Hold on....are people suggesting they wouldn't trade Gattis for Price?
Hold on....are people suggesting they wouldn't trade Gattis for Price?
The Atlanta Braves signed Nick Markakis for 4/45 - Never forget 12/3/2014
"Klay Thompson > James Harden" - Heyward
"Chris Bosh is the MVP of the Miami Heat" - Heyward
"Hibbert is better than Dwight Howard"- Heyward
"Steven Adams will be a top 10 center in two years - thethe
I'd do it 30 minutes ago if that's all it took. I'd laugh myself silly though if that's all the Rays wanted.
Since 2010 Price has the 8th highest WAR of all pitchers in baseball....TB can have whoever they want. Price is exactly what we need
The Atlanta Braves signed Nick Markakis for 4/45 - Never forget 12/3/2014
"Klay Thompson > James Harden" - Heyward
"Chris Bosh is the MVP of the Miami Heat" - Heyward
"Hibbert is better than Dwight Howard"- Heyward
"Steven Adams will be a top 10 center in two years - thethe
I'm sure the Rays would ask for a ridiculous price from us. I love Price just not for the price.
If you offered Wood/Sims/CB for David Price, the TB GM may think it's April Fools
You can't just continue to operate hoping all the young players you have will develop into greatness. Sometimes you have to acquire greatness.
I dont know if anything is available that would improve attendence at Tropicana Field but Gattis could if anything. Unfortunately for Tampa, he does the same thing for Atlanta.
Can you imagine if Gattis comes out strong and starts putting up numbers, he just might start putting butts in the bleachers. His marketing value is probably the highest of any Brave I can remember.
Gives new meaning to "Chicks love the long ball".
Price has been a 4.5 per year WAR player the last three years. He's been pretty consistent, with WAR numbers of 4.3, 4.8, 4.4.
I'd expect him to continue that level of productivity for the next two years.
During the next two years, his average salary is going to be that of a 3 WAR player (about $15M/yr).
So his "surplus value" is going to be 1.5 WAR per year or 3 WAR over the next two year.
For me that's the best way of valuing a player. ymmv
For instructive purposes, I will consider what Alex Wood's "surplus value" might be.
Alex was a 1.6 WAR player this past season. He makes peanuts as a pre-arb player and will continue to make peanuts the next two years. This means his "surplus value" this year is very close to his WAR. Let's say his surplus value was 1.3 WAR.
Let's assume that Alex simply maintains the same productivity the next two years. His surplus value over the next two years will be a total of 2.6 WAR. Assuming good health, Alex will probably continue to generate some surplus value into his arbitration years.
I will stop here and let everyone draw their conclusions. Or raise objections to my approach.
PS: Dayton Moore really did get taken to the cleaners in the Shields-Myers trade. I hope the little exercise above helps to clarify why.
Last edited by nsacpi; 10-10-2013 at 02:37 PM.
DET might move Sherzer this offseason.
Ivermectin Man
NSACPI nailed it. Friedman is going to extract a gold mine for Price from some team overpaying for Price's surplus value when all is said and done... as he should (if he can get it and I suspect he will). Gattis is not going to be a centerpiece for any deal involving Price (and not because I don't like him - I do quite a bit, actually - but because Friedman would want Heyward as a starting point).
I don't want any part of Price unless we have a real opportunity to extend him at a reasonable (i.e., slightly below market) price - and I doubt that happens, Braves fan or not. Minor is essentially our version of Price, except he's a hell of a lot cheaper. I'd rather use our chits elsewhere.
Yes. Sale has a much better contract situation and more expected surplus value over the period of contractual control than Price.
But my impression is that the new GM for the White Sox is a pretty smart cookie. We're better off dealing with the likes of Towers and Dayton Moore. The Angels are another fun team to make trades with.