NinersSBChamps (04-29-2014)
I'm utterly surprised we played like we did against the Marlins tonight. I didn't see the game, but I heard that Doumit was awful in the field and Alex just didn't bring it at all. Anything else I could get from a loss like this? Well, and Fernandez is the man.
If there are no objections..I will make the GDT for tomorrow.
UNCBlue012 (04-30-2014)
/eye roll
Something tells me at 9-0 the players have something to do with it. I thought it was creative; worth a shot. Pretty sure Alex Wood gave up 7 and Fernandez was ice.
Maybe the next time we face Fernandez you should manage the club, Dalyn. How do you think you'll do?
Hawk (04-30-2014), NinersSBChamps (04-30-2014)
You do know they have scored 28 more runs than we have this year right? The pitching that you are so impressed with has given up 35 more runs than the Braves have. So it is really the opposite of what you said for the fish. None of that is on Fernandez as he is a beast. He has given up earned runs in only 1 game this year. The Phillies roughed him up for 6 on April 11th. Since then he has given up 0 earned runs in 23 innings, 16 of those innings was against us.
I dislike Fredi as much as anyone on here but I do not blame him for this loss.
Fernandez is someone we're going to have to deal with all year. In order to get better against him, you need to get more at bats against him. Instead of giving the Uptons 48 at bats against him, we give Schafer and Doumit those at bats. It's just dumb.
By the way, Justin was in a groove. Now he's had two days off.
Dalyn (04-30-2014)
I obviously can't quantify anything. My point is a hitter is likely to have more success the more he sees a pitcher. Do you disagree?
I was laughing at Chip last night when he said "The toughest thing for a pitcher to do is to face a team in back to back starts. I would imagine facing this lineup is even tougher than that!" Then Joe says "It's like he's facing a different team."
Exactly. If there is truth to the "tougher to face a team 2 straight starts," then Fredi basically took that advantage away from us.
Also, if you're Justin, BJ, CJ, and Uggla, doesn't a part of you get a little pissed off that your manager think Tyler Pastornicky has a better shot at performing than you agianst one of the game's best?
With regards to your second question, I think this is common sense. If a hitter is in a groove and is seeing the ball well, the last thing he wants is a day off, let alone two.
Hawk (04-30-2014)
The positive effect giving the bench a game against Jose Fernandez is that they can all go back to the bench with 0-fers
Whatever the result, I would argue four at bats against a major league pitcher is the same in terms of helping a bench hitter get a little sharper. As I said we are arguing about some pretty small effects here. That's really the only point I have to make as to the future consequences of the lineup choices made last night.
What is Doumit's virtue? He can't catch. He can't play the OF. He might be serviceable at 1B the 10 or so games Freddie might miss this season. The Braves are usually so adept at constructing their bench with an almost unexpected balance of defensive whizzes and potent bats, but Doumit stinks up the whole joint -- especially when you consider what they are paying him.
The rationale is he brings some power to our bench. Other considerations: he is a switch hitter, he can catch albeit badly, which allows use of Gattis as a pinch hitter when he is not in the lineup.
Terdoslavich provides all of the above except the catching part at lower cost. Plus he is more acceptable defensively in the outfield. But the Braves love having a couple vets on the bench. Doumit follows in the tradition of Hinske, Diaz, Reed Johnson, Ross, Laird.