At least the dumb comments keep coming consistently for 162 games. Well done.
goldfly (09-29-2019), salmagundy (09-29-2019)
jpx7 (09-29-2019), UNCBlue012 (09-30-2019)
Point is the 1995 team finished 100-44. 56 games over .500. That would be 110 wins in a full 162. This year's version is not even close to as good.
Lol almost every single part of that statement is incorrect...
The 1995 Braves were 90-54.
They were 36 games over .500.
That .625 winning percentage would be 101 wins over 162 games.
Further, had they actually gone 100-44, that would translate to 112 wins over 162 games.
You literally couldn’t have been more wrong.
Last edited by Enscheff; 09-29-2019 at 07:28 PM.
jpx7 (09-29-2019)
Tapate50 (09-30-2019)
The Indians went 100-44 that year. No way the Braves should've beaten them.
That was when we were in the middle of a long stretch where the best regular season team didn't win the World Series. Which really sucked, as the Braves were the best regular season team for a lot of those years.
UNCBlue012 (09-30-2019)
The obvious point being made here is that these guys are good. Judging them on their performance after they clinched and put it in cruise control is silly. This is a good team. Getting nervous because they backed it down a notch this past week and they aren’t on fire individually during meaningless games is silly. Enjoy the ride. Gonna be fun.
What are you guys so mad about in here? All of you get in a corner... don't make me take my belt off!
mfree80 (10-01-2019)