Page 403 of 583 FirstFirst ... 303353393401402403404405413453503 ... LastLast
Results 8,041 to 8,060 of 11642

Thread: Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

  1. #8041
    Making Atlanta Great Again!
    #MAGA!

    Promises MADE, Promises KEPT!
    The Chosen One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    School of Hard Cox
    Posts
    25,337
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8,593
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9,752
    Thanked in
    5,746 Posts
    I'm just waiting to see the full report to make the conclusion.

    I find it interesting how impatient you were for a long time about when is the report gonna drop. Barr makes a summary in less than 2 days and you are running with it.

    I am just awaiting to see the report. The 9/11 commission released a report. That was involving a major national security issue. I see McConnell blocked a resolution in Senate today to release the full report. House passed a resolution 420-0 last week.

    When the full report is released you'll have my full thoughts. Until then, the right can run as many victory laps as possible whilst still being weird about releasing the report to the public. No collusion or obstruction should mean there was no devil in the details and there shouldn't be much of anything redacted.
    Forever Fredi


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to The Chosen One For This Useful Post:

    goldfly (03-25-2019)

  3. #8042
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    24,620
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,428
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,432
    Thanked in
    2,463 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hawk View Post
    Uh, no.

    A Supreme Court ruling ... hell, even a SCOTUS opinion and a legal position paper are completely and entirely different.

    ****.

    Just stop. Stick with the crackpot theories. At least those you don't need to substantiate with fact.
    So what you're telling me is when the DOJ says (and later reaffirms) they don't believe it's constitutional to indict a sitting pre somehow contradicts what I said?
    Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg

  4. #8043
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    24,620
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,428
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,432
    Thanked in
    2,463 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thethe View Post
    He didnt go against the constituion. Executive branch was given the power by congress which is constitutional.

    And the border is the very definition of an emergency and now that wall is being built!
    [MENTION=128]sturg33[/MENTION] I'm giving you one chance here to redeem yourself and come here and declare shenanigans on thethe.

    Update to after sturg's post, still waiting.
    Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg

  5. #8044
    if my thought dreams could be seen goldfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    21,084
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,365
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,337
    Thanked in
    2,262 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BedellBrave View Post
    This thread is pretty funny. 402 pages and counting.
    not as funny as so called followers of christ standing behind this president
    "For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman

    "When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"

  6. #8045
    Making Atlanta Great Again!
    #MAGA!

    Promises MADE, Promises KEPT!
    The Chosen One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    School of Hard Cox
    Posts
    25,337
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8,593
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9,752
    Thanked in
    5,746 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zitothebrave View Post
    [MENTION=128]sturg33[/MENTION] I'm giving you one chance here to redeem yourself and come here and declare shenanigans on thethe.

    Update to after sturg's post, still waiting.
    sturg already said Trump has abused his authority in declaring national emergency for the wall. That was weeks ago when Trump declared it. Nothing to see here.
    Forever Fredi


  7. #8046
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    52,574
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,018
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,095
    Thanked in
    5,757 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zitothebrave View Post
    [MENTION=128]sturg33[/MENTION] I'm giving you one chance here to redeem yourself and come here and declare shenanigans on thethe.

    Update to after sturg's post, still waiting.
    I think Trump is a clown with the national emergency.

    I dont think its constitutional.

    I have no idea how that relates to Russia fantasy conspiracy

  8. #8047
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,886
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    481
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    431
    Thanked in
    314 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thethe View Post
    Because there was no factual basis to substantiate the need to spy on an American citizen? They purposely obfuscated the fact that is bought and paid for research by Hillary.


    And those 'Shady' ties to Russia is complete bunk which ended up being another weak link that led to absolute zero convictions.

    To be so comfortable with this obvious abuse of power is sickening.
    For you to be so comfortable with Trump is mindblowing. Will you continue this craziness when he refuses to leave on 1/20/21? Or will you cry the election was a sham to be headed up by Obama?
    Last edited by VirginiaBrave; 03-25-2019 at 11:16 PM.

  9. #8048
    if my thought dreams could be seen goldfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    21,084
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,365
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,337
    Thanked in
    2,262 Posts
    what conspiracy have i embraced and supposedly still embracing exactly?


    i have said, no one has seen the report and for some reason it isn't released to the public yet


    again, what i do or don't do or say or don't say doesn't matter to you. you have your agenda to post what you have concocted in your brain from your "news sources" on what i believe and you run with it.
    "For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman

    "When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"

  10. #8049
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    24,620
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,428
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,432
    Thanked in
    2,463 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sturg33 View Post
    I think Trump is a clown with the national emergency.

    I dont think its constitutional.

    I have no idea how that relates to Russia fantasy conspiracy
    I'm glad you haven't totally slipped into the deep end. Sometimes I feel the need to check on people.
    Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg

  11. #8050
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    24,620
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,428
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,432
    Thanked in
    2,463 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AerchAngel View Post
    Do you honestly think that Pres. Obama has a great following after his two terms?
    Yup
    Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg

  12. #8051
    Co-Owner, BravesCenter
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,516
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,345
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,305
    Thanked in
    2,446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zitothebrave View Post
    So what you're telling me is when the DOJ says (and later reaffirms) they don't believe it's constitutional to indict a sitting pre somehow contradicts what I said?
    Yes.

    You said that the Department of Justice had a "long standing policy" which prevented a sitting President from being indicted, which is false.

    Two separate Departments opined on the constitutionality of the issue, but, again: not a policy, not a law.

  13. #8052
    Co-Owner, BravesCenter
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,516
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,345
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,305
    Thanked in
    2,446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Individual-1 View Post
    I'm just waiting to see the full report to make the conclusion.

    I find it interesting how impatient you were for a long time about when is the report gonna drop. Barr makes a summary in less than 2 days and you are running with it.

    I am just awaiting to see the report. The 9/11 commission released a report. That was involving a major national security issue. I see McConnell blocked a resolution in Senate today to release the full report. House passed a resolution 420-0 last week.

    When the full report is released you'll have my full thoughts. Until then, the right can run as many victory laps as possible whilst still being weird about releasing the report to the public. No collusion or obstruction should mean there was no devil in the details and there shouldn't be much of anything redacted.
    Can y'all stop pretending that you will actually read a single word of the full report when it is released?

    I'm calling it now. The next "THIS IS BIG" conspiracy theories are going to involve redactions of random **** like people's cell phone numbers.

    Also, impatient? I've sat here for two years choking on bull**** hot air about how 'big investigations take a long time', and then, when the investigation actually concludes you still don't have the balls to accept the results?

    Please.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Hawk For This Useful Post:

    acesfull86 (03-27-2019)

  15. #8053
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    24,620
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,428
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,432
    Thanked in
    2,463 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hawk View Post
    Yes.

    You said that the Department of Justice had a "long standing policy" which prevented a sitting President from being indicted, which is false.

    Two separate Departments opined on the constitutionality of the issue, but, again: not a policy, not a law.
    So wait, let me try rewording this.

    the DOJ believes that it's unconstitutional to indict a sitting president. How is that not policy?

    I never said it was law. You're the one who keeps harping on that.
    Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg

  16. #8054
    Co-Owner, BravesCenter
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,516
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,345
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,305
    Thanked in
    2,446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zitothebrave View Post
    So wait, let me try rewording this.

    the DOJ believes that it's unconstitutional to indict a sitting president. How is that not policy?

    I never said it was law. You're the one who keeps harping on that.
    Good grief man.

    It's not a policy either.

    It's a position that the CLINTON AND NIXON Departments of Justice would have taken in the face of a Presidential indictment, based on their interpretation of the law.

    That is what a Memorandum Opinion is.

    And that is what context is.

    Move on.

  17. #8055
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    24,620
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,428
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,432
    Thanked in
    2,463 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hawk View Post
    Good grief man.

    It's not a policy either.

    It's a position that the CLINTON AND NIXON Departments of Justice would have taken in the face of a Presidential indictment, based on their interpretation of the law.

    That is what a Memorandum Opinion is.

    And that is what context is.

    Move on.
    So what you're saying is that I'm right.

    Got it.

    We won't get a legal ruling unless someone attempts to indict a president, but I'm sure the Supreme Court will rule as the DOJ has. That's why the impeachment clause exists in the Constitution. It's the accepted norm. Bill wasn't indicted by a Grand Jury for Obstruction, neither would Trump.
    Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg

  18. #8056
    Co-Owner, BravesCenter
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,516
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,345
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,305
    Thanked in
    2,446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zitothebrave View Post
    We won't get a legal ruling unless someone attempts to indict a president
    Ding ding.

    You've come a long way from "There's been a long standing policy of the Justice Department (by my quick research since 1973) not to indict or convict a sitting president."

    I accept payment by cash, check, or donations to the Roger Stone defense fund.

  19. #8057
    Connoisseur of Minors zitothebrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    DANGERZONE
    Posts
    24,620
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,428
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,432
    Thanked in
    2,463 Posts
    You think I changed what I said? Are we speaking the same language? I feel like there is a disconnect
    Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg

  20. #8058
    Co-Owner, BravesCenter
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,516
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,345
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4,305
    Thanked in
    2,446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zitothebrave View Post
    You think I changed what I said? Are we speaking the same language? I feel like there is a disconnect
    You posted a factually inaccurate statement designed to prop up a ****ty argument, were schooled, and have now backpedaled to the point where you are making statements in support of my original position.

    Trump has not been indicted because there aren't solid grounds, not because of State Department policy.

  21. #8059
    if my thought dreams could be seen goldfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    21,084
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,365
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,337
    Thanked in
    2,262 Posts
    "For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman

    "When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"

  22. #8060
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    69,570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,507
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,179
    Thanked in
    3,898 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Individual-1 View Post
    I'm just waiting to see the full report to make the conclusion.

    I find it interesting how impatient you were for a long time about when is the report gonna drop. Barr makes a summary in less than 2 days and you are running with it.

    I am just awaiting to see the report. The 9/11 commission released a report. That was involving a major national security issue. I see McConnell blocked a resolution in Senate today to release the full report. House passed a resolution 420-0 last week.

    When the full report is released you'll have my full thoughts. Until then, the right can run as many victory laps as possible whilst still being weird about releasing the report to the public. No collusion or obstruction should mean there was no devil in the details and there shouldn't be much of anything redacted.
    The talking point of 2 days is fake news. Stop falling for fake news.
    Natural Immunity Croc

Similar Threads

  1. The REAL Russia scandal
    By thethe in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 147
    Last Post: 04-22-2022, 09:58 PM
  2. New Huge NYPD scandal
    By cajunrevenge in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-06-2018, 01:38 PM
  3. Replies: 120
    Last Post: 07-27-2016, 07:27 PM
  4. Hastert - Legitimate Scandal
    By 57Brave in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 104
    Last Post: 11-10-2015, 02:32 PM
  5. Russia
    By AerchAngel in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-09-2015, 09:56 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •