Page 60 of 92 FirstFirst ... 1050585960616270 ... LastLast
Results 1,181 to 1,200 of 1828

Thread: 2019 MLB Draft Thread

  1. #1181
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,484
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    19
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    762
    Thanked in
    517 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    That’s easily the dumbest way of evaluating a prospect I’ve ever seen.
    Lol. What's your fantastic scouting report? I do agree however that judging him on hitting Mize...seems like a silver lining but there is that...

  2. #1182
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Allan is taking quite the tumble right now.

  3. #1183
    Very Flirtatious, but Doubts What Love Is. jpx7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,908
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    47,825
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6,442
    Thanked in
    3,830 Posts
    The Dodgers’ second pick (Michael Busch) honestly sounds more exciting than Shewmake, as a MIF prospect.
    "For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal."

  4. #1184
    Voted Worst Poster
    '13, '14, '15 (Co-Winner)
    Heyward's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    22,616
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,251
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,258
    Thanked in
    1,832 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BeanieAntics View Post
    Allan is taking quite the tumble right now.
    Saw he had some signability issues on twitter.

  5. #1185
    It's OVER 5,000! CrimsonCowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Outskirts Of Mobile, Alabama. Roll Tide!!!
    Posts
    14,189
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    490
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6,365
    Thanked in
    2,808 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    For real grades, sure. For way too early judgments based on our own impressions of these players, it's never too early.
    Yes, it is too early. You can do an early draft grade in the NFL and the NBA, because the teams in those leagues are depending on the players to make an immediate impact in the following season. Players in the MLB Draft are at least two or three years typically from making any impact. So there’s no sense in trying to immediately grade a MLB Draft, unless you enjoy making yourself crazy.
    Chopping With The Braves And Rolling With The Tide

  6. #1186
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    14,034
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,897
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,705
    Thanked in
    4,965 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Heyward View Post
    This is fair but if OF is set with Waters/Pache/Acuna and IF is set with FF/Albies/Swanson/Riley, cant just pick pitchers with every other pick.
    As striker said, you just can't pick for need in the baseball draft. As sturg said, it's the most difficult sport to project future success.

    To your point, Waters and Pache are striking out more than me in a bar during my younger days (I don't go to bars anymore, but I would still likely strike out), so I'm not planning on them being consistent contributors quite yet. You certainly wouldn't draft guys to automatically replace them, but our lower minors are currently a wreck largely due to the international sanctions and there is plenty of opportunity for guys to take time to develop, which would be the argument for higher ceiling/higher risk guys. Maybe those types are coming. I just thought they should have gone for someone like Carroll at #9.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    Jaw (06-03-2019), jpx7 (06-03-2019)

  8. #1187
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    14,034
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,897
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,705
    Thanked in
    4,965 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jpx7 View Post
    The Dodgers’ second pick (Michael Busch) honestly sounds more exciting than Shewmake, as a MIF prospect.
    He's a Minnesota kid and supposedly cannot field a lick.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (06-03-2019)

  10. #1188
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,648
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,201
    Thanked in
    2,050 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    There isn't a perfect player at pick 21. Everyone has flaws. I'm just glad we got 2 hitters. And it isn't like these guys weren't rated highly. Both were drafted right around were they were projected to go.


    Would I have rather went Carroll and Allan/Malone? Sure. But honestly, we know so very little about these players. Might as well trust the scouts
    Agreed that no player is perfect at 21. However, most players at that range don't have flaws that make them very difficult to project at any position.

  11. #1189
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,469
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,027
    Thanked in
    6,130 Posts
    I think it’s fair to criticize Lango and Shew at 9/21

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    50PoundHead (06-03-2019), jpx7 (06-03-2019)

  13. #1190
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,648
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,201
    Thanked in
    2,050 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CrimsonCowboy View Post
    Yes, it is too early. You can do an early draft grade in the NFL and the NBA, because the teams in those leagues are depending on the players to make an immediate impact in the following season. Players in the MLB Draft are at least two or three years typically from making any impact. So there’s no sense in trying to immediately grade a MLB Draft, unless you enjoy making yourself crazy.
    I'm posting on an internet Braves forum. That I enjoy making myself crazy is a given.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to striker42 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (06-03-2019)

  15. #1191
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,484
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    19
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    762
    Thanked in
    517 Posts
    There’s never an Atlanta teams draft where I don’t find myself saying wtf at first glance. Then I calm down and accept I can’t do jack about it. I need an AA meeting. Alcohol or Alex ASAP!

  16. #1192
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,648
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,201
    Thanked in
    2,050 Posts
    After a glass of whisky and some time to cool down, I'm raising my grade from an F to a D.

    We drafted two hitters and neither project as big time bats or even has a superstar ceiling.

    Our number 9 pick is praised for pitch framing in an era where robot umps are being discussed.

    Our number 21 pick doesn't seem to have a position.

    Honestly, the most likely scenario is we drafted two future bench players. The only thing preventing this from being a F is the low bust risk for Langeliers. He's as close to guaranteed to play in the majors as you can get. For that this draft is a D.

  17. #1193
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,584
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    261
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,546
    Thanked in
    1,492 Posts
    3.5+ hours for 32 picks. And still 46 picks left tonight. This pace is a disaster.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to CJ9 For This Useful Post:

    Jaw (06-03-2019)

  19. #1194
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,484
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    19
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    762
    Thanked in
    517 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    After a glass of whisky and some time to cool down, I'm raising my grade from an F to a D.

    We drafted two hitters and neither project as big time bats or even has a superstar ceiling.

    Our number 9 pick is praised for pitch framing in an era where robot umps are being discussed.

    Our number 21 pick doesn't seem to have a position.

    Honestly, the most likely scenario is we drafted two future bench players. The only thing preventing this from being a F is the low bust risk for Langeliers. He's as close to guaranteed to play in the majors as you can get. For that this draft is a D.
    I like this unfortunately.

  20. #1195
    Voted Worst Poster
    '13, '14, '15 (Co-Winner)
    Heyward's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    22,616
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,251
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,258
    Thanked in
    1,832 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CJ9 View Post
    3.5+ hours for 32 picks. And still 46 picks left tonight. This pace is a disaster.
    Clock shortens next round i think.

  21. #1196
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts
    This Braves draft just looks....lazy

    The odds that a non can't miss catcher ever makes it are very low. Hell, taking ANY catcher is likely a longer shot than HS pitching. I would feel differently if the upside were "could be Rutschman if the hamate injury heals 100%" then I might could get behind it. But that's not it. His upside is "very good defense with a reasonable offensive game." For me, I'm more of a true upside person for a first round pick. Sure, you'll bust more but when you hit the payoff is huge. And if you don't believe that your going to hit on a pick then you're in the wrong business.

    Langeliers is like the somewhat homely potential date leading up to the SR prom - a great personality and a little gray on reputation.

    But, just when you've convinced yourself that there may be method to the madness, the Braves take the college shortstop equivalent of Langeliers at 21.

    Sooner or later, you're just hoggin'

  22. #1197
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,584
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    261
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,546
    Thanked in
    1,492 Posts
    Malone would’ve been ideal at 21.

  23. #1198
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    528
    Thanked in
    406 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I think it’s fair to criticize Lango and Shew at 9/21
    I can see Lango I guess...I mean...ok (I would not have picked him).

    Shew...nope. Hate that pick. Do not understand it...at all.

  24. #1199
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,484
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    19
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    762
    Thanked in
    517 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CJ9 View Post
    Malone would’ve been ideal at 21.
    That was my choice or Espino

  25. #1200
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    528
    Thanked in
    406 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Deester11 View Post
    That was my choice or Espino
    I thought Espino would have balanced out the high risk with high floor ....

Similar Threads

  1. JUNE 2019 PRE-DRAFT TOP 30 PROSPECTS (NEW NO. 1!)
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 06-19-2019, 11:11 AM
  2. CrimsonCowboy’s 2019 NFL Mock Draft
    By CrimsonCowboy in forum Fulton County Fire & BBQ
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-10-2019, 11:06 PM
  3. 2019 MLB Draft Thread:
    By bravesfanforlife88 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02-05-2019, 08:25 PM
  4. 2019 MLB Draft Order
    By CrimsonCowboy in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 10-02-2018, 04:30 PM
  5. Official Draft Day, Post-Draft Thread
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 745
    Last Post: 07-17-2017, 09:52 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •