You guys let me know what you figure out regarding the Constitutionality of how all this ****e works.
You guys let me know what you figure out regarding the Constitutionality of how all this ****e works.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
I just don't get why you guys are always so crude.
Y'all are like Trump.
Last edited by BedellBrave; 02-13-2016 at 11:41 PM.
weso1 (02-13-2016)
"you guys"
just finished a debate where the leading contenders have talked about carpet bombing innocent civilians, or deporting people that have llived their whole lives here or turn a blind eye to a city whre one of their fellow party people oversaw the poisoning of a city.
Not to mention the intolerance accompanying th
ohttp://www.democracynow.org/2006/5/26/enron_the_bush_connection
and you are upset cause someone said a bad word
really?
What is your job tomorrow after all ?
Scolding people or explaining the New Testament ?
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
"You guys" = you and those you like to quote.
"Carpet bombing" = wickedness
"Deporting millions" = stupid, dumb, ain't going to happen
Preaching the Scriptures - both Law and Gospel. The law which reveals our sin and the Gospel which holds out hope for sinners - including you.
Now, why always so crude?
interesting procedural take
...
"Right now, McConnell sounds like he doesn’t recognize the peril his party is in. If Obama signals that he’s willing to take advantage of the situation by taking actions like passing new environmental rules or moving for rehearing in the pending cases, he’ll put pressure on the Senate by getting what he wants without his court pick. Two-thirds of the people in the country live in blue-court America."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poste...way/?tid=sm_tw
......
2/3 of America live in blue-court America.
Never knew that
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
It's POTUS's duty and the Senate's to consider and possibly confirm. Let'm have at it.
why did McConnel make the statement ?
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Why wouldn't he? He's in the opposition party. I'd expect the same if the parties were reversed. We are talking about a huge appointment. The statement was an expected shot across the bow. Now President Obama can either go full-bore nominee to please "you guys" or instead someone who might be more tolerable. Good move by McConnell. Ball's in Obama's court now.
Why are y'all always so crude?
Last edited by BedellBrave; 02-14-2016 at 12:26 AM.
Please read the WaPo article above explaining Obama's firewall.
he can operate the way the article explains by imposing just about anything he wants unchecked with out a working Supreme Court.
In effect 1/3 of the balance of power is 50-50. Another third is so dysfunctional they can't fund filling pot holes and the other is the one being challenged
2/3 the population (voters) in blue court America. Pretty daunting number so ...
Not sure what McConnell expected to gain
I keep going back to the 2012 election and how (R) was blindsided by a landslide. By simply reading only flattery , believing only what they wish and overestimating their value
That , might be what Trump saw and learned how to harness.
Digest that phrase, blindsided by a landslide
Last edited by 57Brave; 02-14-2016 at 12:36 AM.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
cajunrevenge (02-14-2016)
I think that they should wait and let Hillary nominate Obama.
cajunrevenge (02-14-2016), goldfly (02-14-2016), The Chosen One (02-14-2016)
Not really, as far as I can tell. He's said he will appoint someone in due time. So, we don't know who or when or what he'll do in the mean time. Again, the ball is in his court and it will be interesting to watch.
One thing to bear in mind is how any selection might effect the election...