Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 75

Thread: Grading the Braves' Four-seam Fastballs (FA)

  1. #21
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    18,946
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,856
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,329
    Thanked in
    3,353 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I have Wisler as: 50 FA, 40/45 SI, 50 CU, 55/60 SL, 45/50 CH

    That is a lot of usable pitches. His BB/9 suggests he is capable of average or slight below average control. That should combine for a back end SP, but his xwOBA values (.364, .334, .371) show he is awful.

    Seems to me he's a guy another team might be able to "fix". Of course "fix" means back end SP, but that's a lot better than what he is now.
    I felt his ceiling was a #3.. But that would be great. I don't know if it is a lack of focus, coaching, him being cocky, ability or a combo of it all.. but he makes so many bad pitches that just kill him.
    Coppy

  2. #22
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by 50PoundHead View Post
    Thanks for all the hard work enscheff. Could you do a comparison of Fried and Kuechel? Watching both of them pitch, I see some similarity. Braves have brought Fried along slowly after his surgery, so I don't think we've seen everything from him yet. That said, he clearly has some work to do if he's going to be a contributor in the starting rotation.

    What becomes more clear to me in this series of posts is that we have to go with the first wave of younger guys to begin next season to actually see what we have. I don't think September baseball means a whole lot. We need extended looks on Fried and Sims and I'd even throw Wisler out there for one last go at it.
    I have Keuchel with: 25 FA (rarely used), 40 SI, 55 CU (rarely used), 65 SL, 55 CH and a FC (cutter) I would grade about a 45.

    He's a junk-baller with plus control that produced a .279 xwOBA in 2017. I would not sign him long term if I were the Astros. Or maybe as a junk-baller he will age well. Hard pitcher to figure out...a lot like Rich Hill.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 11-01-2017 at 11:44 AM.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    50PoundHead (11-01-2017)

  4. #23
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    13,994
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,887
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,678
    Thanked in
    4,941 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I have Keuchel with: 25 FA (rarely used), 40 SI, 55 CU (rarely used), 65 SL, 55 CH and a FC (cutter) I would grade about a 45.

    He's a junk-baller with plus control that produced a .279 xwOBA in 2017. I would not sign him long term if I were the Astros. Or maybe as a junk-baller he will age well. Hard pitcher to figure out...a lot like Rich Hill.
    It's too early to tell, but Fried may be one of those guys who has to pitch backwards and those types can be dicey. Like you point out, for every Hill or Kuechel, there's a massive pile of discarded pitchers.

  5. #24
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by 50PoundHead View Post
    It's too early to tell, but Fried may be one of those guys who has to pitch backwards and those types can be dicey. Like you point out, for every Hill or Kuechel, there's a massive pile of discarded pitchers.
    Main differences are Keuchel throws 6 pitches (4-5 of which are usable) and has plus control, while Fried throws 3 pitches (1 of them being barely usable) and has poor control.

    I think the key for Fried will be to add the SI as a usable pitch and tighten up the control. He is nearing the age where those kinds of changes are becoming hard to make.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    50PoundHead (11-01-2017)

  7. #25
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Rich Hill is another very interesting example. He has horrible velocity on every single one of his pitches, but the movement he gets on all of them makes them useful (a lot like Glavine). The Dodgers were able to identify his ability to spin a baseball years ago, which is why they acquired him.

    Pitch: velo, velo grade, X, X grade, Z, Z grade, Overall Grade
    FA: 89.3 34.59 7.1 61.02 10.4 61.45 48.89
    SI: 87.3 27.64 11.1 72.63 4.6 54.61 45.63
    CU: 74.1 36.74 9 76.61 -7 62.93 62.99
    SL: 77.2 21.32 5.7 66.82 -2.4 68.89 63.32
    CH: 5.2 37.60 7.8 50.76 7.4 39.87 39.13
    CU: 85.4 38.32 1.2 48.77 6.5 39.41 42


    Look at the horizontal movement on that SI (11.1"). It moves so much it acts like a screwball moving away from RHers and likely plays much better than it's 45 grade indicates.

    Look at the nearly elite horizontal movement on that CU (9"). Huge sweeping action away from LHers makes it play up to closer to a 65 grade pitch.

    HUGE movement on the SL. Plus movement on the FA that make it average overall.

  8. #26
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,135
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    766
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,672
    Thanked in
    1,967 Posts
    Awesome post and analysis Enscheff... gives me some more optimism on Newcomb

  9. #27
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    Awesome post and analysis Enscheff... gives me some more optimism on Newcomb
    The question with Newk has always been his control and how likely he is to significantly improve upon it at the age of 24 (and now 25 in 2018).

    If we don't see the BB/9 rate improve to ~4 in 2018 I don't think anyone can reasonably expect him to ever improve his control before his stuff starts to decline so much that it doesn't matter anymore.

    His production as a function of BB/9 for the next few years will likely follow something along the lines of:

    5 BB/9 = #4 SP
    4 BB/9 = #3 SP
    3.5 BB/9 = #2 SP
    3 BB/9 = #1
    2.5 BB/9 = CYA candidate

    Looking at other 24 year olds with this poor of command, the odds of him getting to 3.5 BB/9 is fairly remote.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 11-01-2017 at 03:06 PM.

  10. #28
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,135
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    766
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,672
    Thanked in
    1,967 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    The question with Newk has always been his control and how likely he is to significantly improve upon it at the age of 24 (and now 25 in 2018).

    If we don't see the BB/9 rate improve to ~4 in 2018 I don't think anyone can reasonably expect him to ever improve his control before his stuff starts to decline so much that it doesn't matter anymore.

    His production as a function of BB/9 for the next few years will likely follow something along the lines of:

    5 BB/9 = #4 SP
    4 BB/9 = #3 SP
    3.5 BB/9 = #2 SP
    3 BB/9 = #1
    2.5 BB/9 = CYA candidate

    Looking at other 24 year olds with this poor of command, the odds of him getting to 3.5 BB/9 is fairly remote.
    I know at his age, its a long shot, but the data still gives me some optimism.

  11. #29
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Eyeman View Post
    Thanks Enscheff. Which fastball does Wisler throw the most and where do they rank please? For sure you can see those stats in action. Folty seems to have great stuff, but they hit it when his command is off. They kill Teheran and Wisler when their control is off.
    Here are Winkler's pitches in the order he throws him:

    Pitch velo, velo grade, X, X grade, Z, Z grade

    FC: 90.9 59.93 0.1 39.32 5.5 47.70

    His cutter has plus velocity and below average movement. This is probably a grade 55 pitch.

    FA: 94.1 53.72 -4.4 45.69 8.8 47.64

    His four-seamer has above average velocity and below average movement. Probably a grade 50 pitch.

    SL: 83.1 43.55 3.3 54.35 0.1 57.02

    The slider has above average movement. This is a grade 55 pitch.

    SI: 93.9 57.73 -8.6 51.50 6.4 45.77

    The sinker has good velocity and slightly below average movement, a grade 55 pitch.

    CH: 4.8 35.71 -8.4 55.03 1.4 64.24

    His change doesn't have good velocity delta, but it has plus movement that probably make it is grade 50 pitch overall.

    So it looks like Winkler has 5 average or better pitches. He was a SP with the Rockies, so it stands to reason he might be a decent candidate to be stretched out and given another chance to start.

  12. #30
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    the question waa about Wisler, but I'm glad to see an analysis of Winkler's potential as a starter. He is obviously a high injury risk which might keep him in the pen. But he does have the repertoire to potentially be a starter. He has some deception which makes his stuff play up.

  13. #31
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    For the sake of completeness, here are Minter's 2 pitches:

    FA: 96.5 69.06 4.9 48.54 9.9 57.14

    Excellent four-seamer. This is a grade 70 pitch, ranking only behind Viz and Gohara on the Braves roster.

    SL: 90.5 78.59 -1.3 43.93 3.8 39.42

    His "slider" seems to be misidentified. It has elite velocity and below average movement. It is probably better described as a:

    FC: 90.5 61.78 -1.3 49.70 3.8 61.95

    Classified as a cutter, this pitch has plus velocity, average run, and plus sink. This is a grade 60/65 pitch either way you slice it.

    Minter pairs a 70 FA that breaks arm side and rises with a 60/65 FC that breaks glove side and sinks. These 2 pitches probably tunnel together very well, and are extremely hard for hitters to tell apart, especially when geared up for 96-97. He probably doesn't have elite command like he showed at the MLB level, but even average command will make Minter a nightmare out of the BP.

    He just has to stay healthy...
    Last edited by Enscheff; 11-01-2017 at 06:02 PM.

  14. #32
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    the question waa about Wisler, but I'm glad to see an analysis of Winkler's potential as a starter. He is obviously a high injury risk which might keep him in the pen. But he does have the repertoire to potentially be a starter. He has some deception which makes his stuff play up.
    Hah, so it is. I did break down Wisler though too.

    "I have Wisler as: 50 FA, 40/45 SI, 50 CU, 55/60 SL, 45/50 CH

    That is a lot of usable pitches. His BB/9 suggests he is capable of average or slight below average control. That should combine for a back end SP, but his xwOBA values (.364, .334, .371) show he is awful.

    Seems to me he's a guy another team might be able to "fix". Of course "fix" means back end SP, but that's a lot better than what he is now."

  15. #33
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    69,574
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,507
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,179
    Thanked in
    3,898 Posts
    Thank you for all posts Encheff. Great read and encouraging for Newk.

  16. #34
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,772
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,491
    Thanked in
    1,150 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    The question with Newk has always been his control and how likely he is to significantly improve upon it at the age of 24 (and now 25 in 2018).

    If we don't see the BB/9 rate improve to ~4 in 2018 I don't think anyone can reasonably expect him to ever improve his control before his stuff starts to decline so much that it doesn't matter anymore.

    His production as a function of BB/9 for the next few years will likely follow something along the lines of:

    5 BB/9 = #4 SP
    4 BB/9 = #3 SP
    3.5 BB/9 = #2 SP
    3 BB/9 = #1
    2.5 BB/9 = CYA candidate

    Looking at other 24 year olds with this poor of command, the odds of him getting to 3.5 BB/9 is fairly remote.


    I think guys have done this over the years. It's not especially likely, but not unheard of for guys with talent. I think of guys like David Wells, Sterling Hitchcock, Jimmy Nelson who did master some 23+ wildness.

    I think Newcomb has clean innings that often seem to be followed by innings where he falls apart. I don't know if it is conditioning, mechanics, or immaturity. I guess he will get a lot of chances to let that arm talent play. Braves have little else to do.

    I agree that Wisler might be fixable for someone and I think that is a trade that needs to be made for his sake as much as the Braves. I'd be completely unchecked if he checked in down the road as a quality starter in San Diego or St Louis or something.

  17. #35
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    I think guys have done this over the years. It's not especially likely, but not unheard of for guys with talent. I think of guys like David Wells, Sterling Hitchcock, Jimmy Nelson who did master some 23+ wildness.

    I think Newcomb has clean innings that often seem to be followed by innings where he falls apart. I don't know if it is conditioning, mechanics, or immaturity. I guess he will get a lot of chances to let that arm talent play. Braves have little else to do.

    I agree that Wisler might be fixable for someone and I think that is a trade that needs to be made for his sake as much as the Braves. I'd be completely unchecked if he checked in down the road as a quality starter in San Diego or St Louis or something.
    The issue is we saw a LOT of pitchers take steps backwards this year. In fact, I would say ALL Braves pitchers disappointed this year.

    Teheran's control worsened. Colon's control worsened and then improved with the Twins. Newk didn't improve his control one bit at the MLB level in 100 innings. Folty didn't improve at all. Wisler has the raw stuff to be moderately successful, but somehow got even worse. Fried needs to ditch the FA and pick up a SI. Sims has a couple useful pitches that might be leveraged into some SP success.

    Those things (control/command, sequencing strategy, pitch refinement) are the things a pitching coach is responsible for. We didn't see any of that from the Braves this year, and I think that has to fall on the shoulders of the coaching staff.

    We hear stories about Verlander going to the Astros and finding something on video to fix. Darvish went to LA and they helped him tweak his arm angle to get the bite back on his slider.

    Meanwhile the Braves just suck and bring in more dinosaurs like it's the 90s.

  18. #36
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    The issue is we saw a LOT of pitchers take steps backwards this year. In fact, I would say ALL Braves pitchers disappointed this year.

    Teheran's control worsened. Colon's control worsened and then improved with the Twins. Newk didn't improve his control one bit at the MLB level in 100 innings. Folty didn't improve at all. Wisler has the raw stuff to be moderately successful, but somehow got even worse. Fried needs to ditch the FA and pick up a SI. Sims has a couple useful pitches that might be leveraged into some SP success.

    Those things (control/command, sequencing strategy, pitch refinement) are the things a pitching coach is responsible for. We didn't see any of that from the Braves this year, and I think that has to fall on the shoulders of the coaching staff.

    We hear stories about Verlander going to the Astros and finding something on video to fix. Darvish went to LA and they helped him tweak his arm angle to get the bite back on his slider.

    Meanwhile the Braves just suck and bring in more dinosaurs like it's the 90s.
    When you think about it, keeping Chuck Hernandez may be one of the single dumbest things that we have done over the course of the past couple of years. No one could look at our pitchers this year and reasonably say that they were being coached well and may necessary strides. If anything every one of them regressed, maybe with a few that just stayed stagnant. I'm racking my brain trying to think of a single reason why they thought keeping Chuck was a good idea, and I'm coming up empty. It is mind blowing that an organization that has tried to build around strong pitching development has kept someone so obviously inept. The more I think about the more "conspiracy theory" minded I get. Because either our top execs really are just incomprehensibly stupid, or it points to self-sabotage (which I know probably isn't true, so it has to be the former).... Unless someone can give me a good reason we retained him, I think keeping Chuck is some of the best evidence of our front office's ineptitude.

  19. #37
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Enscheff I know he didn't pitch much, but do you have any data on Akeel Morris and his FA/CH combo? Because I have always been higher on Akeel than some other fans because of what I perceive to be a borderline elite changeup, but I would like to see some data that can show it one way or the other.

  20. #38
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    18,946
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,856
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,329
    Thanked in
    3,353 Posts
    The single dumbest thing the Braves have done the last couple of years is listen to the allstar 1B and strip Snit of the interim label. We missed on Black because our players wanted to play hard for Snit. chuckie should have never been hired either. He has sucked everywhere he goes.
    Coppy

  21. #39
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,772
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,491
    Thanked in
    1,150 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    The issue is we saw a LOT of pitchers take steps backwards this year. In fact, I would say ALL Braves pitchers disappointed this year.

    Teheran's control worsened. Colon's control worsened and then improved with the Twins. Newk didn't improve his control one bit at the MLB level in 100 innings. Folty didn't improve at all. Wisler has the raw stuff to be moderately successful, but somehow got even worse. Fried needs to ditch the FA and pick up a SI. Sims has a couple useful pitches that might be leveraged into some SP success.

    Those things (control/command, sequencing strategy, pitch refinement) are the things a pitching coach is responsible for. We didn't see any of that from the Braves this year, and I think that has to fall on the shoulders of the coaching staff.

    We hear stories about Verlander going to the Astros and finding something on video to fix. Darvish went to LA and they helped him tweak his arm angle to get the bite back on his slider.

    Meanwhile the Braves just suck and bring in more dinosaurs like it's the 90s.

    I'm going to defer from opinion on the effectiveness of the pitching coach. I don't like last year's results. I'd rather think it was the pitching coach than the players, but am aware that is often fans wishful thinking that drives them to want to can assistants in all sports.

    If there were a guy out there that has a long history of turning around pitchers or bringing along young ones, I'd be for that. I don't think Hernandez has that reputation.

  22. #40
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Rotograghs did a breakdown of Fried's stuff: https://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/ma...-deep-sleeper/

    The author loves his fastball because it has low spin, good sink and generates ground balls.

    Fried gets 7.3" of rise on his fastball, which is neither good rise (9.1" average) nor good sink (5.5" average). It falls right in the middle...danger zone.

    If Fried switches to a sinker with that low RPM he will likely end up with a pitch with above average sink. I think that and improved command is the key to him sticking in the rotation.

Similar Threads

  1. Grading Syndergaard's pitches
    By Enscheff in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07-30-2019, 12:26 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •