Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Random Hypothetical on a Slow Friday Morning

  1. #1
    Swallowed by Mark Bowman
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,545
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    86
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,743
    Thanked in
    1,269 Posts

    Random Hypothetical on a Slow Friday Morning

    I could be working, but screw that.

    Let's say you're a GM and you manage to stumble into two genuinely extraordinary defensive outfielders- think peak Andruw and peak Devon White. Whoever the specific names might be, they are two wonderful center fielders, once-every-20-years kind of guys (you have two of them, so it's not really "once" every 20 years, but ignore that).

    Would it ever be feasible to play extended time with just the two outfielders and five infielders? Teams obviously do that in desperation at the end of some games, but I mean as a regular thing. Maybe if you played in a park with a really small outfield? Or only games started by extreme ground ball pitchers? Or would it just be a catastrophe in every possible scenario?

  2. #2
    Arizona Fall Leaguer
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    188
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    505
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    69
    Thanked in
    45 Posts
    I would not. I would add a great hitting horrible defense guy and stick him on left field line. Let him hit .330 with 35 home runs and just play a small part of the outfield.

  3. #3
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    4,626
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    199
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,328
    Thanked in
    853 Posts
    You'd get absolutely destroyed. Think of all the plays Andruw just barely got to out of his zone during his career. Now add roughly twice the distance he needs to cover.

  4. #4
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,322
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    795
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,424
    Thanked in
    2,274 Posts
    I don't think the added value of essentially eliminating ground balls would make up for the dramatic increase in doubles and triples (and fly all singles).

    When we talk phenomenal outfielders we are talking about them having a catch radius of an extras.. 10 feet? If that. You are still leaving a drastic amount of space.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to chop2chip For This Useful Post:

    gilesfan (08-28-2015), JohnAdcox (08-28-2015)

  6. #5
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,668
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    It maybe could work for a brief time. And that's assuming you have the right kind of pitching staff. But I think over time those exceptional outfielders would start to wear down.

  7. #6
    Swallowed by Mark Bowman
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,545
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    86
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,743
    Thanked in
    1,269 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thewupk View Post
    It maybe could work for a brief time. And that's assuming you have the right kind of pitching staff. But I think over time those exceptional outfielders would start to wear down.
    Yeah, that occurred to me too. You'd need pretty good back-up outfielders to rest your starters, which would basically defeat the purpose of the two-man outfield.

  8. #7
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MadduxFanII View Post
    Yeah, that occurred to me too. You'd need pretty good back-up outfielders to rest your starters, which would basically defeat the purpose of the two-man outfield.
    I think you would definitely lose all your foul ball (RF, LF) outfield outs and likely end up with a ton of triples on balls down the line.

    So, unless you have a staff FULL of ground ball pitchers, I can't see it.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Horsehide Harry For This Useful Post:

    gilesfan (08-28-2015)

  10. #8
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    4,626
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    199
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,328
    Thanked in
    853 Posts
    A bigger problem to me is trying to sort out the offensive impact. The only reason I could see making this move is to add a solid fielding IF. These dudes tend to suck at hitting, so you're likely replacing a Corner OF bat with a Middle IF bat. That alone would seem to negate the benefit of a 5th IF before we even consider the 2 OF portion.

    For that reason, Coach Chris's idea would make a lot more sense to me. Put a dude like David Ortiz in left and let the others do most of the work.

  11. #9
    Brian Jordan's New BFF JohnAdcox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,124
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13,990
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,045
    Thanked in
    459 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach_Chris View Post
    I would not. I would add a great hitting horrible defense guy and stick him on left field line. Let him hit .330 with 35 home runs and just play a small part of the outfield.
    If you can find that guy, I’d play him on the the line in left no matter who you have in center and right.

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JohnAdcox For This Useful Post:

    GovClintonTyree (08-28-2015), Hawk (08-28-2015), Horsehide Harry (08-28-2015)

  13. #10
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    No, this would be a catastrophe in every sense.

    Even all-time great OFs aren't playing in a video game where they can hit a 'turbo' button and run at 3X speed. You would either play them closer to CF and have everything anywhere near the line fall in for a hit, or you would play them further away from CF and leave not only everything down the line open but also everything hit to CF.

    Even if you had 3 all-time great OFs, there would still be plenty of balls fall in for hits. With 2, you would be screwed.

  14. #11
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    You probably couldn't do it full time, but I bet there are some batters whose spray charts indicate this would be the best defensive alignment against them.

  15. #12
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,668
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    You probably couldn't do it full time, but I bet there are some batters whose spray charts indicate this would be the best defensive alignment against them.
    Like those extreme left handed pull hitters. Just load up the right side of the field and pitch in.

  16. #13
    Playing the Waiting Game blueagleace1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    884
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    78
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    277
    Thanked in
    155 Posts
    Tend to agree with everyone else BUT...

    In some parks I think it could work, for example:

    Fenway Park- With the green monster in LF you can have your two outfielders play extremely shaded to the RF side.

    AT&T Park- The Giants already do this with their RF by shading him towards triple's alley (this would be the hardest of them)

    Minute Maid Park- Same thing as Fenway, but with the Crawford boxes's in LF you could have your outfielders play a normal CF/RF with a little shift towards LF


    Again, let me say I agree that this wouldn't work but there are a couple ballparks where I think maybe, just maybe, it wouldn't kill you.





    By the way... Fun little hypothetical [MENTION=236]MadduxFanII[/MENTION]
    "Don't tell me the sky's the limit when there are footprints on the moon"

  17. #14
    It's OVER 5,000! Runnin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    12,768
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,396
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,946
    Thanked in
    2,064 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach_Chris View Post
    I would not. I would add a great hitting horrible defense guy and stick him on left field line. Let him hit .330 with 35 home runs and just play a small part of the outfield.
    I'll take that guy anytime. How about Ryan Klesko?

Similar Threads

  1. Hypothetical Trade
    By Horsehide Harry in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-18-2017, 02:12 AM
  2. Random **** you Own
    By zitothebrave in forum Fulton County Fire & BBQ
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-25-2014, 04:16 PM
  3. Hypothetical Trade Scenario
    By CJC in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-24-2014, 08:43 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-02-2013, 09:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •