I'm waiting for real evidence trump colluded. Not circumstance all travel itinerary points. When that happens I will change my course. If you recall when the fake news of Flynn meeting with the Russians came out I admitted this is real evidence that required evaluation of my stance. I've proven I'm not ideologically stuck on this (thank fake news?).
Why does your question about if Steele knew he was working for mattered? Steele was highly motivated for trump not to be president. If Steele was as sharp as everyone has made him to be I'm sure he knew exactly who he was I directly working for. I mean, Steele did end up meeting with Bruce ohr right? Nellis ohr did work for fusion gps? Just that fact alone had to inform Steele a bit right?
The first thing to notice here is the epistemological contortions by which the DOJ rationalized concealing that the Clinton campaign and the DNC paid for Steele’s reporting. They ooze consciousness of guilt. If you have to go through these kinds of mental gymnastics to avoid disclosing something, it’s because you know that being “transparent” demands disclosing it.
LOL, well I can think of a few other people to whom this could apply.
1.The Russians sent Jr. an email. It said "Would you like to collude?"
Jr. excitedly answered, "We'd love to collude. When is good for you?"
Within a few days they met in Trump Tower and colluded.
2. Manafort called his buddy and said "I'm in position to collude. Tell the Russians."
His buddy called back and said "All is set. Let's meet next week."
They met soon and colluded.
3. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
4. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
5. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXJaredXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXChinaXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX666XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Last edited by Runnin; 02-26-2018 at 09:15 AM.
FFF - BB, BB, 2B, HR, 2B, HR, 1B, BB, BB, 1B, BB, BB, HR
nsacpi (02-26-2018)
I prefer the words collaborate and collaborator to collude and collusion...the French have some experience dealing with this phenomenon
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
This is an interesting take but kind of assumes Trump would have to do some heavy lifting.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/...mpression=true
Who is the progressive liberal writer that would be the counterpart of McCarthy over at national review?
John DeanVerified account @JohnWDean
John Dean Retweeted Ken Dilanian
Mueller is throwing everything he can against Manafort,
including Gates who can nail him. Increasingly it appears Manafort is the link
to Russian collusion. If Gates can testify that Manafort was acting with Trump’s blessings,
it’s the end of his presidency. That’s substantial.
That word "if"
.................................................. .................................................. ......................................
If in this context you don't know who John Dean is --- worth a look up
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
or he will be exonerated.
for those that need both sides spelled out
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2...mpression=true
A story underreported. How much direction was Steele given for his reporting?
Any response to McCarthys piece on the dem memo nsacpi/Julio?