets, emails) Flynn, Bannon, Prince, Giuliani and Don Jr. plotted to coerce Comey into re-opening Clinton's case.
I recommend that you read any attempt to paint McCabe as the villain here, and agents in New York as conscientious, as a preemptive strike against what the IG is likely to have found—which is the opposite. Comey was convinced the problem was not McCabe but the New York office.
Likewise, any claim the FBI sat on these emails to aid Clinton has it hilariously backward—throughout October, FBI agents in the NYC office (and NYPD) were leaking to Giuliani and Prince so they could *weaponize* these emails under the pretext they were new and incriminating.
Last edited by bravesnumberone; 01-30-2018 at 05:15 PM.
...at the same time they were disinclined to comment on a counterintelligence investigation involving the Trump campaign. Yeah, they were definitely in the tank for HRC.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
