Ignoring the facts of the Peyton, I'll assume for arguments sake it's legit. Are you really going to compare what happened to covering up child molestation? Don't even try to go there.
What evidence is there that Fisher covered up a rape? I've yet to see any evidence. Similarly, for someone willing to give Schiano a pass, you seem perfectly fine with assuming Winston is guilty.
There is absolutely enough there to be concerned about hiring Schiano. So much so that even State Representatives wanted to take action against it. So much so that the White House commented on it. But people wound rather go out of their way to defend someone who allegedly covered up a child molestation. That just amazes me.
Be mad at irrational people making blanket statements (like what was written on the rock). I'm fine with that. But being concerned about someone who might have covered up child molestation is totally legit.