Also don't have any idea how the other SS would have performed. Like I said even E-bar went ballistic for a short period in the line up that was collectively hot. We could have called Johan up and he could have played better than Swanson. We could have called Swanson up and sat JT for a start. Let FF have two days off. It is insane that people are trying to paint the Swanson call up as the direct reason we are picking 5 and not 2.
Direct reason? No. There were a lot of factors that led to the Braves picking from 2 to 5. Was Swanson one of them? I would say if anyone is being honest with themselves then yes he improved the team the last month of the season. Would I rather have the #2 pick instead of the #5 pick? Yes I would. I would argue most people will be wanting that this summer as well when the joy of playing somewhat well last September has long faded. I would also want to have Swanson's age 29 season guaranteed to be with the Braves as well. We all want and say he will be extended if the Braves want to. However we also know that it doesn't always work out that way.
IMO the cons far outweigh the pros for bringing up Swanson when we did.
50PoundHead (03-31-2017)
The 2nd pick would be cool, but the 5th pick is fine. People are reacting too much to a couple draft slots in the MLB draft. Yes, it is better to pick 2nd than 5th. How much better? Ultimately it's pretty negligible.
One thing we also have to remember is that even with Dansby up, it is pretty hard to predict that team winning 20 of their last 30 games. I don't think the FO believed we could play our way down to 5.
Last edited by smootness; 03-31-2017 at 07:41 AM.
Swanson obviously helped the team get better after he was called up, but his presence didn't cause Kemp to have an OPS > 1.000 and Markakis have an OPS > .800 in September. Players want to win and after looking so terrible early in the season, there was probably extra incentive for this set of Braves to play hard to the end. These guys are professionals and they do have pride.
As for Soroka, I remember the minor eruption after he was drafted and labelled a "reach" by so many. I don't know how he'll turn out, but I tend to ignore lists at all the draft-related publications other than to get a basic idea about a prospect.
cajunrevenge (03-31-2017)
Last edited by smootness; 03-31-2017 at 08:40 AM.
In the end things like a guaranteed 29 year old season and a greater chance of picking higher in this years draft, no matter how small they are, give the Braves a better chance of being a better team in the future. Swanson coming up Sept and the team playing well does not. Teams like the Braves have to leverage everything they can to making their team better.
Yes, I don't think the braves envisioned a lot of the hitters catching fire and the team playing as well as they did. But they didn't do anything to try and slow that train down either. It's short sighted.