https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalex.../#6c8bf72e33d9
Forbes reposts 1990 investigation into Trumps wealth.....
"Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.
It’s over."
Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
So his reported losses were fraud and he's actually a good businessman that earned money. Or lawl-omg he's a bad business man and lossed money and the losses are not fraudulent.
Which one is it? Of course it's both with you people.
He wrote about his losses in Art of the Comeback. They are well documented.
But muh russia.. muh obstruction.. muh tax fraud.
Nice echo chamber you're trapped in, bro.
For those who have interest in understanding how Trump was able to survive his losses here is a dated and somewhat speculative but still informative article.
http://money.com/money/4553067/trump...ess-practices/
It goes without saying there is a compelling public interest in having Trump's taxes released from several perspectives. One is simple due diligence that voters need to undertake with respect to people running for high office. Another is the need to understand what happened and how the IRS interpreted the law in his particular case. Transparency is more than a slogan in this particular instance.
Last edited by nsacpi; 05-09-2019 at 02:51 PM.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
Judge is fast-tracking Trump's attempt to quash the subpoena of his financial records.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/09/polit...ena/index.html
Seems kind of unfair to me that an immigrant from a ****hole country gets to be the judge in such an important case. A Gujarati no less.
Last edited by nsacpi; 05-09-2019 at 04:18 PM.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
No. The point is, when someone says something that's incredibly racist and hateful like that, the correct response is complete and absolute comdemnation of those remarks.
The correct response is most certainly NOT "Theres definitely a small subset of people crossing the border that should be shot."
That statement, especially by itself, makes it seem like you are ok with the original comment or, at the very least, indifferent of it.
no one should be randomly shot -- no matter.
Finding justification is "deplorable"
whatever the justification
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
The Boston Globe
Verified account @BostonGlobe
The White House misspelled the Red Sox as "Red Socks"
on its website ahead of today's visit. http://bos.gl/jbLNQ9z
Lawrence O'Donnell
Verified account @Lawrence
7h7 hours ago
Lawrence O'Donnell Retweeted The Boston Globe
Spelling like this is the way they used to catch Soviet spies.
Last edited by 57Brave; 05-09-2019 at 06:53 PM.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.