We don’t even know if they are real voters. Chain of custody is sketchy in a lot of places and full audits are being refused. If the people of those states are mad they should be mad at their government for performing unconstitutional acts. The executives of these states knew exactly what they were doing.
Natural Immunity Croc
If the PA case has any substantive merit, and I don't think it does, the relief that the courts will order will be in the form of asking the state government to redo some of its election procedures covering future elections. But it is obvious to anyone looking at this that the issue motivating these lawsuits is the fact that very poorly chosen one doesn't like the outcome. It is not motivated by legal defects in the PA elections. Notice how he is not concerned with any potential legal defects in states he won. That's kind of a giveaway.
Last edited by nsacpi; 12-08-2020 at 05:16 PM.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
can we close this thread and move on.
please ?
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Let’s ignore the hundreds of whistleblowers talking about all the shady things done on Election Day.
Let’s ignore an unprecedented stop of the votes on election night and then huge sets of data updated which share no resemblance to the sets before and after.
Let’s ignore the falsified stories of a pipe burst and then video footage of votes being counted with no supervision.
I never thought you would see it differently but all the data shows that this election was flat out stolen.
Natural Immunity Croc
It is a MUCH bigger problem if even one voter has their vote tossed because of something some politician did that the voter had absolutely nothing to do with. If there is a problem with the way they are doing it, that should be addressed and changed before the next election. Hell, there was plenty of time BEFORE the election, but no one cared until Trump lost.
So what we are seeing is an attempt to overturn constitutional democracy because a candidate is unhappy with the outcome. It is a shameful thing to do. Shameful and anti-democratic.
I'm not surprised by any of it given very poorly chosen one's track record. Nor am I surprised that most of his supporters are untroubled by it. For whatever reason, most of them are happy to look the other way on his racism, misogyny and xenophobia. So it is not surprising that they look the other way or defend him when he attacks constitutional democracy.
Last edited by nsacpi; 12-08-2020 at 05:25 PM.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
https://www.npr.org/2020/12/08/94423...ggxEIzwX97bZ28
"The Supreme Court Tuesday rejected an effort to overturn the results of the presidential election in Pennsylvania, signaling that the high court would not go along with President Trump's unprecedented efforts to win another term despite a decisive popular vote and Electoral College defeat."
"The lawyers representing Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf's administration have said Kelly's claims that Act 77, which enables voters to cast ballots by mail for any reason, is unconstitutional is baseless.
"After waiting over a year to challenge Act 77, and engaging in procedural gamesmanship along the way, they come to this Court with unclean hands and ask it to disenfranchise an entire state," they wrote. "They make that request without any acknowledgment of the staggering upheaval, turmoil, and acrimony it would unleash."
The law was passed in 2019 with widespread support from Pennsylvania Republicans, who control both chambers of the state's legislature."