No one said this dude can't rap about what he wants to. But to make money from rapping about the gang in a positive way and brag about what they do is the problem.
The law is written on the books. You can disagree with the law, buts it's written right there in English as to why this guy is getting charged with this
Guess it's a moot point since the dude is a member of that gang
Last edited by Krgrecw; 11-21-2014 at 07:38 PM.
He's getting charged with it, doesn't mean it's constitutional since it's rarely been charged (maybe the first time)
For example, Obamacare was a law on the books, but the SC could have overturned it as unconstitutional. I'm pretty sure the same thing will happen to this dumb law which tramples on the first amendment.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
Such a weird mentality to have
The constitution said blacks were 3/5ths a person
The law, written in English, use to say blacks had to sit in the back of the bus, they couldn't eat at the counter etc, the law said booze was illegal during a time
Keep repeating that it is the law is a simpletons view and to say this isn't about free speech at all is just dumb
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
In what way does this affect what he can or cannot say/rap about? It is being argued (poorly might add) that he profited off gang violence. How he profited from it is not the issue that makes it a criminal act. The issue that makes it a criminal act is that he allegedly profited financially from gang violence.
And yes I agree it's a stupid law. I think we've already established that.
Last edited by Carp; 11-22-2014 at 02:21 AM.
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
Did you read what you just typed?
In what way does this affect what he can and cannot say/rap about then say that the issue is he profited financially from gang violence, which the tie in is based on what he rapped about. So it clearly is effecting what he can and cannot say. Prosecutor said this
“We’re not just talking about a CD of anything, of love songs. We’re talking about a CD [cover] … there is a revolver with bullets,” said Deputy District Attorney Anthony Campagna.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...#ixzz3JnZJwrNt
Seriously. Well that settles that, Time to go arrest Axl Rose. Afterall how many GNR albums have Guns on them? Clearly they're promoting LA Gang violence.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
AerchAngel (11-22-2014)
So in the rap world, does getting caught up in a trial like this provide the same street cred boost that taking a bullet does?
You continue to dwell on one aspect of the case when it is clearly not the reason he was arrested. He was not arrested for rapping about gang violence. I don't know why you are having an issue understanding that. He was arrested for profiting from gang violence. The DA could not care less about the manner in which he profited from gang violence.
It's probably just a ruse anyways to get him to flip on his crew to avoid jail time.
Last edited by Carp; 11-22-2014 at 02:31 PM.
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
And again, you are dwelling on the wrong aspect of the arrest. The manner in which the profit is made is not relevant under that law. It is the singular act of profiting that is illegal. And I've already agreed its a bogus law.
Last edited by Carp; 11-22-2014 at 02:40 PM.
so, you think that cali law carries more weight than the freedom of speech in the bill of rights
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
I do not. But as I said, I don't believe them to be related in this particular case since the issue at hand is profiteering, not the manner in which he profited.
Facepalm all you want. Doesn't change the fact that the reason why he was arrested was profiteering.
Gee, I hope no one in Hollywood ever makes a movie about gang violence.
AerchAngel (11-22-2014)
Ha. I remember in 2001 a found footage movie called Gang tapes came out. A few years later someone turned the clip in to CNN and they posted it on air as actual gang violence (the scene in question was a drive by scene from the movie). Cnn later apologized for airing it.
Forever Fredi
Which the evidence of that came from. Wait for it. His rapping wihch is a freedom of speech issue. History Channel has a gangland show, where they feature gangs and their most infamous acts and persons. They're profiteering off of gangs, send them to jail.
What this is, is a desperate DA hoping he will roll on someone because he's actually innocent. Classic abuse of power.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg