Page 36 of 66 FirstFirst ... 26343536373846 ... LastLast
Results 701 to 720 of 1308

Thread: Minor league thread

  1. #701
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,662
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    795
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,500
    Thanked in
    2,333 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by clvclv View Post
    Top prospect flameouts since the rebuild who have turned out to be unsuccessful are plentiful - and Grissom hasn't sniffed a Top 100 list yet. It happens - in EVERY system. At no point did I say (or have I ever said) this system has more of them than anyone else, so don't try to put words in my mouth. The Braves' flameouts tend to be more widely talked about because their hype machine is so good and they have had more kids make Top 100 lists over this stretch than most organizations. The "hits" have been great - Acuna, Albies, Riley, Fried, Dansby, Harris and Strider (so far) - but there's no need to dodge the fact that there have been more than a few pretty major (Top 100) flops.

    Jose Peraza, Christian Bethancourt, Aaron Blair, Sean Newcomb, Kolby Allard, Touki Toussaint, Kevin Maitan, Luiz Gohara, Bryse Wilson, Pache, and Waters.

    The point is that it's more than fair for people to want to see these kids succeed at higher levels against better competition before going nuts over them - there are plenty of those who were going to be "the next big thing" before they'd even reached AA.
    The pitching flame outs is pretty bad. Granted, pitchers have universally poor attrition rate, so not sure Braves are uniquely bad in that respect.

    But what the hit rates Braves have had with position player prospects by both rate and volume is historically good.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to chop2chip For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (07-06-2022)

  3. #702
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,760
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    981
    Thanked in
    766 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by clvclv View Post
    Top prospect flameouts since the rebuild who have turned out to be unsuccessful are plentiful - and Grissom hasn't sniffed a Top 100 list yet. It happens - in EVERY system. At no point did I say (or have I ever said) this system has more of them than anyone else, so don't try to put words in my mouth. The Braves' flameouts tend to be more widely talked about because their hype machine is so good and they have had more kids make Top 100 lists over this stretch than most organizations. The "hits" have been great - Acuna, Albies, Riley, Fried, Dansby, Harris and Strider (so far) - but there's no need to dodge the fact that there have been more than a few pretty major (Top 100) flops.

    Jose Peraza, Christian Bethancourt, Aaron Blair, Sean Newcomb, Kolby Allard, Touki Toussaint, Kevin Maitan, Luiz Gohara, Bryse Wilson, Pache, and Waters.

    The point is that it's more than fair for people to want to see these kids succeed at higher levels against better competition before going nuts over them - there are plenty of those who were going to be "the next big thing" before they'd even reached AA.
    I do not recall Blair, Allard, Toussaint, Maitan, Gohara, or Wilson being top 100. Of the top of my head maybe Wilson made one KLaw list. Maitan was a ton of hype, but that seemed to go away almost the moment he played.

    Peraza I do not recall being highly ranked either. We just had a bad system then.

    Bethancourt was a shocker to me b/c we were told he was a minimum a stud catcher and then we was not. Pache was super hyped by Klaw. Waters and Newcombe qualify.

    But I do think that happens to lot of teams. Probably 75% of the first round picks or more...

  4. #703
    It's OVER 5,000! Tapate50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,969
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9,232
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,748
    Thanked in
    3,926 Posts
    Thats like all the pitchers that have flamed out in like 10 years. It isn't that bad.

    Especially when you have guys like Strider, Medlen, Beachy and Venters that never sniffed a top 100 if that is your measure.
    Ivermectin Man

  5. #704
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,760
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    981
    Thanked in
    766 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Tapate50 View Post
    Thats like all the pitchers that have flamed out in like 10 years. It isn't that bad.

    Especially when you have guys like Strider, Medlen, Beachy and Venters that never sniffed a top 100 if that is your measure.
    That's my thought. Pitchers we've done well with by my definitions.

    Fried we traded for in A ball. He's a stud.
    Wright and Anderson were top picks, but they look good pitchers. We can argue about them, but Anderson probably already made his pick and development worth it in the playoffs. Wright looks to be building into a legit guy.
    Strider looks very good.
    We've also had Folty and Minter.
    Soroka hit briefly.

    I'd have to see data. I just do not know that we are that bad with our pitcher strategy.

    If we count home grown as guys who we acquired before they had any MLB service time then we assembled a WS contender with CF, RF, 3B, SS, 2B, backup C, Fried, Wright, Anderson, Strider, Minter. Obviously 1B was in that list when we won the WS. We have impact guys in that group.

    Not bad for selling off Heyward, Kimbrell, Shelby Miller, two Uptons and 4 years of being bad.

  6. #705
    Making Atlanta Great Again!
    #MAGA!

