She definitely is trolling on purpose, but she's also completely serious if that makes any sense. She means what she says, but she definitely wants to enrage the left. A lot of what she has to say is great, but some is a bit over the top to me.
She definitely is trolling on purpose, but she's also completely serious if that makes any sense. She means what she says, but she definitely wants to enrage the left. A lot of what she has to say is great, but some is a bit over the top to me.
thank you weso1!
How does she "enrage the left" ??
I hear her and her followers say that often.
I am still trying to figure out who stood up for her on this board. I called her a whore mongering c...t when she ran. I still think she is, but she is doing a marvelous troll job on the libs. But in fairness Biden is on the same boat, just a tad bit more intelligent but gaff a minute comes out of his mouth like it is running water from a faucet.
Originally Posted by weso1
One line that stood out: “GOP leaders, by the way, you know, ‘The Man,’ can only ride ya when your back is bent. So strengthen it. Then The Man can’t ride ya
Who are her followers?
Seriously, you keep throwing that out.
Huh? She worse than Biden and that says a lot.
Before you thanked Wes -- did you read what he wrote.
She has over 4M Facebook likes
and over 1M Twitter followers.
and that's is only those that know how to log onto the internet
Yes I did and I agree with him on "She's clearly not qualified to be president or VP, but honestly neither is Obama or Biden."
And yes I agree with this: "But still I honestly enjoy her trolling. It's awesome." Because you are basically eating her trolling up.
I don't agree with this though: "I love her." The other parts of the post were awesome and outweighs this ludicrous line but on the other side, he might be referring to her troll job she is doing to you all, which I would agree with.
Oh, I thought you meant people on here. Well their are 4M idiots with even more idiots with the 1M Twitters. I only know two that defended her, one doesn't post much, the other is the opposite of you, defend your side till your death bed no matter how wrong you are.
Palin is more qualified to be President than Obama was in 2008.
And I'm not a "follower"
Really ?
Was it after she was confused as to the geographic classification of Africa or this ??
To my mind stating what you just did would qualify you as a "follower". Or, maybe "follower" is the wrong term. We use "follower" for Ayn Rand syncophants.
In this case perhaps "enabler" is more apt
Maybe your access to the old Scout boards would allow us to revisit the topic of Palin over the years.
Shoot - well thought of supposedly reasonable posters defended her targeting Gabby Giffords
Once toothpaste comes out the tube ...
Or that I think they're both clueless morons.
But I can play this game:
You disagree with Obama on Capital gains tax and I disagree with Palin on whether Africa is a country and the historical meaning of the Bush Doctrine.
You voted for her and the dolt that nominated her for VP -- right ?
The above is bad enough -- he advocated bombing Iran
///
and, let's all be clear - a gaffe is mispronouncing someones name or putting the verbal cart before the horse. Being clueless and out of touch is a horse of a different color.
After folllowing Ron and Rand Paul like you do, I thought you'd know the difference
Last edited by 57Brave; 01-29-2015 at 11:02 AM.
You probably have access to that board, I don't think I do. Besides, last I checked all the posts have been nuked by Paddio. I am moderating on another Scout site but that still does not give me access to the Atlanta's site regardless of my status.
I am pretty sure Sturg voted for Paul and I voted for myself and my daughter for VP. We did not have any good choices then and we don't have any good choices now.
All the stupid things Palin had said/done, and you've brought up the Gifford's target thing twice? That was a faux story from day one.
Her incarnation after her run for office seems pretty transparent to me—she's in the enriching Sarah Palin business. She has a schtick which is cloying but crudely effective. It's like she found a grade-school hagiography of Reagan and had a semi-literate meth-addled teenager translate it into cornpone soundbites for her. Her schtick is kinda comically afwul, but it doesn't enrage me. The fact that she gets a platform for it is pretty distressing, though.
I don't think so nor did the conservative intelligentsia . Probably run a graph of her popularity and my guess is that would be the tipping point where thinking (R) people began to be doubters.
Sure it was probably innocent on her part. But, not understanding the position of leadership she was anointed to -- it was a terribly irresponsible at it's worse and tone deaf to a fault.
To compare her and her verbal musings to Biden - one only has to look at this example.
Tell me Ace -- what other political figure put bullseyes on the backs of sitting Congresspeople in this day and age ?
After her explosive campaign of 2008 where some of the rallies got down right ugly -- how out of touch does one have to be to think a stunt like this is acceptable ??
Faux story indeed - pretty much Palin and her's in a nut shell
Last edited by 57Brave; 01-29-2015 at 11:15 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote