The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
This is in effect tax hike on the middle class
But you knew that
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Of course it is paid. But if you are being taxed to invest that is an out of pocket expense.
If you are being taxed 20-30 years down the road the interest absorbs the tax
Believe me, it is a right now reality in my house.
Hard to believe you favor such a scheme
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
57Brave (10-22-2017)
or raised revenues on those not having to mortgage their next 10 years to build an addition to the house
or spending the cash to put braces on the kids teeth on taxes that can be paid later with interested monies
or buying a car to replace a 10-15 year old.
This is a horrible idea
On so may levels
.............................
The 1% are the 1% not by accident.
Few are lottery winners
Last edited by 57Brave; 10-22-2017 at 08:47 AM.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Spending cuts are a thing of the past sadly. Nobody is able to risk the poitical fallout from the MSM if you cut spending aside from the military.
The average person is not materially impacted by this change. If you make 75k and invest 6% of your earnings that is 4500. Therefore, 2100 is subject to tax at your respective tiered rates. Now add back in the increased standard deduction and you are in the positive in terms of tax savings.
This change more impacts people that make 100k-250k.
Jaw (10-23-2017)
you tell me -- I am not making our argument for you.
If you have a point make it
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
People making 50K can less afford the out of pocket tax than the your $250 example.
$1000 is more to ones making $50K than $20K is to those making $250
Relative to income
yes it does impact the lower bracket more
In the end , for the $50K person and the $250K person ---- it is a tax hike on the middle class
.........................
So you paying out of your pocket taxes so Trump/Kochs/Mercers etal can lower theirs.
that seems the intent.
No, that is the intent
Last edited by 57Brave; 10-22-2017 at 09:03 AM.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
what other provisions.
My understanding is the bill isn't even written yet
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
This is ace's introduction to the topic.
So what off sets are you talking about ?
American worker I don't think they are talking about $250K earners.
Though yes it too impacts them.
How about people in Trumps range or , supposed range.
This would be a great opportunity for you and his apologists to see his tax returns to learn how much you, his voters will pay to finance his self purported
income and golden cammode
Last edited by 57Brave; 10-22-2017 at 09:13 AM.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
So you're comfortable talking about this which is not final but not about the increased standard deduction which is not final? Have some consistency man.
I am not at all comfortable - actually it makes me crazy watching people willingly lose money to shell games.
Like I said, I am about ready to cash out so it won't effect me. Personally
This is a horrible idea
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Funny seeing 57 though complaining about tax increases... when he's been begging for more revenue for years