"For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal."
Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed those courses. My favorite undergrad class was in philosophy (learned more from that class than any other I have taken).
But at the end of the day, we don't produce philosophy in philosophy factories. I don't think the students majoring in those degree are naive enough to be ignorant of the harsh realities of the job market. For most I reckon they view it as the path of least resistance to getting a college degree and think they will figure the rest out in grad school.
For those that pursue those degrees for a passion of the subject matter despite the poor job market, I commend them fully. That's clean living in my book.
jpx7 (11-07-2017)
That's why a strong core curriculum is important: engineering and pre-med students and even forestry or hospitality services students should be required to take literature and philosophy and history courses, to round out their minds as much as prepare them for a job market. But, I agree: by the same token, students shouldn't just opt into humanities degrees because they think they're easier paths to graduation (and, furthermore, if they feel that way, that's a poor reflection on the institution: a degree in literature or philosophy or history should be rigorous and by no means easy).
As someone who had the curricular background and aptitude to pursue research biology or organic chemistry or medicine (or a few other "practical" options), and yet who couldn't imagine any other course in life but pursuing literary studies (and tested that supposition by purposefully trying out a few careers, finding them unsatisfying, and finally, recently, returning to the academy), I can say that it's offensive if humanities students or programs are taking these disciplines lightly. They should be, in many ways, more difficult than a lot of "hard science" disciplines.
"For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal."
I don't get how this is a problem. Art is weird and has been covered in dicks for millennia. That's not new or "leftist."
Would love to hear the details here. This seems hard to believe, at least as written. What do you mean by celebrating? Either way, celebrating 9/11 is not a "leftist" position.
On the grades, if true, that's the kind of thing that she probably couldn't get away with today. Pretty easy to cause a stink about that kind of stuff. So things are getting better?
Not sure what this has to do with "leftism." This is a NCAA/money thing.
Upthread you mentioned the specific changes you saw in people that you considered "not for the better." I would be interested in hearing more about that, the specifics of what you've observed about these people changing or being brainwashed.
Come on Meta, everything falls on a spectrum. Art doesn't need fake penises to be art, and displaying fake penises in a school hallway certainly isn't socially conservative or centrist.
I don't remember too many details. I know she started her lecture by saying that America deserved to be attacked and needed to be taught a lesson. She had a loop of the impacts playing non stop on a TV for at least part of the class. My wife dropped it the next day.
The final wasn't a joke because they were football players. The final was a joke because the entire class was a joke.
Ted Cruz says he can't support this bill
haha
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"