    Promises MADE, Promises KEPT!
    The Chosen One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    School of Hard Cox
    Posts
    25,454
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8,616
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9,787
    Thanked in
    5,773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thethe View Post
    No question about it. Finding three players like strider/Harris/Grissom while being a competitive team is damn impressive.
    Not to mention the players that were valuable enough to headline the Olson trade. Outside of Pache the others were from AA.
    Forever Fredi


  7. The Following User Says Thank You to The Chosen One For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (07-05-2022)

  8. #706
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,383
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    804
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,740
    Thanked in
    2,026 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesfanMatt View Post
    Trade acuna and move Riley to the OF
    Trade for Freddie to play third.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to zbhargrove For This Useful Post:

    The Chosen One (07-05-2022)

  10. #707
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    70,945
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,536
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,200
    Thanked in
    3,917 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by The Chosen One View Post
    Not to mention the players that were valuable enough to headline the Olson trade. Outside of Pache the others were from AA.
    Trade I think was centered around Shea and he was the last highest pick that AA will have for another 5-8 years.
    Natural Immunity Croc

  11. #708
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,383
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    804
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,740
    Thanked in
    2,026 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ2dollas View Post
    I do not recall Blair, Allard, Toussaint, Maitan, Gohara, or Wilson being top 100. Of the top of my head maybe Wilson made one KLaw list. Maitan was a ton of hype, but that seemed to go away almost the moment he played.

    Peraza I do not recall being highly ranked either. We just had a bad system then.

    Bethancourt was a shocker to me b/c we were told he was a minimum a stud catcher and then we was not. Pache was super hyped by Klaw. Waters and Newcombe qualify.

    But I do think that happens to lot of teams. Probably 75% of the first round picks or more...
    All of those guys were top 100 at one point. Gohara was even top 25… if he had stayed healthy he would have been good. Most of those other guys topped out around the 50-100 range. You are right on Maitan… he was top 100 but never earned it. Blair was very disappointing… he was in the 50s when we traded for him. Allard was only in the top 100 early. He fell quickly. Peraza was definitely top 100. Closer to top 50… even though the system sucked.
    Last edited by zbhargrove; 07-05-2022 at 03:38 PM.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zbhargrove For This Useful Post:

    clvclv (07-05-2022), jpx7 (07-05-2022)

  13. #709
    Making Atlanta Great Again!
    #MAGA!

    Promises MADE, Promises KEPT!
    The Chosen One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    School of Hard Cox
    Posts
    25,454
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8,616
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9,787
    Thanked in
    5,773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    Trade for Freddie to play third.
    What a team player. Moved to 3B briefly just so Adams could play 1B lol

    Like Chipper moving to LF for SVOD then for DeRo.
    Forever Fredi


  14. #710
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,383
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    804
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,740
    Thanked in
    2,026 Posts
    I remember a brief time when the Braves had Heyward as the best position prospect in baseball and Gohara as the best LHP prospect in baseball.

    Edit: Not Heyward sorry… Acuna duh.
    Last edited by zbhargrove; 07-05-2022 at 03:47 PM.

  15. #711
    It's OVER 5,000! Tapate50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,969
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9,232
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,748
    Thanked in
    3,926 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    I remember a brief time when the Braves had Heyward as the best position prospect in baseball and Gohara as the best LHP prospect in baseball.
    WOW
    Ivermectin Man

  16. #712
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    70,945
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,536
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,200
    Thanked in
    3,917 Posts
    I was so irrationally excited about Gohara when he came up here for a brief cup.

    Hope that man conquered his demons and will return one day. Legit thought he was going to become an ace.
    Natural Immunity Croc

  17. #713
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,383
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    804
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,740
    Thanked in
    2,026 Posts
    https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2018-top-100-prospects/

    2018 Fangraphs list had Gohara at 31 (Fangraphs were even the low ones on him) and Touki at 60. Allard had fallen off but was well in the top 100 in previous years. Joey Wentz was another top 100 here.
    Last edited by zbhargrove; 07-05-2022 at 03:49 PM.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to zbhargrove For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (07-05-2022)

  19. #714
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,595
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,063
    Thanked in
    6,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chop2chip View Post
    The pitching flame outs is pretty bad. Granted, pitchers have universally poor attrition rate, so not sure Braves are uniquely bad in that respect.

    But what the hit rates Braves have had with position player prospects by both rate and volume is historically good.
    I think the Braves have had a pretty amazing hit rate on position prospects, and a fairly poor hit rate on pitching prospects.

    The only true flop so far position player-wise has been Pache, and he was still used to acquire Olson. Every single other position prospect either hit as good or better than their mean projections, or folks around here pumped them up way higher than they ever should have (like Waters). I can't think of any position prospect other than Pache where I've been disappointed with the result, and that's amazing to me.

    Pitchers, on the other hand, have been pretty brutal. All the resources spent on young arms has produced a single TOR guy (Fried), a nice #3/#4 (Anderson), a guy trying to come back from injury (Soroka) and a couple guys we hope stick (Wright and Strider). Even the BP has been almost purely built from outside, so the Braves aren't even turning failed SPs into BP guys with any regularity. Turning guys like Touki and Newk into BP weapons is what organizations with good development staffs routinely do.

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    clvclv (07-05-2022), jpx7 (07-05-2022)

  21. #715
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,383
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    804
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,740
    Thanked in
    2,026 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I think the Braves have had a pretty amazing hit rate on position prospects, and a fairly poor hit rate on pitching prospects.

    The only true flop so far position player-wise has been Pache, and he was still used to acquire Olson. Every single other position prospect either hit as good or better than their mean projections, or folks around here pumped them up way higher than they ever should have (like Waters). I can't think of any position prospect other than Pache where I've been disappointed with the result, and that's amazing to me.

    Pitchers, on the other hand, have been pretty brutal. All the resources spent on young arms has produced a single TOR guy (Fried), a nice #3/#4 (Anderson), and a couple guys we hope stick (Wright and Strider). Even the BP has been almost purely built from outside, so the Braves aren't even turning failed SPs into BP guys with any regularity. Turning guys like Touki and Newk into BP weapons is what organizations with good development staffs routinely do.
    To be fair even prospect analysts were hyping up Waters a bit too irrationally early on. He was definitely my dude. Wanted him on draft day and was pumped we got him. But he sucks.

  22. #716
    It's OVER 5,000! msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    38,782
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    408
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,410
    Thanked in
    3,771 Posts
    While they certainly didn't hold up long, hard to not give some credit for folty and newcomb. They did help win a division title

  23. #717
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,662
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    795
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,500
    Thanked in
    2,333 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I think the Braves have had a pretty amazing hit rate on position prospects, and a fairly poor hit rate on pitching prospects.

    The only true flop so far position player-wise has been Pache, and he was still used to acquire Olson. Every single other position prospect either hit as good or better than their mean projections, or folks around here pumped them up way higher than they ever should have (like Waters). I can't think of any position prospect other than Pache where I've been disappointed with the result, and that's amazing to me.

    Pitchers, on the other hand, have been pretty brutal. All the resources spent on young arms has produced a single TOR guy (Fried), a nice #3/#4 (Anderson), a guy trying to come back from injury (Soroka) and a couple guys we hope stick (Wright and Strider). Even the BP has been almost purely built from outside, so the Braves aren't even turning failed SPs into BP guys with any regularity. Turning guys like Touki and Newk into BP weapons is what organizations with good development staffs routinely do.
    Not to mention guys other organizations have turned into good relief pitchers from our failed pitchers like Wisler and Sims.

    A lot of these failures on the pitching side have been known for several years now and I am sure that contributed to why AA completely revamped the scouting and player development staffs. I haven’t been overly impressed so far, but Strider and Lee both seem like keepers.

    The Braves at least seem to have a competent staff on the major league side. Seems like they do a good job managing workload and maximizing talent from the pitchers they do have. This helps smooth over the issues you can solve by simple attrition.

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to chop2chip For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (07-06-2022)

  25. #718
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,383
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    804
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,740
    Thanked in
    2,026 Posts
    The Matzek reclamation has been impressive too. I think our pitching development under AA has been better than the past regime.

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to zbhargrove For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (07-06-2022)

  27. #719
    Shift Leader CyYoung31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,917
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,032
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,127
    Thanked in
    5,582 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I think the Braves have had a pretty amazing hit rate on position prospects, and a fairly poor hit rate on pitching prospects.

    The only true flop so far position player-wise has been Pache, and he was still used to acquire Olson. Every single other position prospect either hit as good or better than their mean projections, or folks around here pumped them up way higher than they ever should have (like Waters). I can't think of any position prospect other than Pache where I've been disappointed with the result, and that's amazing to me.

    Pitchers, on the other hand, have been pretty brutal. All the resources spent on young arms has produced a single TOR guy (Fried), a nice #3/#4 (Anderson), a guy trying to come back from injury (Soroka) and a couple guys we hope stick (Wright and Strider). Even the BP has been almost purely built from outside, so the Braves aren't even turning failed SPs into BP guys with any regularity. Turning guys like Touki and Newk into BP weapons is what organizations with good development staffs routinely do.
    It’s funny, other than Glavine, Avery, Smoltz, and Millwood, the Braves have missed on almost every legit pitching prospect in the last 30+ years, while we’ve had an amazing hit rate on position players. This isn’t a new development. I always wondered why the previous regime didn’t seem to grasp how flawed a philosophy rebuilding around young pitching is, when they saw proof of it first hand from 1990-2014.

  28. The Following User Says Thank You to CyYoung31 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (07-06-2022)

  29. #720
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,383
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    804
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,740
    Thanked in
    2,026 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CyYoung31 View Post
    It’s funny, other than Glavine, Avery, Smoltz, and Millwood, the Braves have missed on almost every legit pitching prospect in the last 30+ years, while we’ve had an amazing hit rate on position players. This isn’t a new development. I always wondered why the previous regime didn’t seem to grasp how flawed a philosophy rebuilding around young pitching is, when they saw proof of it first hand from 1990-2014.
    I don’t miss dreaming on pitchers like JoJo Reyes

  30. The Following User Says Thank You to zbhargrove For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (07-06-2022)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •