It already was linked. The footnote at the bottom of the chart says June 20 Federal Elections Commission.
It already was linked. The footnote at the bottom of the chart says June 20 Federal Elections Commission.
I was surprised to see 57s chart as almost everyone reported oosoff received way more funding. You know the story. ...dems are the party of the wealthy aND elite. Just look at the funding for the 2016 presidential race.
Handel had late monies come in from various national PACs and took advantage of Citizens United related contributions.
Not the reason Ossoff lost and not worth y'all getting your panties in a wad.
Because the chart does not exist anywhere. It is fake reporting. Yet you go to the FEC site, which is up to date that counters that chart. The individual could manipulate the data to show the fake numbers. Considering that 57 common sense is 0 and a Democrat sheep turd licker it doesn't surprise me he tried to put one over people. It is his MO.
I put more credence in newspapers, the actual FEC site than some Dummicrat blogster in tweeting reports.
Now 57 is flustered because his gig is up and he is posting fake news. So he tries to play it off by deflecting.
Dude, get off the blogs and post real correct sh*t, not that fake ass stuff you have been doing.
After scrounging around the internet, nothing on this dark money, nothing on this "late" money.
He loss, quit making excuses and making up lies.
Only wad you have is what Ossoff did in your mouth. Did you swallow?
We are just asking you to quit posting fake news or WRONG news without any verifiable links. Blogs from Liberals does not constitute the truth, far from it.
I brought my links to the fight, you have a chart that has no link and that little blurb at the bottom doesn't mean sh*t.
http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2017/06...more-than-50m/
link in last paragraph
Was the source
No one here has ever spoken to you in that tone
I will admit when I am wrong and wont resort to 6th grade taunts when I am right.
Lets move on
Last edited by 57Brave; 06-21-2017 at 02:51 PM.
At a time that was supposed to indicate a rebuke of Trump's agenda. This is a bad sign for dems. If this administration gets through some legislation and the economy keeps humming then 2018 is not going to be a fun election cycle for the dems. But don't worry...the media and the establishment will keep creating polls showing how much trump is hated and how all Republicans are losing elections.
a) wasn't dark money - sorry if that is what you thought I meant. All above board and legal. Don't think anyone anywhere has insinuated otherwise
b) he lost. I think I was the first to post it wasn't looking good and like I said earlier today, Ossoff was not my ideal candidate. Better than Handel but not my cuppa tea
c) no excuses - hoped the seat went Blue - it didn't. No need to lie about a 5 point loss
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Forever Fredi
jpx7 (06-21-2017)
If we were gonna go the business route I'd probably want Elon Musk to run if he were legally eligible. There's a real self made billionaire that didn't need a million dollar loan (10 million in today's numbers).
Forever Fredi
Tom Hanks will be the Dem candidate in 2020.
Why would 79 year old Bernie want to run for President ?
It is physically demanding campaigning for President
Bernie would have lost worse than HRC
He had that Venezuela problem