Page 53 of 94 FirstFirst ... 343515253545563 ... LastLast
Results 1,041 to 1,060 of 1868

Thread: - STARTS TODAY AT 7PM - 2016 June Amateur Draft Discussion

  1. #1041
    It's OVER 5,000! Hudson2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,694
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    956
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,455
    Thanked in
    1,123 Posts
    I like Puk to but I wouldn't take him 3rd if he was there, but I think he'll be gone before we pick anyways.

  2. #1042
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,061
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,858
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,340
    Thanked in
    3,362 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    It looks like the consensus around here has moved to a top 3 of Groome, Senzel and Lewis, with the discussion mainly being how to rank them.
    I think everyone agrees that we either want a Bat or the best pitcher in the draft at #3..

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to bravesfanMatt For This Useful Post:

    NYCBrave (05-20-2016)

  4. #1043
    Where's My Cup of Coffee?
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    1,182
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    297
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    419
    Thanked in
    221 Posts
    I'll be honest, I really don't care what position we draft for; I think 'organizational need' should always be incredibly low when it comes to drafting baseball players.

    Just get the player that you believe has the highest chance of being an impact player. It'll sort itself out.

    Baseball is 100% about the accumulation of assets, whoever has the most usually wins. If our scouts think a guy like Groome is an A type prospect and Lewis is a B+ type guy, I want Groome.

    Drafting for need makes sense in football/basketball (to a degree) - but in baseball with the way you can flip assets and the minor league system, just get the most talented players and let everything else work itself out.

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Preacher For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (05-20-2016), nsacpi (05-20-2016), NYCBrave (05-20-2016)

  6. #1044
    Where's My Cup of Coffee? KB21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,176
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    130
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    388
    Thanked in
    232 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Preacher View Post
    I'll be honest, I really don't care what position we draft for; I think 'organizational need' should always be incredibly low when it comes to drafting baseball players.

    Just get the player that you believe has the highest chance of being an impact player. It'll sort itself out.

    Baseball is 100% about the accumulation of assets, whoever has the most usually wins. If our scouts think a guy like Groome is an A type prospect and Lewis is a B+ type guy, I want Groome.

    Drafting for need makes sense in football/basketball (to a degree) - but in baseball with the way you can flip assets and the minor league system, just get the most talented players and let everything else work itself out.
    Agree.

    Right now, I would draft based on upside. My top 4 would be:

    Kyle Lewis
    Jason Groome
    Riley Pint
    Mickey Moniak

    I'm just not comfortable with taken an "eh" guy in Senzel or Ray with the 3rd pick.

  7. #1045
    Where's My Cup of Coffee? KB21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,176
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    130
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    388
    Thanked in
    232 Posts
    As a die hard Bulldog, I have to throw this out.

    Dakota Hudson's last 3 starts:

    26.1 IP
    98 batters faced
    18 hits
    2 runs (1 earned)
    3 walks
    27 strike outs
    340 total pitches (230 strikes)
    0.34 ERA

    I'm biased, but I would take Hudson over Puk.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to KB21 For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (05-20-2016)

  9. #1046
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,584
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    261
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,546
    Thanked in
    1,492 Posts
    Puk faces LSU tonight on the SEC Network. I think we should be rooting for Puk until the draft. That should lock him into one of the top two spots, most likely at number one, and then gives us a lot of guys that are better fits.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to CJ9 For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (05-20-2016)

  11. #1047
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    14,034
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,897
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,705
    Thanked in
    4,965 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CJ9 View Post
    Puk faces LSU tonight on the SEC Network. I think we should be rooting for Puk until the draft. That should lock him into one of the top two spots, most likely at number one, and then gives us a lot of guys that are better fits.
    Hard to believe that Shakespeare's Robin Goodfellow is going to be one of the top picks in next month's draft.


  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (05-20-2016), yeezus (05-20-2016)

  13. #1048
    Where's My Cup of Coffee? KB21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,176
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    130
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    388
    Thanked in
    232 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CJ9 View Post
    Puk faces LSU tonight on the SEC Network. I think we should be rooting for Puk until the draft. That should lock him into one of the top two spots, most likely at number one, and then gives us a lot of guys that are better fits.
    Ah, man. I have to pull for LSU. Florida needs to lose for Mississippi State to win the SEC.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to KB21 For This Useful Post:

    smootness (05-20-2016)

  15. #1049
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,584
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    261
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,546
    Thanked in
    1,492 Posts
    Jim Callis posted his new mock at MLB.com. http://m.mlb.com/news/article/179142...icid=151437456

    Puk goes 1, he says their backup plan is Moniak.

    He has Cincy taking Senzel, and says they're deciding between Senzel and Perez.

    Atlanta takes Lewis at 3. He also says we prefer Pint over Groome, which seemingly everyone else in the industry seems to disagree with.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to CJ9 For This Useful Post:

    NYCBrave (05-20-2016)

  17. #1050
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,449
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,025
    Thanked in
    6,128 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by KB21 View Post
    Agree.

    Right now, I would draft based on upside. My top 4 would be:

    Kyle Lewis
    Jason Groome
    Riley Pint
    Mickey Moniak

    I'm just not comfortable with taken an "eh" guy in Senzel or Ray with the 3rd pick.
    From what I am reading by Ben Chase over at Tomahawk Take (who claims to have scouting connections), the Braves agree with you. They do not have Senzel or Ray as options for the #3 pick. According to Chase, the only college hitter the Braves have in their top 5 hitters is Lewis, who is supposedly number 1. The other hitters are Moniak, Rutherford and Perez.

    Chase also claims there is some chatter about the Braves somehow getting 2 of their top 5 HS bats. No idea how likely something like that would be though.

  18. #1051
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,061
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,858
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,340
    Thanked in
    3,362 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    From what I am reading by Ben Chase over at Tomahawk Take (who claims to have scouting connections), the Braves agree with you. They do not have Senzel or Ray as options for the #3 pick. According to Chase, the only college hitter the Braves have in their top 5 hitters is Lewis, who is supposedly number 1. The other hitters are Moniak, Rutherford and Perez.

    Chase also claims there is some chatter about the Braves somehow getting 2 of their top 5 HS bats. No idea how likely something like that would be though.
    wonder who their top 5 bats are.. Moniak/Perez/Benson/?/?

    maybe still working a trade for the another draft pick to over slot two of them at #30 something and #40

  19. #1052
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    14,034
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,897
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,705
    Thanked in
    4,965 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CJ9 View Post
    Jim Callis posted his new mock at MLB.com. http://m.mlb.com/news/article/179142...icid=151437456

    Puk goes 1, he says their backup plan is Moniak.

    He has Cincy taking Senzel, and says they're deciding between Senzel and Perez.

    Atlanta takes Lewis at 3. He also says we prefer Pint over Groome, which seemingly everyone else in the industry seems to disagree with.
    Nice scenario. Lewis scares me a bit, but you have to roll the dice sometimes. Even with all the pitching we have, I'm still not sold on the depth at the lower levels, so Pint or Groome wouldn't be a bad choice either. But I think we all agree that we have a paucity of power bats up and down the minors.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (05-20-2016)

  21. #1053
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,449
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,025
    Thanked in
    6,128 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesfanMatt View Post
    wonder who their top 5 bats are.. Moniak/Perez/Benson/?/?

    maybe still working a trade for the another draft pick to over slot two of them at #30 something and #40
    According to the guy on tomahawk take their top 5 is Lewis, Moniak, Perez, Rutherford, and someone else. He doesn't know who #5 is.

    I meant they are trying to get 2 of the top 5 I listed if Lewis is not available at 3. If Lewis is there he is the pick, period.

  22. #1054
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,584
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    261
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,546
    Thanked in
    1,492 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    According to the guy on tomahawk take their top 5 is Lewis, Moniak, Perez, Rutherford, and someone else. He doesn't know who #5 is.

    I meant they are trying to get 2 of the top 5 I listed if Lewis is not available at 3. If Lewis is there he is the pick, period.
    If that two of the top five thing is true, I'd think it would have to be Will Benson. Kiley actually had Benson 15 overall in this draft class before he left Fangraphs, and most mocks have him in the late 20s or early 30s. It's not crazy to imagine he falls to 40, especially since we can probably offer significantly over slot there.

  23. #1055
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    14,034
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,897
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,705
    Thanked in
    4,965 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    According to the guy on tomahawk take their top 5 is Lewis, Moniak, Perez, Rutherford, and someone else. He doesn't know who #5 is.

    I meant they are trying to get 2 of the top 5 I listed if Lewis is not available at 3. If Lewis is there he is the pick, period.
    Moniak appears to have passed Rutherford in most eyes, but that doesn't necessarily mean he is ahead of him in the Braves' eyes. BA mentions the Braves having interest in Josh Lowe, so he's probably the other high school bat. He is consistently ranked ahead of Benson (and Benson scares the stuffings out of me).

  24. #1056
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,449
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,025
    Thanked in
    6,128 Posts
    Here is what he said about who the 5th guy might be in the comments section:

    http://tomahawktake.com/2016/05/16/a...omment-replies

    "I'll be honest that I don't have the 5th. I know Lewis is the only college bat on their list, but I didn't get definite info on who the 5th is. I'm pretty sure with you on those first 4. We know the Braves like their local guys, so it could be Lowe, Benson, Trammell (please no), or Kieboom."

  25. #1057
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Here is what he said about who the 5th guy might be in the comments section:

    http://tomahawktake.com/2016/05/16/a...omment-replies

    "I'll be honest that I don't have the 5th. I know Lewis is the only college bat on their list, but I didn't get definite info on who the 5th is. I'm pretty sure with you on those first 4. We know the Braves like their local guys, so it could be Lowe, Benson, Trammell (please no), or Kieboom."
    Well, someone else said you can just about pencil in Kieboom at 40 or 44 to the Braves, so it may him and the Braves are confident he'll be there for them, which is why they think they can get 2 of their top 5 bats.

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to smootness For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (05-20-2016)

  27. #1058
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,449
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,025
    Thanked in
    6,128 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    Well, someone else said you can just about pencil in Kieboom at 40 or 44 to the Braves, so it may him and the Braves are confident he'll be there for them, which is why they think they can get 2 of their top 5 bats.
    Makes sense that he is probably #5 then. I wouldn't be shocked to see the Braves come out of the draft with Moniak and Kaboom if Lewis is off the board.

    I don't like the idea of Rutherford being in HS at age 19 and not absolutely dominating. At that age he is literally a man among boys, and he isn't even leading his team in HRs. No thanks at 3.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 05-20-2016 at 03:07 PM.

  28. #1059
    It's OVER 5,000! Tapate50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,429
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9,087
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,709
    Thanked in
    3,896 Posts
    A guy like Kieboom would be a really explosive name for Chip to play with. Also- great baseball name as Weso says
    Ivermectin Man

  29. The Following User Says Thank You to Tapate50 For This Useful Post:

    Freshmaker (05-20-2016)

  30. #1060
    Where's My Cup of Coffee? KB21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,176
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    130
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    388
    Thanked in
    232 Posts
    AJ Puk left the game tonight after 2 innings. He had thrown 36 pitches, walked 2, and only struck out 1. Reports say it may be a stomach issue.

Similar Threads

  1. JUNE 2019 PRE-DRAFT TOP 30 PROSPECTS (NEW NO. 1!)
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 06-19-2019, 11:11 AM
  2. June draft order finalized
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 01-26-2017, 08:59 AM
  3. 2016 NFL Draft Discussion Thread
    By CrimsonCowboy in forum Fulton County Fire & BBQ
    Replies: 133
    Last Post: 05-21-2016, 09:37 PM
  4. 2016 Baseball Hall of Fame Discussion
    By The Chosen One in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 111
    Last Post: 02-27-2016, 12:22 PM
  5. June Rule IV pre-draft Thread
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 183
    Last Post: 06-08-2015, 06:08 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •