Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Rafael Cruz Discussion

  1. #21
    Secretary of Statistics AerchAngel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Eau Claire, WI
    Posts
    7,565
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,115
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,282
    Thanked in
    882 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    Good to see Cruz is no better than Sanders.. no principles at all
    I don't know about that. If the clownish KKK Mad Hatter actually wins against the Corrupted No Morals Lying Felon B*tch known as sHillary, getting that Supreme Court Justice is a lifetime appointment and any lawyer worth a grain of salt will think that is the crown jewel of a job. Why not swing for the fences and loyalty be damned?

  2. #22
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,001
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    368
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,204
    Thanked in
    847 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AerchAngel View Post
    I don't know about that. If the clownish KKK Mad Hatter actually wins against the Corrupted No Morals Lying Felon B*tch known as sHillary, getting that Supreme Court Justice is a lifetime appointment and any lawyer worth a grain of salt will think that is the crown jewel of a job. Why not swing for the fences and loyalty be damned?
    First of all that we must vote Repub because of the Supreme Court nominees is not a legitimate argument IMO. In theory I might say otherwise, but in the real world it means nothing, after all the Repubs controlled the White House for 28 out of the 40 years from 1968-2008, and they couldn't manage to get enough pro-life justices on there to overturn Roe v Wade (IMO the #1 argument the vote Repubs regardless crowd has) and there aren't enough Dems who ever want to get re-elected to put enough justices on there to try and mess with the 2nd amendment since that would be instant political death for any who did. The only way the 2nd amendment will ever get effed with is if enough of Congress wants to put forth a new amendment to overturn or weaken the 2nd amendment and even that would take 2/3 of them and 3/4 of the states and that simply ain't happening, Dem, Repub, or whatever.

  3. #23
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,001
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    368
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,204
    Thanked in
    847 Posts
    Oh and there's no way Trump would be misguided enough to put Rafael on the court, most of his own party wouldn't vote to confirm him.

    I'll tell you all what though, that Harriet Myers nomination by W is starting to look better and better though, with the thought of Cruz getting the nod.

  4. #24
    Secretary of Statistics AerchAngel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Eau Claire, WI
    Posts
    7,565
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,115
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,282
    Thanked in
    882 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Oklahomahawk View Post
    First of all that we must vote Repub because of the Supreme Court nominees is not a legitimate argument IMO. In theory I might say otherwise, but in the real world it means nothing, after all the Repubs controlled the White House for 28 out of the 40 years from 1968-2008, and they couldn't manage to get enough pro-life justices on there to overturn Roe v Wade (IMO the #1 argument the vote Repubs regardless crowd has) and there aren't enough Dems who ever want to get re-elected to put enough justices on there to try and mess with the 2nd amendment since that would be instant political death for any who did. The only way the 2nd amendment will ever get effed with is if enough of Congress wants to put forth a new amendment to overturn or weaken the 2nd amendment and even that would take 2/3 of them and 3/4 of the states and that simply ain't happening, Dem, Repub, or whatever.
    Great post.

    That is why vote for "No confidence" will resonate. I will stick to local elections, half and half on Pubs and Dems.

Similar Threads

  1. Cervenka & de la Cruz called up
    By nsacpi in forum Rico's Reports 2016
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-11-2016, 04:52 PM
  2. Cervenka & de la Cruz called up
    By nsacpi in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-11-2016, 04:52 PM
  3. Rafael Furcal retires
    By MadduxFanII in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-20-2015, 06:30 PM
  4. Ted Cruz
    By zitothebrave in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 11-15-2014, 12:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •