I’m not saying I dislike like Newk or Gausman. This is more about the guys coming that I feel will be better than them long term (and cheaper). Gausman and Folty will not be as cheap....Gausman will be more expensive (I like Folty better anyway).
Either way, in regards to Folty and Newk...we need innings eaters. That’s the main thing missing with those two. It’s not a good idea to have two guys in a rotation that struggle to go deep in games.
Newk is my choice because he is a big left hander with great stuff under team control and is a proven MLB starter. Someone would take a chance and pay for that. Especially someone with a surplus or position players.
Having “waves” of pitchers really doesn’t matter if you just keep trading off each wave.
To me you keep the best one or two of the batch and keep bringing up young guys. This keeps payroll controllable long term.
A proven MLB starter like Newk is a better asset all day long in a trade scenario. That’s the way I would go.
Of course....I doubt that happens. The rotation will probably be Folty, Newk, Gausman, Julio/Sanchez and Touki/Fried
A big trade is coming and two of our big pitchers (and probably one big position player), will be gone....unfortunately.