Super (06-04-2019)
A good utility player is quite valuable. We've seen guys like Marwin Gonzalez, Zobrist, Chris Taylor, Kike Hernandez play important roles on championship teams. Shorter benches for position players implies you need a higher quality guy taking up most of the bench spots.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
If they drafted him as a SS then Brown is a bigger fool than I thought. Brown already said he thinks Shewmate will put bulk onto his frame. Considering his average speed, any extra bulk will almost certainly move him from SS. I've really not seen anywhere expecting him to stick at SS.
He'd honestly probably be more valuable in a super utility role than as a full time SS. He'd be too much of a liability there.
Shewmate's value will be based largely on how his power develops. All of the guys you mentioned have (or have had) 20+ HR power in their careers. If Shewmate can develop that kind of power while maintaining his hit tool and learning to play half a dozen positions, he'd have very good value.
I'm not convinced the power comes. That swing looks more like a leadoff hitter's swing than a slugger. It's going to have to be overhauled to tap into any power he develops. I don't like drafting a 21 year old in the first round and having to overhaul his swing.
Ok so we drafted JTR and Yelich....but that third pick sucks.
My comment was a direct answer to a direct question. And as usual you can't comprehend what was being discussed. I was giving him a hard time for using his daddy's credentials to legitimize himself.
Don't be mad that I'm more intelligent and a better athlete than you. It's OK, you can still own your failed Braves blog that nobody has ever read.
There were about 30 names we discussed at 9. You probably talked about 20 of them. I, and many others, also discussed Lango at 9. You didn't figure anything out...you never do.
Last edited by Enscheff; 06-04-2019 at 11:01 AM.
Debate is fun and the draft is particularly fun because of the volume of new additions to talk about.
And Shewmate isn't a SS. You can justify the pick far better by embracing the utility role and saying he'll develop at the plate enough to be Zobrist than sticking to him being a SS.
i wish this forum allowed you to completely block a poster, seeing none of what they say.
the incessant whining is too annoying and it's 50% of each page of the thread.
"Well, you’ll learn soon enough that this was a massive red wave landslide." - thethe on the 2020 election that trump lost bigly
“I can’t fix my life, but I can fix the world.” - sturg
Since I’ve never watched them play I won’t comment on the players taken. However, I am disappointed with the overall strategy. Drafting a near ready D first catcher makes some sense to me since the organization is thin there and with the DH most likely coming to the NL the need for a great hitting C is reduced. My disappointment is not taking a HS kid with high potential with the 21st or 60th pic. The strategy was too conservative in my opinion.
Overall this draft looks weak. It will be interesting to seem who emerges as the best of the class.
I wanted the Braves to draft Jerrion Ealy. The kid is a beast on the football and baseball field.
Plus all the MS State guys here would love it because that takes him from Ole Miss.
DirkPiggler (06-04-2019)
Langeliers, I'll admit, is by far the most justifiable pick. He went a couple spots higher than most had him ranked but that stuff happens on draft day. My only point was it wouldn't have shocked anyone if he'd gone 18. Langeliers seemed to be more in the 10-20 range of the draft. Still, I can live with this pick.
Shewmake made much more sense if we'd gone overslot in the second round. He was not where most thought he would go. The Braves definitely jumped on him sooner than the majority. There might have been another team or two that had him in their 20's but the consensus was second rounder. Somewhere between 40 and 60. So not a shock to go at 21 but well sooner than expected.
I think the first two picks are pretty much justifiable whether there is consensus agreement about them as individual players or not. I'm just not getting the 2nd rounder at all. Glad to be wrong if he turns out to be a good player.
What is probably throwing a lot of people off (myself included) is the apparent change in organizational thinking about the draft post-Coppolella (and by extension Clark and Bridges).
jpx7 (06-04-2019)