Thats fine, but its only 1 run and in your scenario every run counts as 2. This is where advanced statistics do a great job. People should be credited for a portion of a run if they drive on in or are the man who scored the run.
Nobody is 100% responsible for a run scored unless they hit a home run.
Natural Immunity Croc
BremanFan88 (12-07-2014)
The Chosen One (12-07-2014), thethe (12-07-2014)
Kemp was hot for the first month of 2012, and then he trailed off and got hurt. No one should be using WAR over a one month sample; basically anything can happen in one month, and WAR is designed for season long samples. This is a bad reason to discard WAR, but a good reason to ignore people using it for short periods.
It's hard to speak about tiny vague periods of time, but overall Michael Bourn was better than Matt Kemp in 2012. Bourn was average with the bat, but added a ton of value on the bases and in the field. Matt Kemp was a great hitter who was a mediocre baserunner and an atrocious defensive CF. I'm not sure which part of that is boggling to the mind. A great hitter can give a ton of value back with awful defense; see: Adam Dunn's whole career.
Can you point to a full-season example of something you consider preposterous? That would be easier, and make more sense, to discuss.
This is not true. DRS is tabulated by video scouts who time and spot each play (among a number of other things). Then those plays are compared to every other play at the same location in a season. Not hypothetical plays; actual plays. A player only gets credit for plays that other real life players failed to make. The more other players failed, the more credit he gets.
I read the statistics with some interest, but I still believe defense is the one aspect of the game that the guys in the dugouts and in the scouting boxes probably have a better idea of defensive value (or at least are closer to what the statistics bear). I think you've hit on a big portion of that in your post. Managers/coaches use a variety of criteria when positioning players for certain hitters. A premium defensive player (especially in the middle of the defense) really allows greater flexibility in the positioning of the other guys. I think the other thing that gets lost is how a pitcher's inability to pitch to the defense plays out. Sure, there's going to be mistakes, but if you've positioned your guys in a way to complement the pitcher working "outside," the defense can get crossed up by a mistake "inside." I think that's where the spectacular plays really stand out (defensive player leaning the wrong way and still recovers kind of thing).
I'm not going to poo-poo defensive stats (or offensive stats for that matter). I think good players tend to measure up and lesser players don't and there are usually numbers to support that impression. What tickles me is that it still boils down to the fact that we all like certain players and we can usually find some statistic somewhere that supports our preference. Thus it has always been. It's just a little more complex now.
Now you're just being an asshole. Why are you so vested in this?
Gerardo Parra, 2013. Also find it interesting that he's worth 4 dWAR that year, then he's minus the next year. How can I possibly figure out what to spend based on that? At $9m a WAR in ***y this off season, he was worth $36m for defense alone that year! And now he's negative? I overpaid!
He wasn't that good then and he isn't that bad now.
Your Adam Dunn comment is at the crux of my point, Meta. I don't think even The Big Donkey gave back what he created. Not even close. Cause mostly what he did was catch routine fly balls and catch throws at 1B. I know he was a ****ty fielder and I know it matters. I don't think it matters that much.
I value defense, and I've coached and played as much as anyone on here. There's something wrong with the relative weighting of offense and defense in the stat.
I don't agree with your comments. Stats should be easily understandable. It shouldn't require a whole lot of qualification.
And I'll promise you I've read 100 articles this offseason on trades, free agents, and potential deals in which the columnist blithely uses them as absolute. Kinda like the tag of the new mattress that says "don't remove under penalty of law." Doesn't work. People tear off the tag.
What a ****ty logic. You can apply that same post to offense.
Chris Davis, 2013. Find it interesting he's worth 52 batting runs that year, then he's minus the next year. How can I possibly figure out what to spend based on that? at 9M a WAR this offseason he's worth 45M in oWAR alone, now he's negative? I overpaid!
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
"For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal."