Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 128

Thread: DH Coming to the NL?

  1. #41
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,838
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,726
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,773
    Thanked in
    5,860 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by yeezus View Post
    Yeah, those are fair points. I don't think those things impact the game as much as a DH does, so there's something to be discussed there. But the game has shifted (literally).
    The lefty specialist and bullpen construction has certainly impacted the game in a big way. I think the DH just better optimizes your team for success. It improves your offense and defense at the same time.

  2. #42
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thewupk View Post
    The game evolves. You have pitchers now who's only job is to come in an get a left handed batter out. You have defensive replacements who are the opposite of your DH who can't hit and only play defense in the 9th inning.
    These weren't rule changes, though...just people learning to exploit areas within the presently constructed rules. The DH was not a tactical shift by players or teams; it was baseball saying, these pitchers aren't good at hitting anymore. Let's not make them do it.

    I don't like it in the same way I don't like rules designed for the sole purpose of increasing scoring in other sports. Rule changes should come about because it's become clear over time they don't work as intended, or because they just don't make sense anymore, not just because you want a basketball team scoring 110 instead of 85. Those kind of rule changes hurt the sport, IMO. You can argue the DH was an instance of a rule change because making the pitcher hit didn't make sense anymore, but we'll just have to disagree on that.

  3. #43
    It's OVER 5,000! yeezus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,108
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,501
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,720
    Thanked in
    1,122 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesfanMatt View Post
    you stole my point. I was going to say that yeezus must not like BP specialization then.
    Actually, good point: I don't like that stuff. I don't like, especially when rosters expand, the constant changing of pitchers to match up with the batters. It slows the game down and is really boring.

  4. #44
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,087
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,346
    Thanked in
    3,366 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    These weren't rule changes, though...just people learning to exploit areas within the presently constructed rules. The DH was not a tactical shift by players or teams; it was baseball saying, these pitchers aren't good at hitting anymore. Let's not make them do it.

    I don't like it in the same way I don't like rules designed for the sole purpose of increasing scoring in other sports. Rule changes should come about because it's become clear over time they don't work as intended, or because they just don't make sense anymore, not just because you want a basketball team scoring 110 instead of 85. Those kind of rule changes hurt the sport, IMO. You can argue the DH was an instance of a rule change because making the pitcher hit didn't make sense anymore, but we'll just have to disagree on that.
    it wasn't a reply to a rule change but more yeezus saying he doesn't like the idea of a guys only role is coming off the bench and hitting four times a game.

    rule changes are a whole other aspect.
    Last edited by bravesfanMatt; 10-03-2016 at 12:33 PM.

  5. #45
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,087
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,346
    Thanked in
    3,366 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by yeezus View Post
    Actually, good point: I don't like that stuff. I don't like, especially when rosters expand, the constant changing of pitchers to match up with the batters. It slows the game down and is really boring.
    yes but it works.. just like the shift works. I personally hate the 4 pitching changes per inning... but should there be a rule preventing them. I sort of like the idea of it.. but that is a complete thread jack..

  6. #46
    It's OVER 5,000! yeezus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,108
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,501
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,720
    Thanked in
    1,122 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesfanMatt View Post
    yes but it works.. just like the shift works. I personally hate the 4 pitching changes per inning... but should there be a rule preventing them. I sort of like the idea of it.. but that is a complete thread jack..
    I'm just saying, if the idea of a DH means I don't like the idea of bullpen matchups, you're absolutely right. There's things I don't like about both of them.

  7. #47
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,430
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    795
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,442
    Thanked in
    2,289 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    These weren't rule changes, though...just people learning to exploit areas within the presently constructed rules. The DH was not a tactical shift by players or teams; it was baseball saying, these pitchers aren't good at hitting anymore. Let's not make them do it.
    To elaborate on your point further (I think you're right, generally).

    The American League, at the time, was a far less profitable and attractive league at the time. The AL chose to adopt the DH as a means to attract aging stars to play in the American League (and to continue the career of the stars that they had). That ended up being a brilliant maneuver because the American League has no doubt benefited from the DH with gate-attractions like David Ortiz, Molitor, Frank Thomas, etc. finding a place on the field when they may have washed out of the league completely if there wasn't a DH.

  8. #48
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,249
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    954
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    691
    Thanked in
    488 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Preacher View Post
    But as you've said pitchers aren't going to start getting better at hitting, its not going to happen.

    Eventually the NFL said these XPs are pointless, we are moving the kick back so that something might actually happen. That's also true in baseball, people are tired of seeing (mostly) useless hitters get up there and flail around. Its not good for the sport and as many have noted having two leagues with different rules is silly if there's interleague play.
    Even though I have also accepted it as inevitable, there is still a significant opportunity for pitchers to contribute to the game offensively. Some pitchers are really good at bunting and moving runners over. A few pitchers are still good hitters. The DH completely diminishes that tool, making it useless. I like the idea of making a pitchers ability to hit, bunt and otherwise affect the game a useful part of the game. That should be rewarded, not eliminated.

    But alas, I see the opposite happening.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to mfree80 For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (10-03-2016)

  10. #49
    Approaching Buddy Hernandez Territory BlackwaterPark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,016
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    16
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    126
    Thanked in
    79 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chop2chip View Post
    To elaborate on your point further (I think you're right, generally).

    The American League, at the time, was a far less profitable and attractive league at the time. The AL chose to adopt the DH as a means to attract aging stars to play in the American League (and to continue the career of the stars that they had). That ended up being a brilliant maneuver because the American League has no doubt benefited from the DH with gate-attractions like David Ortiz, Molitor, Frank Thomas, etc. finding a place on the field when they may have washed out of the league completely if there wasn't a DH.
    Exactly this. We could have gotten 2 more years out of Chipper as a DH I bet, and he could have gotten close, if not to 500 HR's.

  11. #50
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,838
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,726
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,773
    Thanked in
    5,860 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    These weren't rule changes, though...just people learning to exploit areas within the presently constructed rules. The DH was not a tactical shift by players or teams; it was baseball saying, these pitchers aren't good at hitting anymore. Let's not make them do it.

    I don't like it in the same way I don't like rules designed for the sole purpose of increasing scoring in other sports. Rule changes should come about because it's become clear over time they don't work as intended, or because they just don't make sense anymore, not just because you want a basketball team scoring 110 instead of 85. Those kind of rule changes hurt the sport, IMO. You can argue the DH was an instance of a rule change because making the pitcher hit didn't make sense anymore, but we'll just have to disagree on that.
    It was a way to keep older players who couldn't play the field anymore to still be able to hit.

  12. #51
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,375
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,499
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,825
    Thanked in
    2,734 Posts
    I still like the idea of designated fielder in the NFL. That way you can a DH but the pitcher still has to hit because no one can field for him. Defensive highlights are great for the game. There's lots of great defenders who never make the majors.
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  13. #52
    Voted Worst Poster
    2015 (Co-Winner)
    2018 (Unanimous)
    NinersSBChamps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New Prague, MN
    Posts
    13,570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,326
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,673
    Thanked in
    1,185 Posts
    Baseball is a joke if they make the DH universal. Pitchers are baseball players too. Guess maybe we should treat quarterbacks like this too. Maybe call the play dead if they throw an interception.

  14. #53
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,273
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    773
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,701
    Thanked in
    1,992 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NinersSBChamps View Post
    Baseball is a joke if they make the DH universal. Pitchers are baseball players too. Guess maybe we should treat quarterbacks like this too. Maybe call the play dead if they throw an interception.
    We have seen it with quarterbacks... they are treated with kid gloves now. Calling the play dead when they throw an interception? That's not even close to a valid comparison.

  15. #54
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,493
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,407
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,763
    Thanked in
    1,990 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thewupk View Post
    The game evolves. You have pitchers now who's only job is to come in an get a left handed batter out. You have defensive replacements who are the opposite of your DH who can't hit and only play defense in the 9th inning.
    That isn't relatable at all. Defensive replacements still get a good amount of at bats throughout the year. And LOOGY's still face plenty of RHH.

    Pitchers are players too. They should have to hit. The AL needs to change. Not the other way around.

  16. #55
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,838
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,726
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,773
    Thanked in
    5,860 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    That isn't relatable at all. Defensive replacements still get a good amount of at bats throughout the year. And LOOGY's still face plenty of RHH.

    Pitchers are players too. They should have to hit. The AL needs to change. Not the other way around.
    While that is true they still have current jobs that didn't exist 50 years ago. Pitchers are players and their job is to pitch. The DH has been in MLB for a couple of generations now. It's more common and accepted through all forms of baseball. The NL will adopt it soon as a natural progression of the game.

  17. #56
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    14,034
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,897
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,705
    Thanked in
    4,965 Posts
    I've always been for home-team option. David Ortiz coming to town? Make him play 1B.

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    Carp (10-04-2016), Hawk (10-05-2016), The Chosen One (10-04-2016)

  19. #57
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,917
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    483
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    431
    Thanked in
    314 Posts
    Again the simplest way to make things right is to use it with games where an AL team is involved, but leave it alone inside the NL. Everybody's happy and the disadvantage disappears.

  20. #58
    It's OVER 5,000! yeezus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,108
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,501
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,720
    Thanked in
    1,122 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by VirginiaBrave View Post
    Again the simplest way to make things right is to use it with games where an AL team is involved, but leave it alone inside the NL. Everybody's happy and the disadvantage disappears.
    Wouldn't an NL team be disadvantaged when using it vs an AL team?

  21. #59
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,471
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,028
    Thanked in
    6,131 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by VirginiaBrave View Post
    Again the simplest way to make things right is to use it with games where an AL team is involved, but leave it alone inside the NL. Everybody's happy and the disadvantage disappears.
    The advantage is deeper than just inside the game being played. It spreads to the entire roster excercise of construction and the AL's ability to sign bigger FA talent because they have a full time DH position those guys can transition into.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    DirkPiggler (10-05-2016)

  23. #60
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,917
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    483
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    431
    Thanked in
    314 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    The advantage is deeper than just inside the game being played. It spreads to the entire roster excercise of construction and the AL's ability to sign bigger FA talent because they have a full time DH position those guys can transition into.
    Disagree because we don't play enough games against AL teams for that to matter. You can throw out a million, I promise I have a million and one.

Similar Threads

  1. Coming soon: A blockbuster. Maybe two.
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 08-31-2016, 06:09 PM
  2. Changes Are A Coming...
    By clvclv in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 04-20-2016, 04:25 PM
  3. Who Didn't See This Coming?
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-30-2015, 11:55 AM
  4. Wow, I did NOT see this one coming..
    By Oklahomahawk in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-25-2015, 08:30 PM
  5. Is the Offense Coming Around
    By nsacpi in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-16-2014, 10:22 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •