I don't understand why we're rhetorically been moaning the plight of the emigration hardliners when 2/3-3/4 of both chambers would do a DACA/border/CHIP deal.
I don't understand why we're rhetorically been moaning the plight of the emigration hardliners when 2/3-3/4 of both chambers would do a DACA/border/CHIP deal.
Uh, no I don't. Considering established links between him and members of his family (and administration and campaign) with financial criminals.
I don't know what influence Putin would have or want to have over certain domestic issues, but I do know if we had a president who was proven to be a criminal, it would show a tendency to be just as susceptible to corruption from other places on those issues.
I'm happy when anyone gets to keep more of their money. I'd be happy to talk about that any time you would like. All I know is that we are seeing real growth in this country. My field is ridiculously high in demand. Any time I want I can go find another job at 20-40K more then I am making now. Real estate guys want more money? Why should I care?
Natural Immunity Croc
http://dailysignal.com/2017/06/22/5-...s-study-finds/
Yup - Won the popular vote.
Natural Immunity Croc
Yeah, no. Who's claiming that? I said that the conservative 'strong borders' crowd earned their spot at the table. I didn't say that they should be afforded the loudest voice. Also, FWIW, more people voted for the other candidate, not the other "thing" (whatever that may be).
AMEX ain't accepted here.And, yes, I credit voices from diverse states more than those from, say, Iowa (hi, Steve King) when immigration is the topic.
Jaw (01-20-2018)
The primary responsibility should be to govern. You can maintain your core principles while recognizing there are people just as smart and qualified as you are with different opinions. So you work together. The failure to do so and insistence on finger-pointing is what helped create the environment for the **** show we have now.
Hawk is ok with all of it. I'm still a little fuzzy on how the specifics of how electing a manifestly unqualified grifter to the Presidency is going to fix our civic ills, but he's assured us that there is a master plan. So far it seems like:
1. Demystify the office by decoupling the Presidency from historical (and often specious and hypocritical) norms. So far, so good.
2. Hold the media and the political opposition to the same historical norms.
3. ????
4. Profit