This is such a dumb argument, and I'm not surprised it's you that's presenting it.
It's like saying "California has a larger percent of the total people in jail in America than Rhode Island does." Well yeah, there's a **** ton more people in California.
Why don't you discuss the percentage of total income the middle-class pays compared to the percentage wealthy pay? Wealthy people have far easier access to capital gains, which are taxed less heavily, therefore allowing them to pay a lower percent. They hide money to ensure it isn't taxed. This stuff isn't new.
It's hilarious to me that middle-class people defend the wealthy and their sometimes slimy practices for expanding their wealth. They would steal $100 from you the same way a bum would, but would do it in a "legal" way.
the rich have it so rough
it is a shame they barely get by here
can't believe they have stayed here
You're a freakin moron. Why shouldn't a burger flipper get $50? Because it's common sense, and no one is so stupid to suggest it. No, they don't deserve to be paid more than nurses who went to school, accountants, etc etc etc. What is the point of your continuous stupid freakin examples? All you're doing is making yourself look idiotic by bringing them in to play.
I think Ron would read your arguments and laugh at you.
goldfly (12-12-2013)
Now, if you want to raise their wage to $50 while increasing other low-income and middle-class wages to scale, I'd listen.
Sorry... I guess I wasn't clear. What % of taxes are paid by the wealthy?
And to your point about % of their total income, don't we tax rich people at a higher % on income tax?
Oh, I see. YOu want to raise capital gains tax too. What a surprise. MAKE THEM PAY MORE!!! Wahhhhhhh
ftr
i believe wages from the top should come down some
wages from the bottom to come up to at least keep up with inflation
this would also put peoples taxes closer to each other and would be "less discrimination against the rich"
Who are you to say they don't deserve more than the nurse? 57 told me that the guy who sweeps the lobby is just as valuable as the guy who sells the cars.
You're missing the point of the question. It is a serious question anot not a gotcha question. I'm asking you what would be the negatives of paying a min wage worker $50 an hour?
By the way yeezus, you're really kind of a dick.
I look forward to the day when the minimum wage is increased and thousands of employees are fired. Progress!
Just so my question is clear, can someone tell me, using economic logic, why a $50/hr minimum wage is a bad idea?
*Not looking for "dumb example" or "doesn't make sense"
Just a simple explanation on why $50 an hour would be a poor economic decision
I'm only a dick to those who severely lack common sense. Again, Ron would not like someone like you attached to his name.
No one is debating the fact that a burger flipper is an unskilled job. If your question was valid and had a point, it would be worth answering. Honestly, it's just stupid. The burger flipper would gross over 100K/year. Do you need me to explain why a skilled, scholastically trained person should earn more than a mcdonald's employee? Your silly example has no point, or not one that you've revealed. It's just stupid. That's it.
goldfly (12-13-2013)