jpx7 (10-16-2013)
Not sure what you mean here. Plenty of cogent arguments directly refuting thethe's initial claim have been advanced, with probably the most germane argument – made by both Julio and Gary – being that extrapolating generalities from one (seemingly foolish) lady is itself foolish, sensationalist, methodologically flawed, and does a disservice to all those who you really do depend on social supports because of circumstances beyond their doing or control.
"For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal."
I don't really see that as an argument against the OP, which just stated "This is where our money goes." That much is true. It's more like an addendum to the OP where Julio is essentially arguing that it's true, but not a big deal. The argument against the OP seems to be the hypocrisy complaint. Crumpfly grumped at me about changing the subject in another thread about FoxNews when I tried that same angle. The hypocrisy never ends.
thank you weso1!
I am really bored.
thank you weso1!
To me, that seems like a deliberate misreading of thethe's opening statements: the "this" in question, for him, is not social supports per se but the abuse thereof, hence citing such an extreme case. But that's generating generalities out of a single grain.
However, if you want to go down that road: the US federal government spends almost twice as much on "defense" as it does on "safety-net" programs. So that, even more so, is where our hard-earned money goes.
Last edited by jpx7; 10-16-2013 at 06:00 PM.
"For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal."
In the grand scheme of things, people like this lady are only a very small part of our budget problems. I also feel that we don't really have a choice, but to do what we can for those children. As for her, she is exactly the kind of reason we need to have a human spay/neuter program. I'm sorry, but people should not have more children then they can support. I'm sympathetic to poor people's rights to have a child or two, but once it gets to a certain point it's ridiculous.
As far as birth control and personal responsibility goes, yes it is something they could probably obtain. However I want it as easily and readily available as humanly possible. The government could probably save money delivering it to her door every month for free. It's in society's best interests that people who want birth control get it.
jpx7 (10-17-2013)
They don't make it a priority to get BC so they don't get it. It simply isn't a priority.
Ivermectin Man