That's a funny idea. After he's out of office his support from the GOP is going to dry up very fast.Originally Posted by cajunrevenge
That's a funny idea. After he's out of office his support from the GOP is going to dry up very fast.
FFF - BB, BB, 2B, HR, 2B, HR, 1B, BB, BB, 1B, BB, BB, HR
Manafartov's visits to the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Hell of a scoop by The Guardian's Luke Harding and Dan Collyns if true.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...dorian-embassy
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
There are a small number of questions that are central to this matter and we are getting closer to the answers.
1) Did the Russian hacking operation occur with the knowledge and support of Trump and senior members of his campaign team.
2) Did the Trump campaign coordinate with WikiLeaks to weaponize the stolen emails.
Last edited by nsacpi; 11-27-2018 at 10:09 AM.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
This article is over a year old but provides some context on our friend Pavel.
https://www.justsecurity.org/45255/f...investigation/
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
I would be interested to see if this is confirmed. If it is, damn, it fils in some big pieces.
Carl Bernstein reporting Mueller is looking at a trip Manafort took to Quito in 2017 to meet with Ecuadorian president
what collusion ?
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
I think that the story about Pavel’s visit to the embassy is a little problematic because it’s hard to imagine it being under wraps for this long. On the other hand, the denials of both WL and Pavel himself amount to less than a hill of beans. WL also denied corresponding with Roger Stone, and Pavel is basically a walking lie.
Mueller and crew dont seem to leak to the press. The sourcing for the Guardian story appears to be Ecuadorean.
The objectives of a cooperation agreement like the one Mr. Manafort entered with Mr. Mueller are flatly inconsistent with the obligations of a joint defense agreement. So it doesn’t matter whether or not Mr. Manafort explicitly withdrew from his deal with Mr. Trump, because once he began cooperating — or, at least, pretending do — the legal theory supporting the agreement collapsed. Because Mr. Manafort no longer had, on paper, a “common interest” with Mr. Trump, his lawyers’ communications with Mr. Trump’s lawyers could no longer be seen as cloaked with any expectation of confidentiality.
If they revealed client confidences, they waived the attorney-client privilege. Mr. Mueller can, and perhaps should, try to find out what Mr. Trump’s and Mr. Manafort’s lawyers said to one another about their respective clients after Mr. Manafort began cooperating. The resulting legal battles over privilege would be spectacular.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/28/o...gtype=Homepage
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
Jerome Corsi interview on MSNBC. lol.
Forever Fredi
New details about Stone’s interest in WikiLeaks’ plans emerged this week after one of his associates, conspiracy theorist Jerome Corsi, announced that he had rejected a plea deal offered by Mueller’s team. He provided The Post and other news organizations with a draft filing by prosecutors describing his interactions with Stone — including an Aug. 2, 2016, email in which the right-wing author alerted Stone that he heard WikiLeaks was planning a major release of “very damaging” material.
The next day, Stone had one of his private talks with Trump, Stone said on a 2016 Infowars broadcast first reported by CNN.
In an interview, Stone insisted that the topic of hacked emails was never broached in the Aug. 3 phone call — or in any other communication with Trump.
“It just didn’t come up,” Stone said. “I am able to say we never discussed WikiLeaks. I’m not sure what I would have said to him anyway because it’s all speculation . . . I just didn’t know if it’s true or not.”
Stone, however, sounded much more certain in his public pronouncements at the time, stating confidently that Assange would reveal material that would hurt Clinton’s campaign.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.63428072b28c
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
President Donald Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen has reached a new plea deal with Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation, ABC News has learned.
Cohen is expected to plead guilty to making false statements to congressional committees investigating collusion between Russia and Donald Trump.
https://abc7chicago.com/politics/mic...tion-/4788588/
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
At the risk of practicing "fatism," I think the only conspiracy Corsi was truly concerned with was one that would lead to a possible shortage of bacon.
Really, that sort of body shaming is beneath you.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
a dot that will be connected in due course
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...=.dfe56a1fd11a
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
AP reporting that the guilty plea by Michael Cohen concerns lies to congressional committees about a Trump real estate project in Moscow.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
slow news day
https://www.thedailybeast.com/team-t...er&via=desktop
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
wonder who this Individual 1 fellow might be
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
