JohnAdcox (10-02-2013)
Thats the right move. He has no use to this team.
Natural Immunity Croc
JohnAdcox (10-02-2013)
Cant say I am surprised. Such a volatile subject on forum boards but Im guessing that this is the beginning of the end for Uggla in Atlanta.
If Uggla is not on the roster than means Janish is. They do need one backup infielder. I would go with Uggla over Janish. Suppose Elliott Johnson gets hurt. Do you want Janish or Uggla playing the remaining games at second?
JohnAdcox (10-02-2013)
I"d rather play Janish, honestly.
Well. Nailed him being a dud.
If not Uggla, I want EJ out there (and bat him 9th).
If we honestly had better options I wouldn't mind this, but Johnson is not necessarily that. Oh well, not that it will matter too much. 2B will continue to be a black hole.
Wonder if BJ got the same message? When we reach the WS, really have little choice but put Uggla back on the roster. Dont see any of our bench players as having value enough to DH.
Dalyn (10-01-2013)
I'm a bit surprised. We don't have much of a bench and he can draw a walk (although that is pretty much it).
We've been over this a bunch, but I remain firm in that I was fine acquiring Uggla, but I thought it was crazy to re-negotiate with (and extend) him after he was acquired. Just a terrible move.
Braves1976 (10-02-2013)
If true this is very interesting from a couple angles. Fredi played Uggla more the last couple weeks than he played BJ. Does this mean BJ also won't make the roster? The other interesting aspect is the question of who makes these roster decisions. Does Fredi have final say?